Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KATS Dylan G. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 2 | IARIKOV Nicholas | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% | |
| 3 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 3 | LEE Samuel Y. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 23% |
| 5 | DODIN David | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 48% | |
| 6 | LO Jake | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 7 | SHCHUR Landon | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
| 8 | WOLFE Alex | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 9 | KHANNA Nikhil | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 10 | TIYA BIAYA K. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
| 11 | LOISEAU Eliott | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
| 12 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | - | 6% | 30% | 45% | 18% | |
| 13 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
| 14 | CHIN Dylan A. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | KIM Jayden | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | MULCAHY Olaf | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% |
| 17 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 13% |
| 18 | ZHENG Andy | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 19 | KIM Nathan | - | - | 6% | 31% | 47% | 16% | |
| 20 | SKORUPAN Grant | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 30% | 6% | |
| 21 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% |
| 22 | SAUNIER Cameron | - | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 23 | BARG Jonathan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 24 | KARNAS Karol | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 29% | 4% |
| 25 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% |
| 26 | CHEN Zhengyang | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | XIONG Aaron | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 28 | BORISENKO Samuel | 28% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | YU Austin | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 30 | LEE inwoo | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 31 | LAI Boden | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | ESKRIDGE Caleb | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 34 | ROMANOV Ethan | - | 2% | 20% | 46% | 28% | 4% | |
| 35 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 36 | GINZBURG Adam | 1% | 10% | 47% | 35% | 8% | - | |
| 37 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | 7% | 32% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | KOLLARS Jacob | 2% | 15% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 39 | ZHENG Jerry | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 40 | HEADRICK Lance | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | MITEV Alexander | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | RYAN Pierce | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 43 | GADDE Neel | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | LOISEAU Oscar | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | HERNDON Liam | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 46 | TAI Edison | 7% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | HEADRICK Jack | 1% | 14% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 48 | WANG Joey | 14% | 42% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | XIA Richard | 62% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | VAN VACTER Thomas | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 51 | BRADSHAW Carter | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | PARRA Sebastian | 8% | 41% | 38% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | MEHROTRA Neel | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 54 | ALI Farhan | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | OLSON Joseph | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | MAXU Tiger | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | MANGAN Hunter | 23% | 61% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 57 | LEE DoWon | 42% | 43% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 59 | FALKIEWICZ Alec R. | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 60 | GATZA Jason | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 61 | KIM Remington | 69% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.