The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

December NAC

Junior Women's Foil

Saturday, December 11, 2021 at 8:00 AM

Columbus, OH, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 FANG Sabrina - - - 4% 26% 46% 24%
2 LEE Alina - - - 4% 22% 44% 29%
3 CHO Sabrina N. - - - 1% 9% 37% 53%
3 CHUSID Mikayla - - 1% 6% 24% 42% 27%
5 GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. - - 2% 11% 34% 40% 14%
6 TAN Helen - - - 2% 21% 76%
7 LESLIE Ryanne T. - - - 4% 19% 42% 34%
8 HO Brianna W. - - 1% 6% 25% 43% 25%
9 CHENG Evelyn - - - - 6% 32% 62%
10 ZHANG Yunjia - - 2% 12% 31% 38% 17%
11 CATANTAN Samantha Kyle - - - - 3% 27% 70%
12 ZHANG Alina C. - 5% 20% 37% 30% 8%
13 KIM Katherine - 1% 6% 22% 40% 27% 5%
14 WANG Ellen - - 1% 9% 29% 41% 19%
15 KIM Rachael - - 2% 14% 42% 34% 8%
16 LEE Brianna J. - - 1% 8% 30% 43% 18%
17 SCRUGGS Lauren S. - - - - 1% 12% 88%
18 ZHENG Vivian - - - 4% 18% 42% 36%
19 HE Elizabeth W. - - 1% 9% 37% 53%
20 KOO Rachel A. - - 2% 10% 28% 40% 20%
21 JO Mia C. 1% 7% 24% 38% 26% 5%
22 SHEN Sophia H. - - 1% 7% 26% 42% 25%
23 CAO Arianna L. - - 4% 17% 34% 33% 12%
24 KONG Chin-Yi - - - 3% 17% 42% 38%
25 JANG Kimberley - 1% 8% 27% 38% 22% 3%
26 BREKER Anika - - 2% 11% 32% 40% 16%
27 SOOD Ishani S. - - 3% 16% 37% 34% 10%
28 PARK Rowan M. - - - 5% 22% 45% 28%
29 QIAN Crystal - - 2% 15% 42% 40%
30 OH Erin H. - 4% 21% 41% 28% 5%
31 SERBAN Samantha M. - 1% 7% 26% 41% 25%
32 XUE Alanna L. 6% 26% 37% 23% 6% 1%
33 HORSLEY Asherah - - - 2% 15% 44% 38%
33 LUNG Katerina - - - 4% 21% 47% 29%
35 FREEDMAN Miranda W. - - 4% 18% 35% 32% 10%
36 TUCKER ALARCON Ariadna C. - - - 3% 19% 46% 32%
37 GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa - - 5% 22% 41% 27% 6%
38 LIU Jaelyn A. - - 3% 18% 42% 34% 2%
39 HUNG Juliana K. - - 1% 5% 24% 45% 25%
40 CHEN Jessie S. - 1% 10% 29% 36% 20% 4%
41 SABATINI Isabella Ravenne - 1% 11% 32% 36% 17% 3%
42 PERLMAN Talia - 4% 17% 35% 31% 12% 1%
43 TAN Kaitlyn N. - 5% 22% 42% 27% 4%
44 LOCKE Savannah - - 3% 18% 38% 32% 8%
45 KHOO Lauren A. - - 3% 18% 40% 33% 6%
46 CHEN Allison V. - 2% 12% 33% 38% 14% 2%
47 BATRA Chaahat - 7% 27% 38% 22% 5% -
48 DAVIA Daniella V. - 1% 9% 30% 38% 19% 3%
49 LEE Annora Y. - - - 4% 22% 46% 28%
49 NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" - 4% 20% 35% 29% 11% 2%
49 WU Julianna Y. - 8% 34% 41% 15% 2% -
52 RANDOLPH Piper - 6% 25% 40% 24% 5% -
53 KOENIG Charlotte R. - - 4% 18% 38% 33% 8%
54 WEBB Ella 4% 22% 38% 27% 8% 1% -
55 CHO Cameron S. 2% 15% 34% 33% 14% 2%
56 EYER Hailey M. - 2% 13% 36% 38% 11%
57 STAMOS Maria - - 2% 13% 40% 45%
58 SUN Ruoxi 2% 14% 34% 34% 15% 2%
59 APELIAN Katherine - - 2% 13% 41% 44%
60 KLINE Melissa C. - 1% 6% 23% 38% 26% 6%
61 GRIFFIN Emma G. - - 1% 7% 28% 42% 21%
