The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

Junior Olympic Championships

Cadet Women's Foil

Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 ZHENG Ivy - - - - 4% 30% 66%
2 KONG Chin-Yi - - - 1% 8% 37% 54%
3 CAO Arianna L. - - - - 6% 35% 59%
3 LUNG Katerina - - - - 2% 24% 74%
5 JING Emily - - - - 3% 27% 70%
6 CHO Cameron S. - 1% 13% 42% 35% 8%
7 OH Erin H. - - - 3% 19% 45% 32%
8 PEVZNER Victoria - - 2% 16% 44% 38%
9 SOOD Ishani S. - - - 4% 24% 45% 26%
10 GRIFFIN Emma G. - - - 1% 9% 38% 53%
11 LIU Joy Zhaoyi - - 1% 8% 30% 46% 15%
12 SENIC Adeline - - - 2% 13% 41% 44%
13 WANG Ellen - - - 2% 13% 40% 45%
14 ZHANG Alina C. - - - 3% 19% 45% 33%
15 GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. - - - 3% 20% 46% 32%
16 YU Lauren C. - - 7% 28% 40% 21% 3%
17 CASTANEDA Erika L. - - - 2% 14% 43% 42%
18 ZHAO Sophie L. - - 2% 11% 33% 40% 15%
18 CHUSID Mikayla - - - - 6% 34% 59%
20 DE LA CRUZ Eden - 1% 5% 21% 39% 29% 6%
21 OUYANG Bridgette Z. - - - 4% 27% 48% 20%
22 LIU Jaelyn A. - - - 3% 19% 47% 31%
23 SHEN Sophia H. - - - 1% 8% 38% 53%
24 KOENIG Charlotte R. - - - 6% 28% 44% 22%
25 LEE Brianna J. - - - - 3% 23% 74%
26 DUAN Konnie - 1% 8% 32% 39% 18% 2%
27 LOCKE Savannah - - 1% 14% 41% 34% 8%
28 KIM Rachael - - - 1% 7% 34% 58%
29 DRAGNE Alexis D. - 2% 15% 37% 33% 11% 1%
30 XIANG Emma - 2% 14% 36% 35% 12% 1%
31 CHEN Jia P. - - - 3% 19% 47% 30%
32 HUANG NATALIE - 1% 7% 28% 41% 20% 2%
33 HO Brianna W. - - - 1% 10% 41% 48%
34 LI Rachel Y. - - 1% 6% 26% 45% 23%
35 CHEN Chloe I. - 1% 13% 40% 35% 10% 1%
36 RANDOLPH Piper - - 2% 12% 36% 40% 10%
37 DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia - - 1% 18% 44% 32% 5%
38 CHEN Allison V. - - - 9% 35% 44% 12%
39 SHEN Lydia - - 1% 5% 23% 45% 27%
40 BATRA Chaahat - - 3% 15% 39% 38% 6%
41 EYER Hailey M. - - - 1% 13% 44% 42%
42 TALWALKAR Apoorva - 1% 9% 32% 41% 16% 1%
43 NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" - - 1% 8% 28% 43% 20%
44 MEI Sarah - 1% 10% 32% 38% 16% 1%
45 HE Fenghuan - - - 6% 30% 45% 19%
46 KOROL Neta - - 1% 11% 37% 40% 12%
47 TAN Kaitlyn N. - - 3% 20% 48% 28%
48 LI Phoebe J. - - 2% 15% 46% 36%
49 KIM Katherine - - - 4% 20% 43% 32%
50 SEO IRENE Y. - 2% 16% 46% 29% 6% -
51 LUO Sandra J. - 3% 18% 38% 31% 9% 1%
52 WU Julianna Y. - - 2% 21% 44% 29% 4%
