The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

USA Fencing National Championships & July Challenge

Cadet Women's Saber

Wednesday, July 6, 2022 at 1:00 PM

Minneapolis, MN, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 FREEDMAN Janna N. V V V D V V V V V V V V V 5.7 5 -0.7
2 MIKA Veronica V V V V D V V V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
3 SHOMAN Jenna V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.7 6 +0.3
3 ERIKSON Kira R. V V D V V V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
5 BEVACQUA Aria F. V V V V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
6 KER Grace V V D V V V V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
7 DUCKETT Madison D D V V V V V V V V D 5.2 4 -1.2
8 MULAGARI Sadhika V D V D V V V V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
9 HILD Nisha V V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
10 ANDRES Charmaine G. V V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
11 KIM Marley I. V V V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
12 GHAYALOD Reya V V D V V V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
13 BARNOVITZ Maya V V V V D V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
14 BALAKUMARAN Maya V D V V V V V V D 4.0 4 -
15 CHIN Sophia J. V V D V V V V V D 4.0 4 -
16 TONG Jessie V V D D D V V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
17 ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
18 ALCEBAR Kayla V V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
19 LIU Sophie V V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
20 HWANG Gabriela M. V V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
21 WIGGERS Susan Q. V V V V D V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
22 FANG Victoria W. V V V V V D V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
23 WEI Vivian W. D V V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
24 NATH Trisha V V V V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
25 KRASTEV Minna V V D V V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
26 SINHA Anika V V V D V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
27 YUAN Greta D V V D V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
28 JOHNSON Lydia V D V D V V V V D 4.0 4 -
29 YANG Angelina LeLe V V D D V V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
30 WU Helen D V V V V D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
31 XIAO julie D V V V V D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
32 SOURIMTO Valeria D D V V V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
33 VADASZ Ibla P. V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
34 HU Michelle V V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
35 LIU Sydney V V V V V D V D 3.3 5 +1.7
36 ANTHONY Alexia B. V V V D V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
37 TABANGAY Heartlyn V V V V D V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
38 SHI Julia V V D V V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
39 LI Amanda C. V V V D V V V D 5.5 5 -0.5
40 FEIG Sela V V V V D V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
41 KHAN Alissa V D V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
42 SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. D V V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
43 LIM Jaslene V V V V D V D 2.5 4 +1.5
44 CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. V V D V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
45 LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA D V V V V D V D 3.6 4 +0.4
46 YANG Lea D V V D V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
47 LEE Sophia V V D D V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
48 LIGH Erenei J. D V V V V D V D 4.1 4 -0.1
49 FERREIRA Alejandra E. V D V D V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
50 FESTA Carina V D V D V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
51 SHEARER Natalie E. D V V V D V D 4.1 3 -1.1
52 LU Elaine V V D D V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
53 JEONG Katie V V V D D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
54 LEE Hannah V D V D V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
55 JIANG Mu Jia (Michelle) V D V D V V D 0.9 3 +2.1
56 ZHANG XUANYI V D D V D V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
57 JOHNSON Dagny L. D V V D D V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
58 HAMBAZAZA Liisa D V D D V V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
59 NATHANSON Sammy E. D D V V D V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
60 LUKER Sophia D D V D V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
61 TAN Adelyn V V V D D D V D 1.4 3 +1.6
62 TSE Angelina D D V V D V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
63 ZHANG Victoria V D V D D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
64 SHINCHUK Ellisha D V D V D D V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
65 CHEN Ashley V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
66 MANSPERGER Leena V D V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
67 HUNG Anna D V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
68 ZHANG Chenfei V D V V D V D 2.4 4 +1.6
69 YANG Ashley M. D V V V D V D 5.1 4 -1.1
70 SHI Cathleen V D V V V D D 4.5 4 -0.5
71 YOUNG Charlotte G. V V D V V D D 2.7 4 +1.3
72 CHIANG Melissa V V D V V D D 2.0 4 +2.0
73 GAUTAM Sahana V D D V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
