Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | UM Ethan A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% | |
| 2 | CHEN Andrew | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 28% |
| 3 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 3 | BAS Liam | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 5 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 6 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
| 7 | BRUK Peter J. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
| 8 | LIN Dashiell | - | 1% | 13% | 38% | 39% | 9% | |
| 9 | KIM Nicholas W. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 46% | 33% |
| 10 | FU Samuel Y. | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 27% | 4% | |
| 11 | ONIK Elijah T. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% |
| 12 | LEE Aidan | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
| 13 | HOOSHI Dylan | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 28% | |
| 14 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 23% | |
| 14 | GODZHIK Zachary | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
| 16 | ZHANG Andy W. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 27% | |
| 17 | DAI Jonathan T. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 18 | HUTH Mitchell | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 44% | 26% |
| 19 | WONG Adam L. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 20 | SONG Leonardo T. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 21 | WU Alexander | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% | |
| 22 | KWON Ethan | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
| 23 | LI Raphael C. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 24 | CULLIVAN Justice | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 36% | 10% | |
| 25 | CHEN Allen | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% | |
| 26 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
| 27 | KIM Yonjae | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 11% |
| 28 | OH Jonathan | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 29 | LUH Ethan K. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 30 | SINGH Dayaal | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 33% | |
| 31 | YANG Luao | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 32 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 33 | CHIN Julian S. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 34 | LO Conrad | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 53% |
| 35 | BAE Kevin | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 36 | SHA Yi Peng | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 37 | BANERJEE ANUP | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
| 38 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 39 | ZHOU Oscar J. | 4% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 14% | |
| 41 | JEON Caleb A. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 22% |
| 42 | SICHITIU Alexander | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
| 43 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 44 | WU Nicholas | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 14% |
| 45 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 10% |
| 46 | HOOSHI Jayden | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
| 47 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 48 | ZHAI Jeffrey | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 49 | VAZQUEZ Zander | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 50 | CHENG Jonathan | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 8% | |
| 51 | JI Aidan Y. | 8% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 52 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 53 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 54 | GONG Benjamin | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 55 | DANKAR Neel | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 55 | GATZA Logan | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 57 | YU Anders | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 58 | GAO William | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 59 | WYMAN Julian | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 60 | KHER Roan | 8% | 33% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 61 | LIN Michael | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 62 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 63 | BING Charles | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 64 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | - | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 65 | WOO Christian | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 66 | NAGER Noah | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 67 | SIU Aiden | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 68 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 69 | LI Richard | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 27% |
| 70 | DIERKS Kian | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 71 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 1% | 7% | 28% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 72 | GUO Sean | 3% | 18% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 73 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 16% | 36% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 74 | KIM Andrew J. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 75 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 24% | 49% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 76 | MURRAY Maximo | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 77 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 32% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 78 | WU Jerry Z. | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 79 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 80 | LI Owen | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 81 | KEE Andrew L. | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 82 | ZHENG zhe | 12% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 83 | KIM Jackson | - | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 84 | KIM Ryan Y. | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 85 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 86 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 87 | TAN Christien | 7% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 88 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 89 | PO Oliver | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 90 | LI Avery Peihong | 7% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 91 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 92 | SEAL Maximus R. | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 93 | TANG Owen S. | 2% | 16% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 94 | REYES Omar | 10% | 34% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 95 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 96 | TAN Peter | 24% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 97 | WECHSLER Jacob | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 98 | ZHEN Ethan | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 98 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 11% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 100 | WONG Adrian | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 101 | NGUYEN William | 93% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 102 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | - | 23% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 103 | OH Jaden | 11% | 39% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 104 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 1% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 104 | GONZALEZ Matthew | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 106 | NAM Michael | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 106 | CHAMBERS Eli | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 108 | LI Matthew | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 109 | GOGOI Vir K. | 2% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 110 | BAEK David | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 111 | BERNABE Rafael | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 112 | BERK Theodore | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 113 | JIANG Owen | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 114 | DINSAY Kristjan | 32% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 115 | CHUANG Kian J. | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 116 | HSIAO Nicholas | 41% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 117 | NGUYEN Liam | 53% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 118 | STRUGAR Marcus A. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 119 | FARRELL Spencer | 95% | 5% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 120 | KIM Harrison | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.