New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MARX Jackson L. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 2 | ZHEN Ethan | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 3 | XU Andy P. | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 3 | GUO Justin | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 5 | XU Ethan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
| 6 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
| 7 | LIU Derek | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
| 8 | SHAO Eric | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | LIN James G. | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
| 10 | XIE Brandon | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 2% | |
| 11 | CHEN Kyle P. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 12 | LI Aaron | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 13 | ONIK Ari N. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 14 | LIEW Jeremy K. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | LEE Jonah | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 16 | CHENG Ethan | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 17 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | 8% | 37% | 39% | 14% | 1% | |
| 19 | HONG Logan | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 20 | LEE Brendan | 15% | 43% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | AROUH Dylan | 13% | 40% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | FRUSZTAJER Miklosh | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | CATINO William | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | BOSCO-SCHMIDT Tyler | 12% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | ZELTSER Eric S. | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.