The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Jersey Clash RYC/RJCC

Junior Men's Épée

Saturday, October 16, 2021 at 4:00 PM

Monroe 33 Tennis, Basketball and Sports - Monroe Township, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 GANA Jr Jorge M. - - - 3% 18% 42% 37%
2 WOZNIAK Ignacy - - - 2% 13% 40% 45%
3 ZHAO Luhan - 1% 5% 18% 34% 31% 11%
3 ZHANG Zan 1% 7% 25% 36% 23% 7% 1%
5 MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. - - 2% 13% 33% 36% 14%
6 GAO Daniel - 1% 7% 21% 34% 28% 9%
7 BORODITSKY Ethan - 1% 5% 19% 36% 31% 8%
8 KOKENGE Reid - 2% 9% 25% 34% 24% 6%
9 SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. - - - 2% 11% 39% 48%
10 BEZRODNOV Michael - 1% 4% 17% 34% 33% 12%
11 CHEN Eric - - 2% 13% 33% 37% 15%
12 MORSE Tyler - - 2% 12% 30% 38% 18%
13 CHAI Jonathan 1% 8% 23% 33% 25% 9% 1%
14 ZENG Zihan - 1% 6% 23% 37% 26% 7%
15 LAI Coby - - 5% 20% 36% 30% 9%
16 DISIMONE David Z. - 5% 17% 31% 30% 14% 3%
17 PRIHODKO Max - - 2% 14% 37% 38% 10%
18 NOVOJILOV Alexei - 2% 15% 33% 33% 15% 2%
19 KUDRIAVTCEV Sergei - - 5% 22% 44% 29%
20 PERSAUD Daivik - 1% 9% 27% 37% 21% 3%
21 LIEF Isaac R. - - 4% 15% 32% 34% 15%
22 YANG Edward 3% 16% 33% 31% 14% 3% -
23 SIMPSON Patrick - 3% 12% 28% 33% 20% 4%
24 BEZRODNOV Alexander - 2% 13% 35% 37% 13%
25 KOBI Samuel - 2% 12% 30% 35% 17% 3%
26 LEE Hudson - 2% 13% 30% 34% 18% 3%
27 DIXON Thomas - - 3% 14% 32% 35% 15%
28 STALL-RYAN Jonathan - 4% 22% 38% 27% 8% 1%
29 KUMAR Aidan - 3% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2%
30 PARK Brian 1% 8% 23% 33% 25% 9% 1%
31 CHEN Matthew 30% 43% 21% 5% 1% - -
32 CAO Brad 1% 9% 25% 34% 23% 7% 1%
33 SERAFIN Ben - 1% 11% 32% 37% 17% 2%
34 WU Marcus 1% 8% 25% 34% 24% 8% 1%
35 HE Lawrence - - 2% 13% 32% 36% 16%
36 GORTI Agustya 3% 16% 34% 31% 14% 3% -
37 GONG Haixiang 3% 18% 35% 29% 12% 2% -
38 BANKULLA Nihal R. 1% 8% 24% 34% 24% 8% 1%
39 TUMIBAY Noah C. - 5% 24% 40% 25% 5%
40 POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. 1% 15% 37% 33% 12% 1%
41 ROSENBERG Jacob 2% 14% 31% 32% 16% 4% -
42 HAN Dongcheng 1% 7% 23% 33% 25% 10% 1%
43 CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. - 5% 18% 32% 29% 13% 2%
44 SHEN Max - 1% 7% 24% 38% 25% 5%
45 LAI Aedin 5% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1% -
46 MAHESH Tarun 9% 28% 34% 21% 7% 1% -
47 SUN Jeffery 14% 44% 31% 9% 1% - -
48 BLANCHARD Jonah 5% 23% 38% 25% 8% 1% -
49 SINGH Aryaman 17% 36% 31% 13% 3% - -
49 MILLER Kurt 31% 42% 21% 5% 1% - -
51 WOZNIAK Fryderyk 1% 9% 27% 36% 22% 5% -
52 WADE Grayson - 1% 9% 27% 36% 21% 5%
53 CHOE Andrew 2% 14% 31% 32% 17% 4% -
54 BEAUCHESNE Rudy 4% 19% 33% 28% 13% 3% -
55 MING Isaac 24% 43% 25% 6% 1% - -
56 HU Robert J. 48% 38% 12% 2% - - -
57 KUCHARCZYK Ryan T. 46% 41% 12% 1% - - -
58 UPSHAW Micah 10% 39% 36% 13% 2% -
59 SUN Jason 6% 26% 38% 23% 7% 1% -
60 CHEN Jun Ho 2% 13% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
61 PRAKASH Nikhil 1% 12% 36% 35% 14% 2% -
62 REDDY Arya 17% 46% 29% 7% 1% - -
63 LYNCH Morgan 6% 24% 37% 25% 8% 1% -
64 XIE Brandon 32% 41% 21% 5% 1% - -
65 CAO Albert 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
66 FENG du 20% 42% 29% 8% 1% - -
67 KIM Dylan 47% 40% 11% 1% - - -
68 ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) 28% 41% 24% 6% 1% - -
69 SHULKIN Mark 55% 37% 8% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.