Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | YANG Luao | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 2 | SIU Aiden | V V D V V | V V V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 3 | KEE Andrew L. | D D V V V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 3 | KIM Ryan Y. | V V V V | V V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 5 | MA Andrew | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 6 | LIN Michael | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 7 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | V V V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 8 | OH Jaden | V V V V D | V V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 9 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 10 | CHOI Ethan | V V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 11 | KNOEPFFLER Alex | V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 12 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 13 | WECHSLER Jacob | V V V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 14 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | D V V V | V V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 15 | GOGOI Vir K. | V V D D | V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 16 | YAO Bradley | D V D V D | V V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 17 | REEVES Liam | V V V V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 18 | LIU Jacob B. | V V V V D | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 19 | CANLAS Nathan | D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 20 | ZHEN Ethan | V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 21 | TANG August L. | V V V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 22 | REYES Omar | V D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 23 | LLIDO Soren | V D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 24 | MIN Eric | V D D V V | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 25 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 26 | JI Aidan Y. | D V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 27 | DESHMUKH Arjun | V V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 28 | TANG Alexander L. | D V D D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 29 | HUANG Eythan | D D D V V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 30 | LING Eddie | V D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 31 | KUSHNIR Aden N. | D V D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 32 | XU Andy P. | D D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 33 | SPINA Joseph B. | V D V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 34 | HAN Derek | V V V D D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 35 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | D V D V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 36 | DINSAY Kristjan | D D V V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 37 | ZHANG Aaron | D V V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 38 | LIU Ethan | D V V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 39 | NICOLETTI Luca | D D V D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 40 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | V D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 41 | WANG Jackson | V D D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 42 | ZHOU Leon | D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 43 | FUKUDA Diego | D D D V | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 44 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | V D D D D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 45 | SANTOS Carlos R. | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 46 | ALLEN Henry G. | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 47 | WU Lucas | D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 48 | NGUYEN martin | D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 49 | LIM Lance Jeremiah | D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 50 | MA Bryant | D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 51 | PARK Gabriel | D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 52 | GOHSMAN Maxwell | D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 53 | SISINNI Riccardo | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 53 | PARK Sangmin | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 55 | TANG Albert | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 56 | BAYLDON william | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 57 | EDWARDS Maxon | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 58 | FINDLAY Zachary | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.