Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PARK Faith K. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 26% |
| 2 | NIXON Catherine (Kasia) D. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
| 3 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 3 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
| 5 | KETKAR Ketki | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 6 | HURLEY Courtney L. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% |
| 7 | JOYCE Michaela | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% |
| 8 | HURLEY Kelley A. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 50% |
| 9 | PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 10 | HU Grace | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 11 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 12 | DING Jiahe (Heidi) | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 13 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 35% | 15% |
| 14 | FORNARIS Susana | - | - | 1% | 5% | 26% | 50% | 19% |
| 15 | TOBY Natalia R. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% |
| 16 | WU Amelia | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 17 | BASSA Francesca A. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 58% |
| 18 | LIN Jessica Y. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 19 | LIU Charlene (Kai) | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 20 | NING Emma | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 21 | LONADIER Keira | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 22 | KORFONTA Jolie | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 24 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 25 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 26 | VERMEULE Emily | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 55% | |
| 27 | JAKEL Sophia N. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 38% | 30% | 5% |
| 28 | GU Sarah | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
| 29 | GRADY Miriam A. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 40% | 28% |
| 30 | WATRALL Christina | - | - | 4% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
| 31 | LEE Michelle J. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 32 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | GANDHI Sedna S. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 34 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 21% |
| 35 | VERRET Alexanne | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
| 36 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 5% |
| 37 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 37 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 39 | RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 5% |
| 39 | OXENREIDER Tierna A. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 41 | CEBULA Anne | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 42 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 43 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 44 | NIXON Caroline (Karolina) L. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 41% | 15% |
| 45 | MEHROTRA Anya | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% | |
| 46 | LUO Ashley | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 47 | WU Fan | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 48 | MCLANE Lauren | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 49 | LIN Waiyuk | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 50 | KIM Zoe L. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 51 | LU Junyao | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 52 | CHIN Isabella | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 53 | BEI Karen | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 54 | YAO Melinda | 7% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 55 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | - | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 56 | MAO Amy | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 57 | GAO Judy | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | LEE Sumin | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 59 | CHEN Lefu | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 60 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 61 | WANG Elizabeth | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 62 | SWEET Ryleigh E. | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 63 | WITTE Vera | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 64 | XIAO Ruien | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 65 | WANG Karen | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 66 | CHU Audrey | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 67 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 3% |
| 68 | YANG Alisa | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 69 | TYLER Syd | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 70 | FALLON Kyle R. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
| 71 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 72 | XUAN Nicole J. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 73 | LI Alisha | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 75 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 76 | LEUNG Natalie | 1% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 77 | LAN Alice S. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 78 | CALDERA Lexi I. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 79 | CHEN Zhengnan(Janet) | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
| 80 | WEBER Nora | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 81 | FENG ge | 16% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 82 | COBERT Helen G. | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 83 | WELLS Tessa (Tesla) M. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 84 | REID Sobia | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 85 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 86 | SHU Youshan | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 87 | LIN Katie Y. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 88 | YOU Emily | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 89 | MUELLER Emma M. | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 90 | WANG Nora | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 90 | LIU Christina A. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 92 | YIN Julia | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 93 | KALE Anika A. | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 93 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 95 | SWENSON Nikita G. | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 96 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 97 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 97 | LU Shiqi | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 99 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 100 | LURYE Sarah | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 101 | FILIPPOV Nika D. | 5% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 101 | ISERT Sarah | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 103 | SMITH Grace L. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 104 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 105 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 106 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 107 | PADHYE Tanishka | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 108 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 109 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 110 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 111 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 112 | ASSADOURIAN Nouneh | 17% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 113 | WEISS Talia L. | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 113 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 115 | HAFEEZ Hania | 11% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 116 | REID Anousheh | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 117 | BOTNER Olivia | 28% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 118 | CHA Eugenie | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 119 | SHEN Stephanie | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 120 | BUSH Emma | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 121 | PEHLIVANI Zara | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 122 | KETKAR Mallika | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 123 | LEUNG Wan Kiu Hayley | 15% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 124 | YU Nicole J. | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 125 | LIN Ashley | 49% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.