The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

December NAC

Cadet Women's Saber

Sunday, December 12, 2021 at 12:00 PM

Columbus, OH, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 POSSICK Lola P. V D V V V V V V V V V V 5.2 5 -0.2
2 LEE Alexandra B. D V V V V V V V V V V D 5.5 5 -0.5
3 LEE Hannah V D V V D V V V V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
3 SHOMAN Jenna V V V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
5 SZETO Chloe V V V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
6 MIKA Veronica D V V V V V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
7 CALLAHAN Chase J. D V V V V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
8 ANDRES Charmaine G. D V D V V V V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
9 FREEDMAN Janna N. V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
10 LI Amanda C. V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
11 HWANG Gabriela M. V V V V V V V V D 3.6 6 +2.4
11 ANDRES Katherine A. V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
13 LIU Sophie V V D V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
14 ALCEBAR Kayla V V V D D V V V D 4.0 4 -
15 CHIN Sophia J. V D D V V V V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
16 CHEN Xiaohan D V D V D V V V D 3.5 2 -1.5
17 XU Ellen V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
18 KIM Marley I. V V V V V V V D 3.7 6 +2.3
19 YANG Angelina LeLe D V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
20 BEVACQUA Aria F. D V V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
21 SOURIMTO Valeria D V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
22 GHAYALOD reya V D V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
23 HILD Nisha V D V D V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
24 LU Amy D D V V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
25 BLUM Leah I. D V V D V V V D 5.1 4 -1.1
26 DANK Dina V D V D V V V D 4.0 4 -
27 CHIOLDI Mina V V D V V D V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
28 LU Elaine D V V D V V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
29 SINHA Anika D D D V V V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
30 BUHAY Rachel T. V D D V V D V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
31 KANTIPUDI Shrika D V D V D D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
32 NATH Trisha D V D D V D V V D 3.0 2 -1.0
33 GORMAN Victoria M. V V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
34 ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. V V V D V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
35 JUNG Irene V V V V V D D 3.9 5 +1.1
36 JULIEN Michelle V D V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
37 PAUL Lila V V V D V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
38 WIGGERS Susan Q. D V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
39 CODY Alexandra C. V V V V D V D 4.7 5 +0.3
40 KER Grace V V D V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
41 DELSOIN Chelsea C. V V D V V D 5.2 4 -1.2
42 YUAN Greta V V V D D V D 3.8 4 +0.2
43 MCKEE Brynnley V D V D V V V D 1.8 4 +2.2
44 BOIS Adele V D V D V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
45 SHTREVENSKY Maria V V V D V D V D 4.3 4 -0.3
46 XIAO julie D D V V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
47 VADASZ Ibla P. D V D V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
48 PRIEUR Lauren V D V V D D V D 4.1 3 -1.1
49 MAKLIN Sofia V V D V D D V D 3.0 3 -
50 LIGH Erenei J. D V D V D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
51 LEE Sophia V D V D V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
52 LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA V D D D V V V D 1.7 3 +1.3
53 WEI Vivian W. D V D D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
54 HENRY Soraya S. D V V V D D V D 1.6 3 +1.4
55 TSUI Natalie V D D D V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
56 NGUYEN Ella D D D V V V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
57 SUBRAMANIAN Nitika V V D D D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
58 WU Helen V D V D D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
59 TABANGAY Heartlyn D D V D V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
60 CHEN Ashley V D V D D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
61 BALAKUMARAN Maya V D D V D D V D 3.6 2 -1.6
62 DONG Angel V D D D D V V D 1.9 2 +0.1
63 GRAFF Sophie V D V D D D V D 3.2 2 -1.2
64 SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. D V D D D V D 2.9 1 -1.9
65 ERIKSON Kira R. D V V V V D D 3.1 4 +0.9
66 LIAO Siwen D D V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
67 SHINCHUK Ellisha V V V D D V D 2.3 4 +1.7
68 FAN Grace D V V V V D D 1.8 4 +2.2
69 HAMBAZAZA Liisa D V V D V V D 1.7 4 +2.3
70 JEONG Katie D V D V D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
71 JOHNSON Dagny L. V D V V D D D 3.1 3 -0.1
72 NYSTROM Sofia C. D D V V D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
73 ZHANG Chenfei D V V D D V D 2.1 3 +0.9
74 BARNOVITZ Maya V D D V V D D 2.2 3 +0.8
75 PENG Florella V V D D V D D 3.0 3 -
76 NATHANSON Sammy E. V V D V D D D 3.4 3 -0.4
77 OBRADOVIC Ana V V D D V D D 2.3 3 +0.7
78 BUHAY Kirsten M. D V V D V D D 1.6 3 +1.4
79 SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. D V D D V V D 3.0 3 -
80 CHEN Xinyan V D D V V D D 3.4 3 -0.4
81 ZENG Megan V V V D D D D 1.8 3 +1.2
82 CHANG Audrey V D V D D D 1.2 2 +0.8
83 HUNG Anna V D D V D D D 3.0 2 -1.0
84 JOHNSON Lydia V D D V D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
85 SADOVA Olga V D V D D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
86 JOHNSTON Lily D V D V D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
87 YANG Lea V V D D D D D 2.6 2 -0.6
88 SHI Julia D V D V D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
89 KHAN Alissa V D D D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
90 CHIANG Emily V D D V D D D 3.0 2 -1.0
91 LI Angela D D D D V V D 1.5 2 +0.5
92 ALFARACHE Gabriella C. D V D D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
93 MANSPERGER Leena V D V D D D D 3.1 2 -1.1
94 SO Catelyn D D V D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
95 BAWA Anahat V D D D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
96 SPRINGER Ella D D D V D D D 2.4 1 -1.4
97 EVANS Madelynn D D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
98 CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. D D D V D D 1.6 1 -0.6
99 WANG Jianning D V D D D D 2.4 1 -1.4
100 ELNATAN Mica A. D D D D D V 1.4 1 -0.4
101 RAMIREZ Mirka A. D V D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
102 JENKINS Scotland D D D V D D 1.4 1 -0.4
103 COLBY Mercer D D V D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
104 HE Lizbeth D D D V D D 2.9 1 -1.9
105 MORAN Rhea D D D D D V 1.1 1 -0.1
106 WEI JoyAnn D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
106 LO JOCELYN D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
108 MCKEE Ainsley D D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
109 SHUM Cindy D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
109 NEELEY Leilani D D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2
109 FANG sophie D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
109 KUANG TongFei D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
113 HUANG MADELINE D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
114 YU Zhiang D D D D D D 2.6 0 -2.6
115 KOKAL Genevieve D D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1
115 SCHICK Veronica D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.