The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

April NAC

Div I Men's Épée

Saturday, April 17, 2021 at 8:15 AM

Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 FEINBERG Gabriel M. V V D V V D V V V V V V 4.4 4 -0.4
2 WEISS Lewis E. V V D V V V V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
3 KAULL James T. V D V V D V V V V V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
3 VERMEULE Spencer V V V V D V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
5 KUSHNERIK Ethan D V V V V D V V V D 4.0 4 -
6 IYOKI Kent V D D V V V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
7 GRIFFITHS Ryan V D V V D V V V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
8 LEE Ryan D V D D V D V V V V D 3.9 2 -1.9
9 EWART Jr. Stephen P. V V V V D V V V D 5.5 5 -0.5
10 MA Ark V V V V D V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
11 NORTH Gary S. V V V D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
12 WEISS Miles J. D V V V D V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
13 MATVEEV Valentin S. V V V V D D V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
14 WALSH Kevin V V D D V V V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
15 PISKOVATSKOV Jonathan (Yonik) V V D V D D V V V D 5.3 3 -2.3
16 YUMIACO Nolan C. D V D D V D V V V D 2.1 2 -0.1
17 MARAKOV Allen B. V V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
18 JIN Owen V V V V V V V D 2.5 6 +3.5
19 CANDREVA Hunter R. V V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
20 LIU Alexander V V V D V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
21 JEONG Connor V V V D V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
22 GUINAN Joseph V V V V V D V D 3.1 5 +1.9
23 SIVAKUMAR Ajit V V V V V D V D 1.8 5 +3.2
24 PISKOVATSKOV Anton D V V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
25 WHITE Sean V V V V D V D 4.4 4 -0.4
26 DOLGONOS Mark V D V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
27 BISSINGER Michael P. D V V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
28 LIVERANT Skyler J. D V D V V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
29 PETROSEWICZ Thomas (TJ) ". V V D V D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
30 CHONG christopher D D V V D V V V D 1.8 3 +1.2
31 LONCAR Luka E. D D V V D V V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
32 RHYU Kozmo D D D D V V V V D 2.8 2 -0.8
33 SANDERS Ian W. V V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
34 CLICK Aiden V V V V V D 1.0 5 +4.0
35 KRAFT Dennis A. V D V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
36 GANA Jr Jorge M. V D V V V V D 2.9 5 +2.1
37 RUSSANOV Dennis V V D V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
38 JONES Simon A. D V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
39 GOHEL Dayus T. V V V D V D D 2.2 4 +1.8
40 SMITH Nicholas S. D V V D V V D 1.9 4 +2.1
41 IMREK Samuel A. D V D V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
42 SPITERI Gareth J. D V V V D V D 4.3 4 -0.3
42 LIN Kyran V D D V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
44 GRAY Sterling B. V V D V D V D 3.3 4 +0.7
45 CUMMINGS Atticus C. D D V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
46 KIM Juni C. V V D D V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
47 SAITOC Tudor V V D D V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
48 PETROLL Jared P. V D V V D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
49 SHARMA Sanil V D V D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
50 SWANSON Lars M. V V D V D V D 2.1 3 +0.9
51 FELDMAN Jaemin D D V V V V D 1.6 3 +1.4
52 PHILLIPS Jeffrey T. D V D V V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
53 FRAY Alexander D D V V V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
54 MALIASSOV Nikita S. D D V V D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
55 KIM Ethan J. D D V V V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
56 BEKKER Mitchel D D V V D V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
57 HUGHES Levi H. D V V D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
58 HURME Tommi K. D D D V V V D 2.3 2 -0.3
59 SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. V D V D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
60 GRABER Andrew J. D V V D D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
61 ROBINSON Riley D D V V D V D 2.8 2 -0.8
62 RODNEY Maxwell V D D D V D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
63 WHELAN Thomas (Tony) V D D D V D V D 3.7 2 -1.7
64 SHAH Maximilian A. D D D V V D V D 2.0 2 -
65 DAO Matthew M. D V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
66 BOYCE Samuel H. V D V D V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
67 MANDOKI Sandor I. V V V D D V D 3.5 4 +0.5
68 TAFOYA Devin D. V V D D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
69 JIN Nicholas D V D V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
69 MOSES Alexander V V D D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
71 LEE Daniel Y. V D V D V D 1.7 3 +1.3
72 XU Zitong (Evan) D D V V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
73 KARAUSKY Joshua C. D V V V D D D 2.8 3 +0.2
74 YUROVCHAK Andrew T. V D D D V V D 3.0 3 -
75 STUSNICK Hunter D V D D V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
76 NIXON Mark V D V V D D D 2.5 3 +0.5
77 NEAL John P. V D V V D D D 1.9 3 +1.1
78 BUI James H. V D V D V D D 2.8 3 +0.2
79 POPOVICI Michael A. V D V D D D 3.2 2 -1.2
80 LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. V D V D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
81 KAJI Ty V V D D D D 1.0 2 +1.0
82 MUN Michael K. D D V D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
83 JEYOON Ryan S. D D V D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
84 YAO Shun V D D V D D 0.8 2 +1.2
85 GYURE Brayden H. V V D D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
86 WU Joseph D V V D D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
86 MUGA Boris D D V D V D D 2.3 2 -0.3
88 KRAVIT Connor B. D V D D V D D 3.5 2 -1.5
89 ZHOU Stanley Q. D V D D D V D 1.2 2 +0.8
90 GUI Runlin V V D D D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
91 KUMASHI Mihir R. D D V V D D D 4.1 2 -2.1
92 LOCASALE Nicholas A. D D D V V D 0.6 2 +1.4
93 GIBSON Nowell L. D V V D D D 3.4 2 -1.4
94 ZHU Max D D D V D V 2.4 2 -0.4
95 PARK Ian C. D V D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
96 CARPENTER Liam D V D D D 3.5 1 -2.5
97 MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. D D D D V 1.2 1 -0.2
98 MUNLIN Donovan D D D V D 2.7 1 -1.7
99 LAI Coby V D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
100 CANDELA Nicholas D D D V D 3.1 1 -2.1
101 KROPP Jack V D D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
102 RIBAUDO David J. D D D D V 0.9 1 +0.1
103 WOZNIAK David D V D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
104 SILVERS Noah E. D D V D D D 3.5 1 -2.5
105 WOZNIAK Sebastian D D D D V D 2.4 1 -1.4
106 PARKER Riley D. D V D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
107 GOLDFINE Ian J. V D D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
108 TARBUSKOVICH III John D V D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
109 POPOVICI Alexander M. V D D D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
110 MORSE Tyler D V D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
110 KIM William M. D V D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
112 SHIV Rishi D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
113 LIANG Aaron D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
114 GORIUNOV IVAN A. D D D D D 2.3 0 -2.3
115 YOUNG Peyton E. D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
116 CAI Brian D D D D D 2.5 0 -2.5
117 MADSEN Jr Eric W. D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
118 LIOZNYANSKY Simon D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.