Troy, MI - Troy, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | SENIC Adeline | - | - | - | 4% | 34% | 63% |
| 2 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 54% |
| 3 | BAWA Sahana | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 3 | YAO Ada | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 27% | 5% |
| 5 | PHILLIPS Hattie | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 11% | |
| 6 | BURBERRY Livia | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 7 | SKOURLETOS Maria | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 8 | LICHTENSTEIGER Megan | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 9 | DESERANNO Seren | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
| 10 | COHEN Ava | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 11 | HANNAH Abigail | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 12 | ANSARI Zaina | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 13 | SEO odelia | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | MORSE Katherine | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 15 | STONE Sydney | 11% | 37% | 38% | 13% | - | - |
| 16 | AADHI Hansika | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 17 | SONG Ella | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 29% | 3% |
| 18 | ZHAO Aimee | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | KIM Elisa | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 20 | MALONE Ella | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 21 | CHENG Emily | < 1% | 1% | 11% | 38% | 47% | 3% |
| 22 | HAN Katherine | 6% | 37% | 41% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 23 | SISK Elena | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.