, - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GUO Jessica Zi Jia | - | - | - | - | - | 8% | 92% |
| 2 | JING Emily | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 3 | KIM Rachael | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 3 | APELIAN Katherine | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 5 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
| 6 | LEE Brianna J. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 7 | FANG Sabrina | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
| 8 | KNIGHT Skylar | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% |
| 9 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 10 | QIAN Crystal | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 34% |
| 11 | HO Brianna W. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 12 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% |
| 13 | KONG Chin-Yi | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 14 | SHEN Lydia | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 15 | HALL Velma | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 20% |
| 16 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 17 | KLINE Melissa C. | - | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 18 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% | |
| 19 | MASSICK Laine | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% | ||
| 20 | KOO Rachel A. | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 28% |
| 21 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 22 | OH Erin H. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
| 23 | PERLMAN Talia | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 24 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 25 | CHEN Jessie S. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 26 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 20% |
| 27 | YU Seneca | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 29 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 30 | KIM Katherine | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
| 31 | TALAVERA Daena | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 32 | JO Mia C. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 10% | |
| 33 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
| 34 | PETROVA Kristina | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 35 | LI Phoebe J. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 15% |
| 36 | LOCKE Savannah | - | 1% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 2% |
| 37 | YU Lauren C. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 38 | ZHAO Sophie L. | - | 5% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 39 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | 4% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | KOREN Lihy Peer | - | 2% | 8% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 8% |
| 41 | WANG Ellen | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
| 42 | GUERRA Sofia E. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 43 | CHO Cameron S. | 1% | 14% | 42% | 36% | 8% | ||
| 44 | HUNG Juliana K. | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
| 45 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 45 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | 1% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 47 | YHIP Mikaela M. | - | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 48 | DUAN Konnie | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 49 | CHO Gracie L. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 50 | LI Meilin | - | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 51 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 52 | CHEN Allison V. | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 53 | KHOO Lauren A. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 54 | EYER Hailey M. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
| 55 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | - |
| 56 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% |
| 57 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 58 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | 4% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 59 | HE Fenghuan | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 60 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | - | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 4% |
| 60 | SENIC Adeline | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 62 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 1% |
| 63 | DEBACK Greta I. | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 64 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 65 | SARTORI Taylor M. | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 66 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 67 | SERBAN Samantha M. | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 15% | |
| 68 | FERNANDES Thea | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 69 | LEE Bethany W. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 70 | WONG Sophia M. | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 71 | KOSTELNY Alexis | - | 3% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 72 | LI Rachel Y. | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 73 | MEI Sarah | 23% | 49% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 74 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 24% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 74 | WU Julianna Y. | 1% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 76 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | 13% | 40% | 38% | 9% | ||
| 77 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 9% |
| 78 | ORVANANOS Anice | 1% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 79 | BATRA Chaahat | - | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 80 | KONG Olivia | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 81 | LIN Ashley | - | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 82 | HECKMANN Emma | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 83 | CAO Arianna L. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% | |
| 84 | XUE Alanna L. | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 85 | LEE Lavender | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 86 | HUANG NATALIE | 9% | 39% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 87 | GU EMILY | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 88 | JANG Kimberley | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 89 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | 17% | 57% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 90 | UPTON Elizabeth | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 90 | ZULUETA Catherine | 56% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 92 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 93 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 5% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 94 | LIU Sophia | 13% | 42% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 95 | SUN Chien-Yu | 4% | 40% | 41% | 14% | 1% | ||
| 96 | LEE Ariana | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 97 | CHO Rebecca H. | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 98 | PENG Amber L. | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 98 | SULEIMAN Alysa J. | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 100 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 101 | WU Irene M. | 1% | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 102 | HAYES Alyssa R. | 25% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 103 | SU Michelle | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 104 | LEE Ji Ahn | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 105 | DATLA Medha | 47% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 106 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 2% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 106 | MUSTO Isabella | 30% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 108 | ZGOMBIC Emily | 44% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 109 | HSIUNG Samantha | 4% | 55% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 109 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 68% | 30% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 111 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 48% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 112 | HSIEH Rebecca | 25% | 50% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 113 | WANDJI Anais | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 114 | TAN Clarisse | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 114 | LEE Fiona E. | 58% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 116 | LI Sophia M. | 16% | 49% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 117 | YANG Lingting | 13% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 118 | KENNEDY Elizabeth | 29% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 119 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | ||
| 120 | BRADFORD Meeah | < 1% | 1% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 121 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 122 | QIAN Zhiyan | 53% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 123 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 124 | HSIEH Sabrina | 91% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 125 | DATLA Meha | 86% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.