Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JI Cody Walter | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 2 | YUN Jake | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 36% | 7% |
| 3 | HO Kaden M. | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% | |
| 3 | SO Hananiah | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 5 | CHON Taylor A. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
| 6 | WU Mengke | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% |
| 7 | FENG Leo | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 8 | KOTOV Leonid | 1% | 6% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
| 9 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 30% | 64% |
| 9 | DHINGRA Gian K. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
| 11 | TONG ZACHARY | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 12 | HONG Vincent Q. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 13 | WANG Eric Y. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 14 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% |
| 15 | JIANG Anthony | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% | |
| 16 | LINSKY Matthew | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 17 | LIANG Connor | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
| 18 | HOUTZ Jackson | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | |
| 19 | CHIN Matthew W. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | |
| 20 | YUN Jaesun | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 11% |
| 21 | KIM Shaun M. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 22 | WOODWARD Connor | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
| 23 | SHOMAN Noah | 2% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 24 | SIMAK Joseph P. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 24 | LEE Justin | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 26 | NOBLE Colin | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 27 | MARGULIES William | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 28 | GUZZO Vito | - | 5% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 4% | |
| 29 | BULL Anderson | - | 4% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 4% | |
| 30 | HAN Daniel Y. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 31 | ATANASSOV Vasil V. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 32 | HONG Steven | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 33 | TANN Justin | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 34 | KIM Alexander M. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 35 | LUKASHENKO Darii | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 35 | ERMAKOV Lev | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 37 | BERMAN Luca | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 38 | GHAYALOD ansh | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 39 | YANG Duncan (BoTong) | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 40 | HUANG Alexander C. | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 41 | DU Gavin J. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | |
| 42 | FERNANDEZ Rodrigo | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
| 43 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 44 | XU Andrew | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 45 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 46 | HOLZ Daniel | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
| 47 | STONE Esmond A. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 48 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 2% |
| 49 | CHOI Silas | 4% | 18% | 32% | 28% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 50 | CHEONG Heonjae | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 51 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 30% | 17% | 4% |
| 52 | KAKEHI Nicholas B. | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 53 | COLE Alexander | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 54 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 55 | MORRILL William | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 55 | ZHENG Edward L. | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 57 | QIU Nathan | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 57 | HOLZ William A. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 59 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | 2% | 10% | 26% | 32% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 60 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 1% | 9% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 61 | XU William | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | |
| 62 | SWORDS Evan F. | 3% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 63 | DOLAN Charles R. | - | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 64 | ZHANG Yankun | 16% | 43% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | SANDERS Samuel B. | - | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 66 | ZUBATIY Samuel | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 33% | 27% | 9% |
| 67 | CHEN Evan P. | 11% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 68 | WU Richard | 23% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | ZHOU Miles | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 70 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
| 71 | POPE Nico | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 72 | REN James | 2% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 73 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 5% |
| 74 | ALTIRS Giorgio | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | OVERDECK Andrew | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 76 | RHEE Ethan N. | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
| 76 | KUMAR Sachit | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 78 | LEE Aydan J. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 79 | RAJAN Advait | 24% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | BONSELL Vance | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 81 | CHANG Colin S. | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% | |
| 82 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | |
| 83 | MOULTON Ian | 34% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 84 | HJERPE Wade H. | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 85 | DENG Andrew | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 86 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | 2% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 87 | OH Triton | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 87 | BONN-ELCHONESS Peter | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 89 | LU Caleb Q. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 90 | HUANG Tom | 7% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 91 | KUSHKOV Veniamin | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 92 | RADY-PENTEK Charles A. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 92 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 94 | LIN Daniel | 3% | 15% | 30% | 30% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 95 | LIU Christopher X. | 8% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 96 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 8% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 97 | YANG Ziyi | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
| 97 | ZHOU Brian | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 99 | AVAKIAN Alec | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 100 | TANG Alex Y. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 101 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 102 | WANG Nicolas | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 103 | ZHOU Aeres Z. | 3% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 104 | MISHRA Aadi | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 105 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 106 | ZHANG Derek | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 107 | NG Jeremiah | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 108 | PIWOWAR Alex | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 109 | SCHERER Max | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 110 | VO Minh Q. | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 110 | GHENEA George Philipe | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | |
| 112 | KIM Ryan | 37% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 113 | CHEN Leo | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
| 114 | LANNAMAN Connor | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 115 | BERRIO Carter E. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 116 | BROU Inkosi | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 117 | KIM Andrew H. | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 6% |
| 118 | ZHANG Jeffrey | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 119 | CHEONG Heonjun | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 120 | ZHU Charlie | 36% | 41% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
| 121 | LEUNG Nathan | 3% | 32% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 122 | CHAN Aidan | 1% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 123 | DUDNICK Christian | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 124 | PERRON Robert | 10% | 43% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 125 | VELTZ Tyler J. | 86% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 126 | GRATHWOL-SEAR Oliver | 14% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 126 | WANG Liuao | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 128 | MONSON Eli | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.