Chaminade High School - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 2 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
| 3 | FERRIERE Joshua | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 27% | 3% | |
| 3 | REDDINGTON Aidan | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 5 | WARD Edward | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 6 | TOLBERT-SCHWARTZ Everett | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 7 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 8 | KOSLU Aidan D. | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 9 | PEÑA Ethan | 8% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 10 | ANSELL Zachary | - | - | 2% | 21% | 52% | 25% | |
| 12 | JU Hanul | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 13 | FRIEDMAN Jonas | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 2% |
| 14 | RAMOS Russell K. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 3% | |
| 15 | KIRK Marcus Haagen | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 16 | WACZIARG Simon | 53% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 17 | MOHANTY Devan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 52% | |
| 18 | LEE Jaden T. | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | O'BRIEN Beckett | - | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 8% | |
| 20 | COMER Alexander J. | - | 3% | 21% | 47% | 26% | 3% | |
| 21 | SUH Victor | 9% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | PAINTER Noah | 4% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 23 | ROBERTS Tyler | 21% | 45% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | ROBERTS Owen | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 25 | TRIM Joshua | 1% | 7% | 22% | 32% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 26 | PALMER Nathaniel | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 27 | GOMEZ Emmanuel | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 28 | WHITEMAN Ryan | 2% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 29 | GHOTANIAN Marc | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 30 | CHEN Brian | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | MARDANI Aiden | 7% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 2% | - |
| 32 | ROSS Eli | 8% | 35% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | LEE Joshua | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 34 | NA Larry | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 35 | SPENCER Cale | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
| 36 | RIORDAN Micah | 21% | 45% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 37 | SAUTER Luke | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | STAFFORD Michael | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
| 39 | CROUTCH Justin | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 40 | REECE Chapin | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
| 40 | MONTALVO David | 2% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 42 | BELLASARIAN Benjamin | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 4% | |
| 43 | REINERS Boden | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 44 | SOWERS Oliver | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 45 | BUSTRUM Nathan | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 46 | HWANG Charles | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | IYER Pranav | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 48 | CHEN David | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 49 | MITTLEMAN Daniel | 2% | 27% | 45% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 50 | YANAI Charlie | 10% | 30% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | XU Jiaqian | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 52 | DIAZ Jairo | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - | |
| 53 | CORTEZ Julian | 7% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.