74 GRAFF Sophie D V V V D V D 4.1 4 -0.1
75 WEI JoyAnn V V D V V D D 2.6 4 +1.4
76 WANG yining V V D V D D 2.9 3 +0.1
77 PAUL Lila D V V V D D 4.1 3 -1.1
78 SO Catelyn V V D D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
79 YOUNG Audrey V V V D D D 2.2 3 +0.8
80 HENRY Soraya S. V D V V D D 2.2 3 +0.8
81 ZHANG Sophie D V D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
82 EVANS Madelynn D V V V D D 1.8 3 +1.2
83 TSUI Natalie V D V D D V D 4.1 3 -1.1
84 COLBY Mercer D V D V V D D 2.0 3 +1.0
85 DAI Olivia V D D V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
86 BAWA Anahat D V V V D D D 1.9 3 +1.1
86 CHIARELLI Valentina V V V D D D D 3.3 3 -0.3
88 YAM Danika D V V D D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
89 MEDVINSKY Alexandra D V V D V D D 2.7 3 +0.3
90 CHANG Audrey V V D V D D D 3.2 3 -0.2
91 OBRADOVIC Ana D D V D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
92 MCKEE Brynnley V V V D D D D 3.7 3 -0.7
92 DONG Angel V D D V D V D 3.0 3 -
94 FAN Grace D D V D V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
95 SOWERS Lia D V V V D D D 1.8 3 +1.2
96 LIN Nicole V D D V V D D 2.1 3 +0.9
97 ATTIA Jasmine D V D V D V D 1.0 3 +2.0
98 FLATT Sophia V D D D V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
99 ALTIRS Kate V D D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
100 NGUYEN Siena D V D D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
101 LIU Yifei D V D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
102 CHEN Kevy D V D V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
103 DUDNICK Morgan V D D V D D 1.2 2 +0.8
104 MUND Ruth D V V D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
105 SCOTT Eve D V V D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
106 REN Xinling D V D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
107 TUNG Renee D D D V V D 1.4 2 +0.6
108 MARYASH Samantha D V D D V D D 3.3 2 -1.3
109 FANG sophie D D D V V D D 2.3 2 -0.3
110 CHAN Jolene D D V D D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
111 KANTIPUDI Shrika V D V D D D D 3.1 2 -1.1
112 ZHENG Valentina D D D V D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
113 LI Victoria V V D D D D D 2.0 2 -
114 HUAI Delilah D D V D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
115 GUVEN Coco D D V D V D 2.0 2 -
115 DENG Brooke V D D V D D D 3.2 2 -1.2
117 ZOLLER Noelle D D V D V D D 2.0 2 -
118 CHAVAN Arya V D D D V D D 1.4 2 +0.6
119 HUANG Rachael D D V V D D D 2.8 2 -0.8
120 NAYAK Esha D D D V D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
120 HITOMI Nadya D D V D D V V D 2.6 2 -0.6
122 PANIGRAHI Kingsley D D D D V V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
123 BOYNTON Ainsley D V D D V D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
124 GRULICH Rayaana D V D D V D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
125 DHAR Layla D D D V D V D 1.6 1 -0.6
126 JUNG Irene V D D D D V D 4.0 1 -3.0
127 ELNATAN Mica A. D D D V D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
127 BUHAY Kirsten M. D D D V D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
129 STONE Coral V D D D V D D 1.6 2 +0.4
129 GOLOVITSER Maya D V V D D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
131 MONTORIO Lily M. D V D V D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
132 PYO Penelope E. V D D D D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
133 MANN Sophia J. D D D D V D 2.3 1 -1.3
134 HOLMES Sabrina D D D D V D 0.8 1 +0.2
135 LEUNG Ashlyn K. D D V D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
136 BARRIE Sadie Q. D D D V D D 1.6 1 -0.6
136 CHO Michelle V D D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
138 KIM Elyssa D D V D D 0.4 1 +0.6
139 LEE Lauren D D D D D V 2.5 1 -1.5
140 BOLTON Eleksi M. D V D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
141 YEN Natalie D D D D V D 2.5 1 -1.5
142 RAMIREZ Mirka A. D D V D D D 2.7 1 -1.7
143 IYER Arushi D V D D D D 0.6 1 +0.4
144 GOMERMAN Sophia D D D D D V 2.5 1 -1.5
145 XU Emily T. V D D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
146 WUNNAVA Elina V D D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
146 LAGOON Miriam D D D V D D 1.6 1 -0.6
148 CHOU Amy R. D V D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
149 CAO Sophie D D V D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
150 SAWANT Asmi D D D V D D 0.7 1 +0.3
151 YAO Rainie D D D D V D 1.0 1 -
152 YAN Lena V D D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
153 JEFFORDS Sophia D D V D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
154 GOSAVI Aabolee D D D D V D 0.8 1 +0.2
155 DANTULURI Shivani D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
156 SHEN Jamie D D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
157 CARTER Keely D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
158 DIECK Miranda P. D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
159 MERCHANT Aishwarya D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
160 LIN Lauren D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
160 KELLY Ella D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3
162 REGANTI Sitara D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
163 ZHANG Emily D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
163 DANTULURI Shalini D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
163 CHOW Caitlyn D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
166 BRAMMER-GONZALES Xiomara D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.