| Rank | Name | Strength |
Conservative Estimate* Cons. Est.* |
180-day Trend |
Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mehan, Nicholas | 2936 | 2666 | 137 | B24 |
| 2 | Kang, Evan | 2875 | 2617 | 84 | B24 |
| 3 | KIM, ELIJAH | 2840 | 2583 | 124 | B24 |
| 4 | Joo, Jeein | 2838 | 2579 | 31 | B24 |
| 5 | Anthony, Devyn | 2821 | 2567 | 5 | B24 |
| 6 | Vaid, Luke | 2768 | 2514 | 184 | A24 |
| 7 | Kim, Ethan | 2756 | 2500 | 103 | B23 |
| 8 | Lin, Maxim | 2709 | 2454 | 89 | B24 |
| 9 | Ermakov, Semeon | 2714 | 2448 | 132 | B24 |
| 10 | chon, Collin | 2695 | 2439 | 40 | B24 |
| 11 | Patel, Rayn | 2657 | 2396 | 6 | B24 |
| 12 | Munguia, Nathan | 2643 | 2390 | 11 | B24 |
| 13 | Zhao, Lucas | 2640 | 2387 | 147 | B24 |
| 14 | Pastore Liu, Vince | 2627 | 2370 | 102 | A24 |
| 15 | Wang, Daniel | 2604 | 2354 | 107 | A24 |
| 16 | Chung, Connor | 2601 | 2351 | 73 | B24 |
| 17 | Skarbonkiewicz, Maksymilian | 2590 | 2323 | 64 | B23 |
| 18 | Kim, Kendrick | 2579 | 2316 | 178 | B24 |
| 19 | Liu, Kevin | 2572 | 2315 | 46 | C23 |
| 20 | Wang, Zhuoyi | 2568 | 2312 | 33 | B24 |
| 21 | WANG, ANDREW CHANG | 2693 | 2304 | 432 | C24 |
| 22 | Bonetti, Brayden | 2543 | 2289 | 36 | D23 |
| 23 | So, Preston | 2537 | 2280 | 200 | C24 |
| 24 | Wang, Justin | 2537 | 2278 | 9 | C23 |
| 25 | Gonzalez, Jake | 2514 | 2241 | 178 | C24 |
| 26 | Bell, Alfred (Tripp) | 2424 | 2159 | 30 | C23 |
| 27 | Ngo, Maximus | 2422 | 2159 | 121 | C24 |
| 28 | Nguyen, Anthony | 2369 | 2108 | 2 | C23 |
| 29 | Alave, Kyle | 2350 | 2092 | 2 | E24 |
| 30 | Cao, Oliver | 2374 | 2090 | 195 | E24 |
| 31 | Wang, Yiyu Will | 2605 | 2090 | 51 | D24 |
| 32 | gong, zihao | 2366 | 2080 | 137 | U |
| 33 | Yap, Kah Kai (Cayden) | 2314 | 2054 | 79 | C23 |
| 34 | Wang, Max | 2347 | 2050 | 330 | C24 |
| 35 | Meyerson, Jacob | 2315 | 2045 | 191 | C24 |
| 36 | Holz, Lucas | 2294 | 2041 | 86 | D24 |
| 37 | Mattoo, Deven | 2309 | 2021 | 349 | C23 |
| 38 | Lee, Andrew | 2269 | 2011 | 30 | D24 |
| 39 | Hua, Michael | 2314 | 2010 | 78 | C24 |
* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.