The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

Fairfax Challenge SYC

Y-14 Men's Foil

Saturday, April 29, 2017 at 8:00 AM

Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center - Miami, FL, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 NDIAYE Edriss V V V V V V V V V V V V 4.2 6 +1.8
2 LUTAR Lucas N. V V V D V V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
3 CRALEY Thomas M. D V V V V D V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
3 VITI Mark G. V V D V V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
5 HAMILTON Bogdan A. V V V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
6 PELOSKY Ryan F. V V V V V V V V V D 4.4 6 +1.6
7 SHAFAIE Kaveh V V V V V V V V V D 4.4 6 +1.6
8 BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. V V V V V D V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
9 EMMER Chase T. V V V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
10 KIM Nicholas W. V V V V V V V V D 4.4 6 +1.6
11 TUMMINGS C.J. V D V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
12 LEE Chris V V V D V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
13 FU Samuel Y. D V V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
14 REALS Alden D. V D D V V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
15 WALTER Evran M. V D V D D V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
16 CHEN Allen D V V D D D V V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
17 AUGUSTINE Ethan A. V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
18 GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
19 YEROKHIN Michael N. V V V V V V V D 4.4 6 +1.6
20 JANG Jaewon V D V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
21 LOCKWOOD Owen V V V V D V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
22 LOUIE Timothy J. V V V V D V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
23 CHEN Andrew V V D V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
24 LIU Eric P. V V D V V D V D 3.3 4 +0.7
25 SMITH Quin V V V V D D V D 3.9 4 +0.1
26 LIU Kevin X. V D V D V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
27 GILBERT-GOLDSTEIN Avery E. V V V V D D V D 3.9 4 +0.1
28 ZHANG Henry C. V V V D D D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
29 SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. V D D D V V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
30 KIM Tei D. D D D V V V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
31 CHAN Tyler D D D V V D V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
32 LI Yulei D D V D D V V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
33 GEE Brandon D V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
34 SINGH Dayaal V V V D V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
35 STANLEY Mason B. V D V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
36 PETERS Nathan M. D V V V V D D 3.2 4 +0.8
37 GU Jeffrey D V V D V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
38 ZELJKOVIC Dusan V V V V D D D 3.8 4 +0.2
39 SHIKHMAN Robert V V D D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
40 STANLEY Hanno V V D V D V D 3.8 4 +0.2
41 MITCHUM Drew J V D V V D V D 3.9 4 +0.1
42 RINEHART Conner M. V V V V D D D 4.0 4 -
43 PAE Jonathan L. D V V V D D D 2.9 3 +0.1
44 REZNICK Nicholas J. D D V D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
44 WEN George C. D V D V D V D 2.7 3 +0.3
47 KASI Sanjay V D V D D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
48 LI Jeffrey V V D D D V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
49 PELOSKY Zack B. V D V D D V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
50 YU Vinni D D V D V D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
51 PICARD Justin V D D D V D V D 2.8 2 -0.8
52 LYUTIKOV Yegor D D D V V D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
53 ONIK Elijah T. D D D V V D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
54 TIAN Aaron C. D V D D V D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
55 FEDONCHIK Henry J. D V D D V D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
55 LAURICELLA Douglas V D V D D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
57 EDWARDS Mark S. D D V D V D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
58 WILLIAMS Connor J. V D D D D V V D 2.3 2 -0.3
60 FURST Matthew C. D D D D V D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
60 ROBINSON Keegan B. D V D D D D V D 2.5 1 -1.5
62 MAK Jeff D V D D D D V D 2.2 1 -1.2
63 BELLUOMO David C. D D D D V D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
64 ZELTSER Lawrence M. D D D V D D V D 2.1 1 -1.1
67 BOBROW Logan D D V D V D D 2.6 2 -0.6
68 BRODERICK Padraig D V D V D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
69 KULKARNI Ansh A. D D V D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
70 MITCHELL Philip D. D D D D D V D 1.6 1 -0.6
71 SURINGA William J. V D D D D D D 2.7 1 -1.7
72 SHA Yi Peng D D D D V D D 1.9 1 -0.9
73 ZHAO Dylan L. D D D V D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
74 SONG Leonardo T. D D D D D V D 2.0 1 -1.0
75 MAHNKEN Thomas D V D D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
76 YOST Jacob A. D D D D V D D 1.9 1 -0.9
77 PAULSON Connor M. D D V D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
78 VLAHOS Ioannis M. D D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
79 BARBER Stas A. D D D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
80 LE Vyn A. D D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
82 CIDECIYAN Nicholas D D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
84 FAJER Jacob K. D D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.