The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

June NAC

Div I Women's Saber

Sunday, June 6, 2021 at 1:15 PM

, - Richmond, VA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. V V V V D V V V V V V V 5.4 5 -0.4
2 MARSEE Samantha V V V V V V V V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
3 GREENBAUM Atara R. V V V V D D V V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
3 JENKINS Ryan J. V V V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
5 SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda V V V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
6 SULLIVAN Siobhan R. V V V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
7 DELSOIN Chelsea C. V V V V V V V V D 2.9 5 +2.1
8 PAK Kaitlyn V V D V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
9 FOUR-GARCIA Madison V D V V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
10 ZEGERS Anneke E. V V V V V D V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
11 KONG Vera V V V V V D V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
12 LINDER Kara E. D V V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
13 JOHNSON Honor B. V V D V V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
14 SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne D V V V D V V V D 5.1 4 -1.1
15 KIM Zoe D V V V D V V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
16 CODY Alexandra C. V D D V D D V V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
17 THEODORE Maria A. V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
17 TONG Kunling V V V V V V V D 3.8 6 +2.2
19 WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. V V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
20 WILLIAMS Chloe C. V V V D V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
21 OISHI Megumi V V V V D V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
22 JULIEN Michelle V V V V V D V D 2.5 5 +2.5
23 NEWELL Alexia C. V V V V D V D 2.1 4 +1.9
24 ADYNSKI Gillian I. V V V D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
25 WIGGERS Susan Q. V V D V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
26 ANDRES Katherine A. V D V V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
27 CHAN Casey D V V D V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
28 LEE Alexandra B. V V D V V D V D 4.1 4 -0.1
29 SATHYANATH Kailing V V V D D V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
30 HARRILL Gillian N. D V V V V D V D 4.9 4 -0.9
31 GOUHIN Chloe D V D V V V V D 4.0 4 -
32 POSSICK Lola P. V V D V D V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
33 FREEDMAN Janna N. V V D V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
34 ANGLADE Alexis C. V V V D V D 4.4 4 -0.4
35 MIKA Veronica V V V D V D 2.6 4 +1.4
36 GORMAN Alexandra C. D V V V D V D 3.8 4 +0.2
37 LU Vivian Y. D V V D V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
38 KOVACS Sophia D V V V D V D 3.9 4 +0.1
39 TAO Hannah J. D V V V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
40 STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. D V V V V D D 4.5 4 -0.5
41 GUTHIKONDA Nithya V V V V D D D 3.7 4 +0.3
42 YANG Ashley M. V V D D V V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
43 BLUM Leah I. V V V V D D V D 2.9 4 +1.1
44 BOIS Adele D V V V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
45 CAO Stephanie X. V D V D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
46 CHIN Erika J. D V D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
47 AVAKIAN Mikaela D D V D V V V D 4.5 3 -1.5
47 TZOU Alexandra V V D D D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
49 NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. D D D V V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
50 ANDRES Charmaine G. V D D D V V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
51 SHOMAN Jenna D V V D D V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
52 SHEALY Maggie V V D D D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
53 BROWNE Alexis G. D V D V D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
54 CALLAHAN Chase J. V V D D V D V D 1.8 3 +1.2
55 HULSEBURG Kaitlyn V V V D D D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
56 SHOMAN Miriam D D V V D V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
57 STONE Hava S. D D D V V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
58 GORMLEY Arwen E. D V D D V V D 2.9 2 -0.9
59 OLSEN Natalie J. D D D D V V V D 2.3 2 -0.3
60 CHIOLDI Mina V D D D V D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
61 MATAIEV Natalie S. V D D D D V V D 1.5 2 +0.5
62 GREENBAUM Ella K. D D V V D D D 2.7 2 -0.7
63 YODER Bridget H. V D D V D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
64 LI Victoria J. D V D V D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
65 DRAGON Rainer V V D D V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
66 LI Amanda C. D V V V D D 2.7 3 +0.3
67 MILLER Sky V D V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
68 HONE Katarina G. D D V V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
69 VESTEL Mira B. V D V V D D D 2.3 3 +0.7
70 STAPLETON Lindsay K. D D D V V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
71 SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. D D V D V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
72 HARRISON Imogen N. D V D D V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
73 WU Erica L. V V D D V D D 2.1 3 +0.9
74 LU Elaine D D V D V V D 1.5 3 +1.5
75 TIMOFEYEV Nicole D D V V D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
76 HURST Kennedy D V V D V D D 1.5 3 +1.5
77 SLOBODSKY Sasha L. D D V V D D 1.1 2 +0.9
78 BUHAY Rachel T. V D D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
79 JUNG Irene D V D D V D 1.1 2 +0.9
80 WEINBERG Alexandra L. V D V D D D 3.9 2 -1.9
81 CHANG Josephine S. V D D D V D D 3.2 2 -1.2
82 NI Sharon D D D V V D D 1.5 2 +0.5
83 BROWN Emma D D V D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
84 YONG Erika E. D D D V V D D 2.7 2 -0.7
85 TURNOF Kayla M. D D D D V V D 1.2 2 +0.8
85 HILD Nisha D D D D V V D 2.3 2 -0.3
87 CHEN Xinyan V D D V D D D 1.2 2 +0.8
88 LU Amy D V V D D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
89 XI Shining D V D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
90 BALAKUMARAN Maya V D D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
91 ALCEBAR Kayla D D D V D 1.9 1 -0.9
92 SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. D D V D D 2.2 1 -1.2
93 GORMAN Victoria M. V D D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
94 TUCKER Iman R. D V D D D D 2.4 1 -1.4
95 MOYA Keona L. D D V D D D 4.0 1 -3.0
96 LIU Rachel D D D D V D 2.5 1 -1.5
97 ANTHONY Alexia B. D D V D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
98 DANK Dina D V D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
99 KALRA Himani V. D D D V D D 2.5 1 -1.5
100 AKARD Micah M. D D D D D V 0.9 1 +0.1
101 ATLURI Sara V. D D V D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
102 YUN Maya D V D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
103 CHANG Emily V D D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
104 ENGELMAN Madeline A. D D D D V D 2.6 1 -1.6
105 SUBRAMANIAN Nitika V D D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
106 SZETO Chloe D D V D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
107 HOLMES Emma D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
108 BILILIES Sophia D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
109 BHATTACHARJEE Rhea D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
109 BAKER Audrey C. D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
111 ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
112 BENOIT Adelaide L. D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
112 NEIBART Fiona D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
114 DEPEW Charlotte R. D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.