62 YAROSHENKO Karina - - - 2% 13% 40% 45%
63 ZHAO Aileen Y. 1% 9% 28% 36% 21% 5% -
64 SHENG Chuxi 7% 34% 39% 17% 3% - -
65 CHO Taylor S. - 5% 24% 42% 27% 2%
66 LI Grace Q. - - 1% 12% 35% 38% 14%
67 GOOR Viviene E. 1% 8% 28% 39% 20% 4% -
68 KOKES Gabrielle - 1% 8% 26% 38% 23% 4%
69 KOO Haley B. - - - 1% 18% 81%
70 PARK Jaimie Lina 23% 44% 26% 6% 1% -
71 ZHENG Ivy - - - 3% 18% 44% 35%
71 ZHAO Sophie L. - 1% 9% 31% 39% 18% 2%
73 COSTELLO Angeline S. - 4% 27% 40% 23% 6% -
74 LI Rachel Y. - 1% 7% 26% 39% 23% 4%
75 JING Emily - - - 2% 13% 41% 45%
76 YU Lauren C. - 4% 20% 39% 29% 8% -
77 KOROL Neta - 3% 17% 35% 32% 12% 2%
78 DRAGNE Alexis D. 7% 32% 42% 17% 3% - -
79 LI Phoebe J. - - 2% 16% 43% 35% 5%
80 TALAVERA Daena - - 1% 10% 33% 40% 16%
81 MCGILLION-MOORE Katie - 1% 7% 25% 38% 24% 5%
82 SHAW Kayla M. - 2% 12% 33% 37% 15% 2%
83 MI Aileen 1% 11% 37% 35% 14% 2% -
84 CHO Gracie L. - 3% 15% 34% 33% 14% 2%
85 LIU Angel(Daying) 1% 14% 37% 35% 12% 1%
86 SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. 1% 10% 30% 39% 19% 1%
87 NAMGALAURI Mariam 5% 25% 41% 24% 5% -
88 LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) 1% 12% 32% 37% 16% 1%
89 DU Hannah 3% 23% 41% 26% 6% -
90 SENIC Adeline - 1% 8% 28% 38% 22% 4%
91 PAHLAVI Dahlia - 4% 23% 44% 25% 5% -
92 CASTANEDA Erika L. - - 4% 18% 36% 32% 9%
93 MI Anning 1% 20% 47% 26% 5% - -
94 DING Abigail - 8% 30% 38% 19% 4% -
94 OUYANG Bridgette Z. - - 4% 19% 39% 30% 8%
96 GUERRA Sofia E. - 5% 22% 36% 27% 8% 1%
97 HE Fenghuan - 1% 8% 26% 38% 23% 5%
98 GAYDOS Sofia C. - - 3% 19% 44% 30% 4%
98 WANDJI Anais - 9% 28% 35% 21% 6% 1%
98 COOPER Piper W. 3% 18% 38% 30% 10% 1% -
101 SEIGEL Norah 3% 22% 40% 26% 7% 1% -
102 YIN Helen 9% 31% 37% 19% 4% - -
103 ADAMS KIM Natalie - 4% 20% 36% 29% 10% 1%
104 SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. 1% 11% 30% 35% 18% 4% -
105 CHEN Jia P. - 2% 15% 39% 36% 8%
106 DEBACK Greta I. - 5% 24% 41% 25% 4%
107 KOSTELNY Alexis 3% 16% 37% 33% 11% 1%
108 HALL Velma - 2% 14% 38% 36% 9%
109 ACHILOVA Feyza 1% 13% 33% 34% 15% 2%
110 CHO Rebecca H. 4% 22% 37% 28% 9% 1%
111 TALWALKAR Apoorva 1% 14% 36% 36% 12% 1%
112 MASSICK Laine - - 5% 23% 40% 26% 5%
113 UPTON Elizabeth 2% 13% 33% 35% 15% 2% -
114 TAN Clarisse 1% 9% 29% 36% 20% 4% -
115 KOROL Dana - 16% 43% 32% 7% 1% -
116 FERRETTI Anna Rebecca 3% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2% -
117 MILLER Naomi E. - 3% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2%
118 SARTORI Taylor M. - 2% 13% 37% 34% 12% 2%
119 KONG Olivia - 2% 15% 36% 33% 12% 2%
120 LUO ZIWEN - 2% 13% 35% 37% 13% -
121 SHEN Lydia - 1% 6% 22% 39% 28% 5%
121 HE Xiangxin - 1% 6% 24% 38% 25% 5%
123 LUO Sandra J. 2% 23% 39% 26% 8% 1% -
124 RASO Olivia 24% 43% 26% 7% 1% - -
