The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

USA Fencing National Championships & July Challenge

Div I Women's Foil

Saturday, July 2, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Minneapolis, MN, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 WEINTRAUB Maia M. V V V V V V V V V V V 4.5 5 +0.5
2 PUSTILNIK Nicole V V V V V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
3 DESCHNER Stefani K. V V V V V D V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
3 RHODES Zander D V V V V D V V V V D 5.2 4 -1.2
5 SCRUGGS Lauren S. V V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
6 CHO Sabrina N. V V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
7 JING Emily V V V V V V V V V D 3.7 6 +2.3
8 BLOW Iman (Mani) A. V D V V V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
9 GUO Jessica Zi Jia V V V V V V V V D 5.7 6 +0.3
10 STUTCHBURY Carolina J. V V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
11 KIM Rachael V V V V D V V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
12 CAO Arianna L. V V V D V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
13 DEVORE Delphine P. V V V V D V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
14 LEE Alina V D D V V V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
15 TIEU May L. D V V D V V V V D 5.2 4 -1.2
16 TAFFEL sara V V D V D V V V V D 5.1 4 -1.1
17 NOTT Adrienne (Adi) M. V V V V V V V D 4.3 6 +1.7
18 KONG Chin-Yi V V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
19 PETROVA Kristina V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
20 ZEISS Madison E. V D V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
21 WANG Ellen V V D V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
22 GRIFFIN Emma G. V V D V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
23 SHEN Sophia H. D V V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
24 MYRONIUK Dariia V D D V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
25 LESLIE Ryanne T. V D D V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
26 YAROSHENKO Karina V V D D V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
27 LEE Brianna J. D V V V V D V D 4.1 4 -0.1
28 LUONG Paige K. V D D V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
29 ZHENG Ivy D V V V D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
30 CHUSID Mikayla V D D V V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
31 CHENG Evelyn V D D V V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
32 LUNG Katerina D D V V D V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
33 EYER Hailey M. V V V V V V D 3.0 6 +3.0
34 OH Erin H. V D V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
35 LIU Jaelyn A. V D V V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
36 FREEDMAN Miranda W. V V V D V D D 3.1 4 +0.9
37 CAO Ying V D V V D V D 4.0 4 -
38 HO Brianna W. V D V V V D D 3.4 4 +0.6
39 ZHANG Yunjia D V D V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
40 XUE Alanna L. V V V V D D D 2.9 4 +1.1
41 GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa V D V V D V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
42 SERBAN Samantha M. V D V D V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
43 KOENIG Charlotte R. D V D V V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
44 KOO Rachel A. V D V D V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
45 PEVZNER Victoria V V V D V D V D 3.3 4 +0.7
46 APELIAN Katherine D V D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
47 CHEN Jia P. V D D V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
48 FEDELI Caterina S. D D V V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
49 SOOD Ishani S. D D V V V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
50 KNIGHT Skylar V V V D D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
51 OUYANG Bridgette Z. V D V V D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
52 CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. V V V D D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
53 ORVANANOS Anice V V V D D V D 1.1 3 +1.9
54 KIM Katherine D V V D V D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
55 TAN Kaitlyn N. V V V D D D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
56 KOROL Neta V D D V D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
57 ZHENG Vivian V D V D D V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
58 LI Phoebe J. D D D V V V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
58 CHO Rebecca H. V V V D D D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
60 BREKER Anika D D D V V V D 2.8 2 -0.8
61 PARK Rowan M. D V D V D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
61 FANG Sabrina D V V D D V D 3.8 2 -1.8
63 SENIC Adeline D V D V D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
64 HUNG Juliana K. D D V V D D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
65 JO Mia C. V V V D D D 2.5 3 +0.5
65 CASTANEDA Erika L. V V D D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
67 LI Rachel Y. D V V D V D 1.9 3 +1.1
68 GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. V V D V D D 2.5 3 +0.5
69 CHEN Allison V. V D V D V D 2.1 3 +0.9
70 ADLER Polly Z. V D D V D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
71 QIAN Crystal V V D D V D D 4.0 3 -1.0
72 CRUM Quinn T. V D D V D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
73 HE Elizabeth W. V V D D V D D 4.0 3 -1.0
74 LEE Allison (Allie) D D V V D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
75 CHO Cameron S. D V D V V D D 2.6 3 +0.4
76 SHEN Lydia D V D D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
77 LEE Lavender V D V D V D D 1.6 3 +1.4
78 ZHANG Alina C. D V D D D V D 3.2 2 -1.2
79 JING Alexandra D V D V D D D 3.8 2 -1.8
80 MI Aileen D D V D V D D 1.5 2 +0.5
81 MILLER Naomi E. D D V D D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
82 LUO Sandra J. D D D D V V D 1.5 2 +0.5
83 SHENG Chuxi D D V D V D D 0.6 2 +1.4
84 CHEN Jessie S. D V D V D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
85 KONG Olivia V D D D D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
86 CHO Gracie L. D D V D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
87 KOKES Gabrielle V V D D D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
88 TALAVERA Daena D V D V D D 3.4 2 -1.4
89 PAHLAVI Dahlia V D D V D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
90 ACHILOVA Feyza D D V D V D D 2.0 2 -
91 YU Lauren C. V V D D D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
92 JØRGENSEN Laeticia Laura Wargniez D V D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
93 JANG Kimberley D D V D D 2.1 1 -1.1
94 CHEN Chloe I. D V D D D 0.6 1 +0.4
95 LUKINS Tianji D D D V D 2.5 1 -1.5
96 PENG Amber L. D D V D D 1.2 1 -0.2
97 SHITAMOTO Audrey F. V D D D D 1.0 1 -
98 DEBACK Greta I. D D D D V 1.8 1 -0.8
99 KHOO Lauren A. D D D V D D 2.2 1 -1.2
100 GLASSON Sophia D V D D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
101 DE LA CRUZ Eden V D D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
102 SARTORI Taylor M. D D V D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
103 WU Kyra D D D D V D 1.4 1 -0.4
104 ZHAO Sophie L. D D D D D V 2.6 1 -1.6
105 HORSLEY Asherah V D D D D D 3.5 1 -2.5
105 LI Shuang D V D D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
107 LOCKE Savannah D D D D D V 2.1 1 -1.1
108 SEMEL Liana M. V D D D D D 3.1 1 -2.1
109 SUN Ruoxi D D D D V D 1.6 1 -0.6
110 SEO IRENE Y. D D V D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
111 NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" D D V D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
112 LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
113 WU Julianna Y. D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
113 O'NEIL Neve D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
115 SEAL Julie T. D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
115 RANDOLPH Piper D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
117 ZHAO Aileen Y. D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
118 WALKER Mayah J. D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
119 DAVIA Daniella V. D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
120 BOLES Sophia D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.