53 PAHLAVI Dahlia - - 2% 16% 43% 32% 6%
54 CHO Gracie L. - - 1% 10% 37% 42% 10%
55 PANT Anisha - - 2% 25% 45% 24% 3%
56 GOOR Viviene E. - 1% 6% 23% 39% 27% 5%
57 LIPKOVITZ Rivka 3% 18% 36% 31% 11% 1% -
58 LEE Lavender 1% 10% 36% 39% 13% 1%
59 ORVANANOS Anice 2% 15% 41% 33% 8% 1%
60 TAKAGI Hikaru G. - 1% 7% 32% 44% 16%
61 NAMGALAURI Mariam - - 7% 31% 42% 17% 2%
62 JANG Kimberley - - - 5% 23% 45% 26%
63 RASO Olivia 1% 9% 37% 40% 13% 1% -
64 GU EMILY - - 7% 39% 39% 14% 1%
65 YHIP Mikaela M. - - 1% 10% 38% 43% 8%
65 LIU Angel(Daying) - - 5% 23% 44% 25% 3%
67 LAMBERT Mahala - 1% 9% 30% 39% 18% 2%
68 CHO Rebecca H. - - 2% 23% 43% 27% 5%
69 PENG Amber L. - - 2% 18% 43% 31% 6%
70 WANDJI Anais - - 2% 13% 39% 40% 6%
71 KOROL Dana - 3% 16% 35% 33% 12% 1%
71 WELBORN Calissa 3% 20% 38% 29% 9% 1% -
73 MARKOVSKY Nina - 13% 36% 35% 14% 2% -
74 COOPER Piper W. - 4% 21% 46% 25% 4% -
75 LEE Allison 3% 22% 43% 26% 5% - -
76 ZULUETA Catherine 1% 17% 41% 32% 8% 1% -
77 STRUGAR Steliana 4% 22% 39% 26% 7% 1% -
78 SHITAMOTO Audrey F. - 2% 13% 33% 35% 15% 2%
79 HSIUNG Samantha - 7% 35% 41% 14% 2% -
80 MI Aileen - - 6% 38% 41% 14% 1%
81 SHIH Diane - - 3% 20% 45% 27% 5%
82 SARTORI Taylor M. - - 1% 9% 35% 43% 13%
83 MI Anning 1% 6% 23% 38% 26% 7% 1%
84 FERNANDES Thea - - 4% 32% 44% 19% 2%
85 KONG Olivia - - 3% 20% 46% 27% 3%
86 NISSINOFF Alexandra - 3% 16% 36% 32% 12% 1%
87 SUN Ruoxi - - 3% 18% 40% 32% 7%
88 ROY Layla - 1% 10% 30% 38% 18% 3%
88 SUN Chien-Yu - 1% 10% 30% 40% 17% 1%
88 FUNG Emma - 4% 21% 41% 27% 6% -
91 CHANG Elizabeth - 7% 31% 38% 19% 4% -
91 ASCHETTINO Aurora 1% 13% 40% 34% 10% 1% -
93 WONG Sophia M. - - 6% 24% 41% 26% 3%
94 GUERRA Sofia E. - - 5% 33% 41% 18% 2%
95 LEE Fiona E. 4% 20% 38% 28% 9% 1% -
96 CASTANEDA Keira 1% 13% 43% 32% 9% 1% -
97 YU Jaime L. 1% 9% 29% 37% 19% 4% -
98 NEWMAN Ariel 16% 42% 33% 8% 1% - -
99 BEAVER Kaitlyn 2% 20% 43% 27% 7% 1% -
100 THIRUVENGADAM Harini 7% 39% 38% 13% 2% - -
101 LEE Ariana - 2% 15% 36% 35% 11% 1%
102 KOSTELNY Alexis - - 5% 23% 40% 27% 4%
103 FUNG Vera 2% 14% 35% 35% 12% 1% -
104 KO Claire 1% 24% 57% 17% 2% - -
105 DENYSIUK Sumajja 27% 48% 21% 3% - - -
106 HWANG Alison - 3% 21% 41% 28% 6% -
107 HAN Ashley 4% 24% 39% 26% 7% 1% -
107 BEAVER Hannah 1% 14% 38% 35% 11% 1% -
109 HAN Crystal 2% 17% 38% 30% 10% 1% -
