The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

USA Fencing National Championships & July Challenge

Div I-A Women's Foil

Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 2:00 PM

Minneapolis, MN, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 SOOD Ishani S. - - 3% 13% 32% 38% 15%
2 KIM Katherine - - 1% 6% 24% 41% 28%
3 DE LA CRUZ Eden - 1% 8% 24% 35% 25% 7%
3 LIU Jaelyn A. - - 1% 6% 22% 42% 30%
5 BIASCO Anna - - 1% 11% 38% 49%
6 MILLER Naomi E. - - 3% 14% 33% 36% 13%
7 GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa - 5% 20% 38% 29% 8%
8 LI Rachel Y. - 4% 16% 34% 34% 13%
9 CASTANEDA Erika L. - - 3% 13% 32% 37% 15%
10 KOROL Neta - - 4% 15% 33% 34% 14%
11 KNIGHT Skylar - 1% 7% 26% 42% 24%
12 YU Lauren C. - 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 4%
13 CHO Rebecca H. - 4% 18% 34% 30% 12% 2%
14 CHO Cameron S. - 5% 19% 36% 30% 9%
15 LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) - 1% 8% 23% 35% 26% 7%
16 ZHAO Aileen Y. 2% 16% 40% 32% 9% 1%
17 KONG Olivia 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4%
18 SHAW Kayla M. - - 2% 11% 31% 39% 17%
19 RANDOLPH Piper - 4% 18% 35% 31% 11% 1%
20 JANG Kimberley - 5% 21% 38% 28% 7%
21 KHOO Lauren A. - 2% 14% 38% 38% 9%
22 NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" - 4% 19% 37% 32% 7%
23 RENTON Samantha - 7% 28% 41% 20% 3%
24 TAKAMIZAWA Yukari - - 1% 9% 27% 40% 22%
25 FERNANDES Thea 2% 11% 27% 32% 20% 6% 1%
26 SUN Emily 19% 38% 30% 11% 2% - -
27 MEI Sarah 2% 13% 30% 32% 18% 5% 1%
28 DUAN Konnie 1% 11% 30% 34% 19% 5% -
29 SUN Ruoxi - 2% 10% 26% 35% 23% 5%
30 DAVIS Bonnie Z. - 3% 15% 34% 33% 14% 2%
31 SHIH Diane - 5% 19% 33% 28% 12% 2%
32 CHO Gracie L. 2% 13% 34% 34% 15% 2%
33 BREKER Anika - - - 4% 21% 44% 30%
34 DAVIA Daniella V. - - 2% 11% 31% 39% 18%
35 ORVANANOS Anice - 4% 15% 30% 31% 16% 3%
36 GRIFFIN Emma G. - - 1% 9% 37% 53%
37 SEAL Julie T. 1% 6% 22% 36% 27% 8%
38 LAMBERT Mahala 1% 7% 23% 35% 25% 8% 1%
39 BOLES Sophia 3% 14% 29% 31% 18% 5% 1%
40 LOCKE Savannah - 1% 4% 16% 33% 33% 13%
41 CASTANEDA Keira 19% 38% 30% 11% 2% - -
42 PAHLAVI Dahlia - 3% 13% 28% 33% 19% 4%
43 XUE Alanna L. - - 1% 8% 24% 40% 27%
44 LEE Lavender - 4% 17% 32% 30% 14% 2%
45 STRUGAR Steliana 8% 28% 36% 21% 6% 1% -
46 KOROL Dana 7% 26% 37% 23% 6% 1%
47 BATRA Chaahat 1% 10% 28% 35% 20% 5%
48 ACHILOVA Feyza 1% 9% 27% 36% 22% 5%
49 MASSICK Laine - 1% 9% 28% 40% 21%
50 FERRETTI Anna Rebecca 4% 21% 37% 28% 9% 1%
51 QIAN Zhiyan 6% 37% 38% 16% 3% - -
52 TOLBERT Zoe 1% 9% 26% 33% 22% 7% 1%
53 WU Julianna Y. - 3% 17% 35% 31% 12% 2%
54 PENG Amber L. 1% 7% 24% 36% 24% 7% 1%
55 FUNG Emma 5% 22% 35% 26% 10% 2% -
56 LI Sophia M. 3% 15% 30% 30% 16% 4% -
57 LEE Ariana - 7% 27% 37% 22% 6% 1%
58 ZHENG Julie 13% 35% 34% 15% 3% -
59 TALWALKAR Apoorva 6% 26% 37% 24% 6% -
60 COSTELLO Angeline S. 1% 13% 32% 33% 16% 4% -
61 ASCHETTINO Aurora 5% 32% 39% 19% 4% - -
62 XIANG Emma 1% 10% 27% 34% 21% 7% 1%
63 SHENG Chuxi 3% 19% 38% 29% 10% 1% -
64 CHEW Alexis T. 1% 12% 31% 34% 17% 4% -
65 MORADI Raiyan N. 22% 40% 28% 9% 1% -
66 ZHANG Selena 48% 40% 11% 1% - -
67 COKER Bettina M. 6% 22% 35% 26% 10% 2% -
68 DU Hannah 1% 9% 26% 34% 22% 7% 1%
69 SHITAMOTO Audrey F. 1% 8% 24% 35% 24% 7% 1%
70 CHEN Chloe I. 2% 11% 28% 33% 19% 5% 1%
71 WEBB Ella 16% 37% 32% 13% 3% -
72 YIN Helen 20% 43% 28% 8% 1% -
73 HSIUNG Samantha 14% 44% 32% 9% 1% -
74 COOPER Piper W. 27% 43% 24% 6% 1% -
75 HAN Crystal 8% 26% 34% 22% 8% 1% -
76 HSIEH Rebecca 12% 34% 33% 16% 4% - -
77 LIU Siyuan 2% 13% 29% 31% 18% 5% 1%
78 RUSSELL Judith F. 14% 35% 32% 15% 3% - -
79 SUN Chien-Yu 12% 33% 34% 17% 4% -
80 PATTERSON Natalia 44% 39% 14% 3% - - -
81 DING Abigail 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1%
82 POWERS Meredith R. 6% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
83 DRAGNE Alexis D. 11% 33% 36% 17% 3% -
84 HSIEH Sabrina 70% 26% 3% - - - -
85 RECKLING Kathleen A. 29% 41% 23% 6% 1% - -
85 PARK Leah 63% 31% 6% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.