125 SLOWINSKI Maia A. 2% 18% 36% 31% 12% 2%
126 XIANG Emma 24% 42% 26% 7% 1% -
127 ASCHETTINO Aurora 24% 43% 26% 7% 1% - -
128 SHITAMOTO Audrey F. 2% 18% 38% 30% 11% 2% -
129 KOSLOW Amicie 2% 18% 40% 29% 9% 1% -
130 YEH Marissa E. 2% 16% 36% 32% 11% 1% -
131 WONG Sophia M. - 2% 17% 37% 32% 11% 1%
132 SHIH Diane 7% 31% 41% 18% 3% -
133 HU Victoria 7% 34% 39% 17% 3% -
134 CUI Amy 16% 41% 32% 10% 1% -
135 BOLES Sophia 1% 16% 36% 31% 12% 2% -
136 YU Jaime L. 4% 23% 38% 26% 8% 1% -
137 DONDERIS Hannah E. 5% 33% 40% 18% 4% - -
138 SOLDATOVA Maria 5% 30% 40% 20% 4% - -
139 MARKOVSKY Nina 19% 43% 29% 8% 1% - -
140 SEO IRENE Y. 2% 14% 35% 34% 13% 2% -
141 PENG Amber L. 3% 18% 36% 30% 11% 2% -
142 ZHANG Eunice 16% 39% 32% 11% 2% - -
143 GU EMILY 5% 25% 38% 24% 7% 1% -
143 CHANG Elizabeth 7% 33% 38% 18% 4% - -
145 ZHANG Rongrui 3% 43% 41% 12% 1% - -
146 GEYER Carolina M. 6% 26% 38% 23% 6% 1% -
147 LEE Ji Ahn 32% 42% 21% 5% - - -
148 LIN Victoria T. 39% 43% 16% 2% - - -
148 LUH Mia P. 49% 38% 11% 2% - - -
150 BEAVER Kaitlyn 57% 35% 7% 1% - -
151 BEAVER Hannah 54% 36% 9% 1% - -
151 MEI Sarah 6% 32% 40% 19% 3% -
153 CHEN Chloe I. 16% 39% 32% 11% 1% -
154 LEE Ariana 2% 15% 37% 33% 11% 1% -
155 BRADFORD Meeah 2% 13% 32% 34% 16% 3% -
156 MORADI Raiyan N. 3% 42% 41% 13% 1% - -
157 LAURIA Mariavittoria 13% 36% 33% 14% 3% - -
158 DE LA CRUZ Eden 1% 8% 29% 39% 19% 4% -
159 KENNEDY Elizabeth 36% 44% 17% 2% - - -
160 LAMBERT Mahala - 16% 36% 32% 13% 3% -
161 HUANG NATALIE 1% 10% 34% 37% 16% 3% -
161 SHA Yi Ling 4% 30% 41% 21% 4% - -
163 SIMONOV Dasha 2% 21% 40% 28% 8% 1% -
163 STRUGAR Steliana 17% 43% 30% 9% 1% - -
165 MU Allison 65% 30% 5% - - - -
166 LONG Madeline M. 7% 35% 38% 16% 3% - -
167 ROLOFF Katarina M. 7% 47% 35% 10% 1% - -
168 ZAMELIS Madelyn 71% 25% 3% - - - -
169 TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol 58% 37% 5% - - - -
170 CHARALEL Jessica 22% 54% 20% 3% - - -
171 ORVANANOS Anice 2% 23% 42% 25% 6% 1% -
172 QUINN Anna 72% 24% 3% - - - -
173 ZHUANG Sophie 51% 38% 10% 1% - - -
174 LIN Zhi tong 29% 44% 22% 4% - -
175 WANG Alison 55% 36% 8% 1% - - -
176 LIU Sophia 17% 44% 31% 8% 1% - -
177 FERNANDES Thea 26% 41% 25% 7% 1% -
178 SCARLETT Skye 43% 46% 10% 1% - - -
179 OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. 25% 45% 24% 5% - -
179 MEYER Claudia 58% 34% 7% 1% - -
181 BOLES Amanda X. 32% 45% 20% 4% - - -
182 GAO Anna 74% 24% 2% - - - -
183 HAAS Claire 32% 42% 21% 5% 1% - -
184 JACINTO JENNA R. 39% 42% 16% 3% - - -
184 ANTAL Chandini 74% 23% 2% - - - -
184 YANICELLI Sloane 93% 7% - - - - -
187 WILLIS Fletcher L. 20% 42% 28% 8% 1% - -
187 NIRGUDE Siddhi 88% 11% - - - - -
189 EUH Jayme 88% 11% - - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.