Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | FORTUNE Alex | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 2 | LYUTIKOV Yegor | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 3 | ZHAO Jason L. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | ZHAO Sophie | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 5 | WANG Eric J | V D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | CHO Jeremy | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 7 | BRIEN Jeremy | V V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 8 | CHAN Matthew | V D V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 9 | BLAKEMAN Michael | V V V D V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 10 | SMITH Erick | V V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 11 | BOLARIN Oluwatosin N. | D V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 11 | PALWAI Suhas | V V D V D V | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 14 | FISHER Austin | V D V V V D | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 15 | CLAYPOOL Conner | D V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 16 | MILLER Daniel | D V D V D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 17 | DENMAN Kirsten S. | V D V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 18 | SMITH Cooper | V D V D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 19 | LEE Claire | D V V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 20 | POPOLOW Alexander | V V V D D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 | |
| 21 | DENMAN Matthew L | V D V D D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 22 | ZHAO Zhiyong | V D D D V D | D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 23 | PINKERTON Joseph (Joe) | D D D V V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 24 | MARTIN Maximilian | D V D D V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 25 | BLACKLEDGE Michael | D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 26 | PRIJATEL John R. | D D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 27 | GOSMEYER Matthew | D D D D D V | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 27 | MOROZE Daniel | D V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 29 | FISHER Racheal | D D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 30 | DENIHAN John | D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 31 | DEMOSS Mercedes | D D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 31 | SOARE Maria Elena | D D D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 33 | PETRIKIN Annika | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 34 | BERNWANGER Phillip | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.