Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
2 | JIANG Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% |
3 | FRIAS SAUL F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 52% |
3 | AVAKIAN Alec | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% |
5 | JEFFORDS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 23% |
6 | HOLZ Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
7 | PATIL Aaryan A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
8 | BERGER Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
9 | BREIER Satchel E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
10 | KROON Lucas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
11 | XU William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 9% |
12 | QIU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 58% | 13% | 1% |
13 | LIM William J. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
14 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 52% | 11% | 1% |
15 | STONE Esmond A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
16 | YANG Ziyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
17 | JINICH Ilan R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
18 | BAUER Hank E. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
19 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
20 | REYES Xavier M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
21 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
22 | REED Samuel J. | 100% | 95% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | |
23 | SCHERER Max | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
24 | GAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
25 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
26 | CENTENO Zachary | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
27 | KUMAR Sachit | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | |
28 | LO Konnor | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - |
29 | LO Andrew T. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
30 | RAMANAN Govind | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
31 | CHOW William T. | 100% | 97% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
32 | CHEN Lohen | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
33 | HOLZ William A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 16% | |
34 | CHAN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
35 | RHEE Ethan N. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 6% | |
36 | TAO Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
37 | ZHANG Yankun | 100% | 79% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
38 | LINDSEY Aiden | 100% | 94% | 62% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
39 | JAIN Aniket | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
40 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
41 | NIETO Titus P. | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
42 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
43 | VELTZ Tyler J. | 100% | 49% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
44 | KIM Evan | 100% | 65% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - |
45 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
46 | MONSON Eli | 100% | 67% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
47 | GAO Marcus | 100% | 55% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
48 | URCIOLI Phenix | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.