110 PENG Serena - 12% 35% 36% 15% 2% -
111 JIANG Yangying (Amanda) - 3% 18% 38% 31% 9% 1%
111 ZHANG Selena 9% 41% 39% 10% 1% - -
113 CHARALEL Jessica 1% 21% 41% 29% 8% 1% -
114 HAYES Alyssa R. 1% 10% 35% 37% 15% 2% -
114 PATTERSON Natalia 2% 25% 59% 13% 1% - -
116 KUNDU TRISHA 26% 47% 22% 4% - - -
117 OLORVIDA Isabella 27% 50% 20% 3% - - -
118 CHOI Kailyn 17% 41% 31% 10% 1% - -
119 NORTH Zoe M. 3% 30% 54% 12% 1% - -
120 JANEW Anastasia 34% 47% 18% 1% - - -
121 NIRGUDE Siddhi 68% 28% 4% - - - -
122 MORADI Raiyan N. 6% 31% 45% 17% 2% -
123 SHUM Elizabeth 15% 47% 30% 7% 1% -
124 PARK Leah 41% 44% 14% 1% - -
125 BOLES Amanda X. 5% 34% 44% 15% 2% - -
126 KETTELLE Molly 2% 17% 40% 30% 9% 1% -
127 LENZ Zoe N. 23% 43% 27% 7% 1% - -
128 DONDERIS Hannah E. 1% 7% 26% 38% 22% 5% -
129 TOBIN Brean 19% 47% 28% 5% - -
130 KAPOOR Saanvi 45% 44% 10% 1% - - -
131 SHUM Maya 2% 26% 43% 24% 5% - -
132 HOWELL Jocelyn 50% 40% 9% 1% - - -
133 PARK Jacqueline 32% 46% 19% 3% - - -
133 NICKOLOV Nora 48% 40% 11% 1% - - -
135 WILSON Liya 53% 42% 5% - - - -
136 BENNETT Abigail 6% 60% 31% 3% - - -
136 QUINN Anna 36% 43% 18% 3% - - -
138 SUN Emily 4% 28% 49% 17% 2% - -
139 SEAL Cameron I. 2% 18% 38% 31% 10% 1% -
140 ROLOFF Katarina M. 12% 40% 34% 12% 2% - -
140 CHANDLER Darcy 32% 51% 16% 2% - - -
142 WANG Celine S. 20% 41% 29% 9% 1% - -
143 CHENG Isa 64% 33% 3% - - - -
144 OWENS Elise 45% 44% 10% 1% - - -
144 ZAMELIS Madelyn 25% 45% 25% 4% - - -
144 SHAH Suhani 12% 42% 40% 6% - - -
147 LEVANT Briea 41% 42% 15% 2% - - -
148 SHANGGUAN Xiaotian 44% 46% 9% 1% - - -
149 PARK Caitlyn 10% 47% 33% 9% 1% - -
150 FERGUSON Aliya 10% 41% 37% 11% 1% - -
151 FURST Chloe 11% 36% 36% 14% 3% - -
151 CABALU Alaina 17% 44% 33% 6% - - -
153 LURIX Elise 50% 40% 10% 1% - -
154 KANG Ashley 90% 9% - - - - -
155 ARMSTRONG Olivia 30% 53% 15% 1% - - -
155 LAY Apollonia 23% 41% 27% 8% 1% - -
157 YANKOPOULOS Elise 83% 16% 1% - - - -
157 HUFFMAN Taeli 17% 54% 27% 2% - - -
157 SA Milla 20% 51% 25% 4% - - -
160 VAYNBERG Ellen 24% 49% 25% 2% - - -
161 TREADWAY Ella 67% 29% 4% - - - -
161 HOLCOMB Emily 86% 13% - - - - -
163 SAUCEDO Grecia 51% 38% 10% 1% - - -
163 BANNISTER Amelia 27% 52% 20% 2% - - -
165 LAYE Isabella 39% 47% 13% 1% - - -
166 MARTIN Adriana 62% 33% 5% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.