The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

December NAC

Cadet Women's Foil

Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 8:00 AM

Columbus, OH, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 ZHANG Yunjia V V V V V V V V V V V 4.2 5 +0.8
2 FANG Sabrina V D V V V V V V V V V D 5.6 5 -0.6
3 KIM Rachael V V V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
3 LEE Brianna J. V V V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
5 WANG Ellen V V V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
6 KONG Chin-Yi V V V V D V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
7 ZHAO Sophie L. V V D V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
8 GRIFFIN Emma G. V V D V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
9 JING Emily V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
10 SOOD Ishani S. V V V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
11 SHEN Lydia V V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
12 PEVZNER Victoria D V V V V V V V 5.0 5 -
13 LUNG Katerina V V V V D V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
14 NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" V V D V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
14 SHEN Sophia H. V V V D V V V V D 5.0 5 -
16 SENIC Adeline V D V V V D V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
17 LOCKE Savannah V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
18 GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
19 EYER Hailey M. V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
20 KIM Katherine V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
21 LIU Jaelyn A. V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
22 CHUSID Mikayla V V V D V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
23 TAN Kaitlyn N. V V V V V D V D 4.7 5 +0.3
24 LI Rachel Y. V V V V D V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
25 OH Erin H. V V V D V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
26 MEI Sarah V V V D V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
27 WANDJI Anais D V V V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
28 KOROL Neta D V V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
29 CHEN Jia P. V V D D V V V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
30 SUN Ruoxi D V V D V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
31 KOENIG Charlotte R. D V V V V D V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
32 CASTANEDA Erika L. D V V D V V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
33 SARTORI Taylor M. D V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
34 CHEN Jessie S. V V D V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
35 HO Brianna W. V V V V D D 4.5 4 -0.5
36 JANG Kimberley V V V V D D 3.5 4 +0.5
37 CHO Gracie L. D V V V V D V D 4.0 4 -
38 LIU Angel(Daying) D V D V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
39 COOPER Piper W. V V D V V D V D 2.7 4 +1.3
40 LEE Lavender V D V D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
41 DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia V V D V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
42 ZHANG Alina C. D V V D V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
43 HU Victoria V D V V D V D 1.9 3 +1.1
44 UPTON Elizabeth V D V V D D V D 3.0 3 -
45 DE LA CRUZ Eden V D D V V D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
46 LEE Ji Ahn V D D V V D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
47 GUERRA Sofia E. V V D D D V V D 3.0 3 -
47 BATRA Chaahat V D V D V D V D 3.7 3 -0.7
49 FERNANDES Thea D D V V D V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
50 WU Julianna Y. V D D V D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
51 CHEN Allison V. D D V D V V D 3.5 2 -1.5
52 KOSLOW Amicie D V V D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
53 CHO Cameron S. D D D V V V D 3.2 2 -1.2
54 YU Lauren C. D D V V D V D 2.8 2 -0.8
55 NISSINOFF Alexandra D V D D D V V D 3.5 2 -1.5
56 SEIGEL Norah D D D V V D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
57 GOOR Viviene E. D V V D D D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
58 MI Aileen D V D D D V V D 2.6 2 -0.6
59 SHITAMOTO Audrey F. V D D D V D V D 2.8 2 -0.8
60 ORVANANOS Anice D V D D D V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
61 DING Abigail D D D V D V V D 3.0 2 -1.0
61 HE Fenghuan D D D V D V V D 3.8 2 -1.8
63 NAMGALAURI Mariam D V D D V D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
64 CANNON Lira J. D D V D V D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
65 PENG Amber L. V D D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
66 PARK Jaimie Lina V V D D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
67 RANDOLPH Piper V D D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
68 WONG Sophia M. V V D V D D 2.4 3 +0.6
69 LUO Sandra J. V V V D D D 1.7 3 +1.3
70 SHIH Diane V D V D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
71 SOLDATOVA Maria D D V V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
72 KOSTELNY Alexis V D V D D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
73 LAMBERT Mahala D V V V D D D 2.8 3 +0.2
74 CHEN Chloe I. V D D V D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
75 GU EMILY V V V D D D D 2.6 3 +0.4
76 YU Jaime L. V D D V V D D 2.8 3 +0.2
77 TALWALKAR Apoorva D V D D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
78 HUANG NATALIE V V D D V D D 3.5 3 -0.5
79 BEAVER Kaitlyn D D D V V V D 1.1 3 +1.9
80 MORADI Raiyan N. D V D V D V D 2.1 3 +0.9
81 KONG Olivia D D V V D D 2.9 2 -0.9
82 DRAGNE Alexis D. V D D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
83 KO Claire D V D D V D 0.4 2 +1.6
84 CUI Amy D V D V D D 2.2 2 -0.2
85 XIANG Emma D V D V D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
86 ZHANG Rongrui D V V D D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
87 SEO IRENE Y. D D V D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
88 LIN Victoria T. D D V D V D D 1.2 2 +0.8
89 RASO Olivia V D D D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
90 CHO Rebecca H. V D V D D D D 3.8 2 -1.8
91 LEE Ariana D D D V V D D 2.7 2 -0.7
91 TOBIN Brean D V D D D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
91 WANG Alison D V V D D D D 1.2 2 +0.8
94 ASCHETTINO Aurora D D V V D D D 2.0 2 -
95 CHARALEL Jessica V D D D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
96 PHILLIPS Hattie D D D D V D 0.9 1 +0.1
97 SIMONOV Dasha D D D D V D 2.0 1 -1.0
98 QUINN Anna D D V D D 0.7 1 +0.3
99 KOROL Dana V D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
100 CHANG Elizabeth V D D D D D 3.0 1 -2.0
101 BURBERRY Livia V D D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
102 WILLIS Fletcher L. D D D V D D 1.5 1 -0.5
103 BEAVER Hannah D V D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
103 STRUGAR Steliana D D D V D D 1.5 1 -0.5
105 LIN Zhi tong D D V D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
106 ZAMELIS Madelyn D V D D D D 0.6 1 +0.4
107 BENNETT Abigail D D D D V D 0.4 1 +0.6
108 PARK Leah D D V D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
109 EUH Jayme D D D V D D 0.2 1 +0.8
110 DONDERIS Hannah E. D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
110 LIU Sophia D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
112 SHA Yi Ling D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
113 MARKOVSKY Nina D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
114 BOLES Amanda X. D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
115 LUH Mia P. D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
115 TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
117 MU Allison D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
118 NIRGUDE Siddhi D D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2
118 KUNDU TRISHA D D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1
120 ROLOFF Katarina M. D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.