Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIN Jessica Y. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 38% |
| 2 | PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 44% | 16% | |
| 3 | BASSA Francesca A. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 76% |
| 3 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% | |
| 5 | LIU Charlene (Kai) | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 44% | |
| 6 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 7 | PATURU Meghana | 1% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 2% | |
| 8 | GRADY Miriam A. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 9 | NIXON Catherine (Kasia) D. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% | |
| 10 | FALLON Kyle R. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 11 | TYLER Syd | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 12 | YAMANAKA Mina | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 11% |
| 13 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
| 14 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 1% |
| 15 | BEITTEL Chloe F. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% | |
| 16 | WEISS Talia L. | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 17 | JOYCE Michaela | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 65% |
| 18 | BOYS Nishta B. | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 19 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
| 20 | TONCHEVA Victoria M. | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 21 | LURYE Sarah | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
| 22 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 23 | GANDHI Sedna S. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 3% |
| 24 | WANG Karen | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 25 | GU Sarah | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 26 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
| 27 | CHIN Isabella | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 28 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 29 | MALDONADO Pilar I. | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 30 | GRESHAM Sarah L. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 31 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 17% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | KIM Diane E. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 33 | LIN Katie Y. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
| 34 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | 1% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 35 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
| 36 | SHAMSIAN Shaya | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 37 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
| 38 | WANG Elizabeth | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 39 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 40 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 40 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 40 | MAO Amy | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 43 | FILIPPOV Nika D. | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 44 | KIM Zoe L. | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 45 | WHITTEMORE Lucy K. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 46 | GAO Judy | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 48 | DESAI Meera P. | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 49 | GITHENS Gracyn J. | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 51 | LIN Elaine | 61% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 52 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 33% | 44% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 53 | REID Anousheh | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 54 | LEUNG Natalie | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 55 | LUO Ashley | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 56 | CHU Audrey | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 57 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 58 | GRESHAM Rebekah L. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 58 | CHOI Eunice | 5% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 60 | CAREY Michele S. | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | SUMRALL Emily M. | 9% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 62 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 63 | LIU Christina A. | 4% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 64 | MAYER Ingrid V. | 12% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | KORKIN Alice | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 66 | LEE Michelle J. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% | |
| 67 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 68 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | 35% | 41% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | MEHROTRA Anya | 2% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 70 | PADHYE Tanishka | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 71 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | 2% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 72 | KIM Erika S. | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | SMUK Daria A. | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.