The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 30% |
| 2 | OH Samuel H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 3 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% |
| 3 | LAO Scott E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 5 | ZHANG Luke T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% |
| 6 | ZENG Lucas H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 69% |
| 7 | WOO Christian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 14% |
| 8 | MA Bryant | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
| 9 | DANKAR Neel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 10 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% |
| 11 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 38% | 4% |
| 12 | COELHO Cristiano P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 42% |
| 13 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 60% | 10% |
| 14 | ANDERSON Jacob | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 15 | YEE Johnathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 30% | 4% |
| 16 | LIM Charles Q. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 2% |
| 17 | PARK Sky | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 2% | < 1% |
| 18 | SISINNI Riccardo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 78% | 32% | 3% |
| 19 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 15% |
| 20 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% |
| 21 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 19% |
| 22 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% | 36% | 4% |
| 22 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | 21% | 2% |
| 24 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 5% |
| 25 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 26 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 3% |
| 27 | CO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% |
| 28 | BAEK David | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 29 | SHEN Owen | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 2% |
| 30 | TEH Ryan | 100% | 99% | 85% | 45% | 11% | 1% |
| 31 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 98% | 80% | 31% | 4% | - |
| 32 | CHUANG Kian J. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 14% | 1% |
| 33 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 87% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | YU Leo | 100% | 100% | 95% | 61% | 18% | 1% |
| 35 | WU Lucas | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 36 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 24% | 3% |
| 37 | FANG Jaden | 100% | 89% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 38 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 96% | 54% | 9% | - | - |
| 39 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 94% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 40 | GONZALEZ Matthew | 100% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 41 | LI Jett | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
| 42 | LAM Nicolas | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | LIU William | 100% | 95% | 53% | 8% | - | - |
| 44 | BOUCHARD Kai | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 46 | PETERSON Lucas | 100% | 59% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 100% | 59% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 48 | ROMO Ian | 100% | 87% | 32% | 5% | - | - |
| 49 | ALBINALI Eissa | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 49 | POTTS Diego | 100% | 54% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 49 | REICHEL Ezra | 100% | 68% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | MAK Osman K. | 100% | 64% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 100% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 53 | KIM Jonah | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.