The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

DCFC Champagne Challenge #6

Senior Mixed Épée

Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 10:00 AM

DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Birth Year

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

#	Name	Number of victories
#	Name	0	1	2	3	4	5	6
1	NORTH Gary S.	-	-	-	2%	14%	41%	43%
2	TABLEMAN Doug S.	-	-	-	1%	15%	50%	34%
3	DUNCAN Corwin	-	-	-	2%	25%	74%
3	SIVAKUMAR Ajit	-	-	-	1%	9%	36%	53%
5	HRAPSKY Ryan J.	-	-	-	1%	13%	48%	38%
6	HARDY Tristan L.	-	-	-	6%	33%	55%	6%
7	PARK Faith K.	-	-	1%	8%	28%	41%	21%
8	PARK Ian C.	-	-	3%	26%	58%	13%
9	SU Caleb	-	1%	5%	23%	43%	24%	3%
10	SUICO Zachary Emanuel O.	-	-	3%	18%	41%	31%	7%
11	CHAWLA Armaan	-	1%	8%	31%	43%	17%
12	CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E.	-	5%	24%	41%	25%	5%
13	WOZNIAK Ignacy	-	-	3%	19%	44%	34%
14	HILBERT Gabriel E.	-	5%	33%	48%	13%	1%
15	KWOUN Miles S.	4%	24%	40%	25%	6%	1%	-
16	CAO Albert	-	-	3%	14%	33%	35%	15%
17	WOLFE Alex	-	1%	8%	24%	36%	25%	6%
18	CHAMBLISS Logan C.	-	2%	13%	32%	35%	16%	2%
19	AYMETT Robert (Skip) S.	-	1%	8%	25%	36%	24%	6%
20	DOAN Joseph M.	-	-	3%	18%	39%	32%	7%
21	WANG Trontour	15%	43%	32%	9%	1%	-
22	ZHANG Richard	18%	42%	31%	8%	1%	-	-
23	ZHANG Andy	5%	25%	38%	24%	7%	1%	-
24	COLLEY Joshua	1%	8%	25%	36%	23%	7%	1%
25	LIN Harrison	8%	30%	39%	20%	3%	-	-
26	WOZNIAK Fryderyk	-	5%	21%	36%	28%	9%	1%
27	SINGH Aryaman	-	7%	27%	37%	22%	5%	-
28	HUGHES Michael D.	-	5%	27%	43%	20%	4%	-
29	USDIN Anton	-	1%	8%	26%	36%	23%	6%
30	DUAN Eric	-	1%	10%	30%	37%	19%	2%
31	TAMULONIS Fen C.	-	1%	9%	36%	38%	14%	2%
32	ILYAS Zakariya	4%	22%	42%	26%	6%	-
33	SELLAR Ian	11%	34%	35%	16%	3%	-	-
34	JORDAN Anton	1%	15%	48%	31%	5%	-
35	CAO Brad	1%	11%	34%	36%	15%	2%	-
36	SO Lorenzo	5%	33%	39%	18%	4%	-	-
37	PALAMARCHUK Matthew	39%	48%	12%	1%	-	-
38	SINFUEGO Adrian	42%	43%	14%	2%	-	-	-
39	MILLER Kurt	19%	42%	30%	8%	1%	-	-
40	PILIPOWSKYJ Luke	28%	43%	23%	6%	1%	-	-
41	SOLDATOV Faddey	6%	29%	40%	20%	4%	-	-
42	WILLIAMS Rhys	1%	11%	32%	38%	17%	1%	-
43	BRUNDAGE Nevan	40%	43%	15%	2%	-	-
44	ARMSTRONG Gary	19%	47%	27%	6%	1%	-	-
45	LE BORGNE Matthieu	36%	50%	13%	1%	-	-
46	SMITH Auynha	64%	30%	5%	-	-	-	-
47	SIMS Martin L.	48%	39%	12%	1%	-	-	-

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

Each cell in a fencer's row corresponds to a specific number of victories, starting from the left with no victories and increasing to the right, indicating victories in all bouts.
The shading of each cell represents the probability of that particular victory outcome for the fencer. Darker shades indicate higher probabilities, suggesting that the outcome is more likely based on past performances. On the other hand, lighter shades point towards less probable outcomes.
The boxed number in a cell represents the actual number of victories the fencer achieved in the pool, making it easy to compare predicted probabilities with actual outcomes at a glance.
By examining the gradient from lighter to darker cells, you can get an intuitive sense of where a fencer's victories are more or less expected based on their historical performance.

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.

Want to keep up with all things fencingtracker? Join our Discord community here.