The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

November NAC

Y-14 Women's Épée

Saturday, November 10, 2018 at 11:00 AM

Kansas City, MO - Kansas City, MO, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 PARK Faith K. V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.1 6 +0.9
2 WANG Karen V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
3 KHROL Caralina V V V V D V V V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
3 JOYCE Michaela V V V V V V V V V V D 5.7 6 +0.3
5 DING Jiahe (Heidi) V V V V V V V V V D 4.3 6 +1.7
6 KETKAR Ketki V V V V V D V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
7 WANG Elizabeth V V V D V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
8 ROBLES Elena V V D V V V V V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
9 MALDONADO Pilar I. V V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
10 PATURU Meghana V V V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
11 O'DONNELL Amanda A. V D V V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
12 WADE-CURRIE Ava S. V V D V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
13 CHAN Elizabeth V D V V V V V V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
14 ZHU Heidi V V D V V D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
15 GANDHI Sedna S. D V V D V D V V V D 4.5 3 -1.5
16 MILEWSKI Nicole D V D D V V V V D 2.1 2 -0.1
17 WATRALL Christina V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
18 MACHULSKY Leehi V D V V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
19 DANIEL Olivia V V V V V D V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
20 ZAFFT Tatiana M. V V V V V D V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
21 TYLER Syd V V V V V D V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
22 GABERKORN Nadia V D V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
23 WU Amelia V D V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
24 KUZNETSOV Victoria V V V V V D V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
25 ZHENG Ava V V V V D V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
26 KETKAR Mallika V V V D D V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
27 CHEN Zhengnan(Janet) V D V D V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
28 LEANG Priscilla Y. D V D V V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
29 GU Sarah V D V V V D V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
30 GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. D V D D V V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
31 MCLANE Lauren V D V V D D V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
32 CHEUNG Ho Huen D D D D V D V V D 1.7 1 -0.7
33 NGUYEN Kaylin A. V V V V V V D 3.8 6 +2.2
34 LU Shiqi V V V V V D 1.9 5 +3.1
35 KHAMIS Yasmine A. V V V D V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
36 CAPELLUA Mariasole V D V V V V V D 2.1 5 +2.9
37 OGAWA Kaylin V V V V D V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
38 LEUNG Natalie V V V V D V D 2.5 4 +1.5
39 ZUHARS Renee A. D V V D V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
40 MILLETTE Marie Frederique V D V V D V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
41 AHUJA Arianna V D V D V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
42 XU Grace (XinYi) D V D V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
43 YANG Miranda (Yinuo) D V V D V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
44 BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. V D D V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
45 REID Sobia D V V V V D V D 3.0 4 +1.0
46 LEE Sumin V V D D V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
47 WANG Nora V V V D V D V D 3.0 4 +1.0
48 BURN Lauren M. D V V D V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
49 DROVETSKY Alexandra M. D D V V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
50 KIM Diane E. V D V D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
51 LIU Christina A. D D V V V D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
52 SUN Angelica D D V V V D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
53 LIN Katie Y. V D D V D V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
54 WANG anne V D V D V D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
55 CHAN Cheri K. D V V D D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
56 REID Anousheh D V V D D V V D 3.0 3 -
57 DOUGLAS Julia F. D V V D D V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
58 LAVERY Chloe K. D D V V D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
59 XING Carol V V D D V D V D 3.0 3 -
60 SMITH Grace L. V D D D V D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
61 CHIN Isabella V D D D D V V D 4.4 2 -2.4
62 BARRETT Elisabeth D V D D D V V D 2.6 2 -0.6
63 SMUK Daria A. D D D V D V D 3.4 1 -2.4
64 GALLON Maya S. D D D D V D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
65 KIM Erika S. D V V V V D 0.7 4 +3.3
66 MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) D V V V V D D 4.1 4 -0.1
67 LOWENSTEIN Penelope J. V V D V D V D 4.1 4 -0.1
68 LIN Waiyuk D V V V V D D 2.7 4 +1.3
69 MUCSI Angela Lilla V V D D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
70 NING Emma D V D V V D D 3.6 3 -0.6
71 HU Grace D D V D V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
72 LUO Ashley D V V D D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
73 MEHROTRA Anya D V V V D D D 4.7 3 -1.7
74 SEMIKIN Julia D D V V V D D 3.9 3 -0.9
75 MOSKOFF Tessa D D V V D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
76 OPERARIO Abigail Z. V V D D V D D 1.6 3 +1.4
76 SHEN Stephanie V V D V D D D 2.3 3 +0.7
78 BUCUR Naomi V V V D D D D 3.3 3 -0.3
79 SHUM Jessica D D D D V V D 1.2 2 +0.8
80 ELLENT Isabella S. D D D D V V D 2.1 2 -0.1
81 FALLON Kyle R. V V D D D D D 4.0 2 -2.0
82 JIN Jasmine D V V D D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
83 KIM Elizabeth Y. D V D D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
84 TAYLOR Kiera S. V D D V D D D 3.2 2 -1.2
85 WU Fan D V V D D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
86 ZHANG Tina V D D D D V D 3.6 2 -1.6
87 SON Katherine (Injee) D V D D D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
88 GUMAGAY Erika L. V D D D D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
89 ANDERSON Nora E. V V D D D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
90 LI Bingqi V D V D D D D 3.2 2 -1.2
91 DESAI Meera P. D V D D D V D 3.9 2 -1.9
92 RUMMEL Katherine E. D D V V D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
93 PARTE Isabella B. V D D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
94 SAAL Anna V D D D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
95 MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. D D D D V D D 1.6 1 -0.6
96 DUAN Jenny S. D D V D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
97 GORNOVSKY Abigail D D V D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
97 KIM Annabelle V D D D D D D 0.6 1 +0.4
99 GLICK Nina D D D V D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
100 PADHYE Tanishka D D D D V D D 3.8 1 -2.8
101 SHERTZ Kira E. D D D V D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
102 YU Nicole J. D V D D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
103 SINHA Zara D D D V D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
104 SU Vera D D V D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
105 QURESHI Nisa D D D D D D D 2.5 0 -2.5
106 RUNIONS Emersyn D D D D D D 3.3 0 -3.3
107 PALMER Amelia C. D D D D D D D 2.7 0 -2.7
108 HAMILTON Nina M. D D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
109 DARANOUVONG Logan D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
110 YU Bailey D D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
111 TERRELL Gabriella D D D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1
112 MACEDON Gianna D D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3
112 JOYAL Anne-Sophie D D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
114 ZHENG Linden D D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
116 DILLE Carolina G. D D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
117 LEWIS Frances Morgan D D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.