The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

Junior Olympic Championships

Cadet Women's Foil

Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 ZHENG Ivy V V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.6 6 +0.4
2 KONG Chin-Yi D V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.5 5 -0.5
3 CAO Arianna L. V D V V V V V V V V V D 5.5 5 -0.5
3 LUNG Katerina V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.7 6 +0.3
5 JING Emily V V V V V V V V V V D 5.7 6 +0.3
6 CHO Cameron S. V V V V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
7 OH Erin H. V V V D V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
8 PEVZNER Victoria V V V D V V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
9 SOOD Ishani S. V V V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
10 GRIFFIN Emma G. V V V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
11 LIU Joy Zhaoyi V V V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
12 SENIC Adeline D V V V V V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
13 WANG Ellen V V V D V V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
14 ZHANG Alina C. V D V V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
15 GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. V V D V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
16 YU Lauren C. D V V V V D V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
17 CASTANEDA Erika L. V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
18 ZHAO Sophie L. V V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
18 CHUSID Mikayla V V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
20 DE LA CRUZ Eden V V V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
21 OUYANG Bridgette Z. V V D V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
22 LIU Jaelyn A. V D V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
23 SHEN Sophia H. V V V V V D V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
24 KOENIG Charlotte R. D V V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
25 LEE Brianna J. D V V V V V V V D 5.7 5 -0.7
26 DUAN Konnie V D D V V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
27 LOCKE Savannah V D V D V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
28 KIM Rachael V V V D D V V V D 5.5 4 -1.5
29 DRAGNE Alexis D. D V D V V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
30 XIANG Emma V D D V V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
31 CHEN Jia P. V V D V D V V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
32 HUANG NATALIE V D D V D V V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
33 HO Brianna W. V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
34 LI Rachel Y. V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
35 CHEN Chloe I. V V V V V V V D 3.4 6 +2.6
36 RANDOLPH Piper V V V V V D V D 4.5 5 +0.5
37 DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia V D V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
38 CHEN Allison V. V V V V V D V D 4.6 5 +0.4
39 SHEN Lydia V V D V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
40 BATRA Chaahat V V V D V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
41 EYER Hailey M. V V D V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
42 TALWALKAR Apoorva V V V D V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
43 NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" V V V V V D V D 4.7 5 +0.3
44 MEI Sarah V V V V D V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
45 HE Fenghuan D V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
46 KOROL Neta V V V D V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
47 TAN Kaitlyn N. V D V V V V D 4.0 4 -
48 LI Phoebe J. V V D V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
49 KIM Katherine V V D V D V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
50 SEO IRENE Y. D V V V V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
51 LUO Sandra J. D D V V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
52 WU Julianna Y. D V V V V D V D 4.1 4 -0.1
53 PAHLAVI Dahlia V D V V V D V D 4.2 4 -0.2
54 CHO Gracie L. D V D V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
55 PANT Anisha D V V V D V V D 4.0 4 -
56 GOOR Viviene E. V D V V D V V D 4.0 4 -
57 LIPKOVITZ Rivka V D V V V D V D 2.3 4 +1.7
58 LEE Lavender V V D V D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
59 ORVANANOS Anice D V V D V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
60 TAKAGI Hikaru G. V D D V V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
61 NAMGALAURI Mariam D D V V D V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
62 JANG Kimberley D V D V D V V D 4.9 3 -1.9
63 RASO Olivia V V V D D D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
64 GU EMILY V D D D V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
65 YHIP Mikaela M. V D V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
65 LIU Angel(Daying) V V D V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
67 LAMBERT Mahala V V V D V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
68 CHO Rebecca H. V V D V V D D 4.1 4 -0.1
69 PENG Amber L. V V V V D D D 4.2 4 -0.2
70 WANDJI Anais V D V V V D D 4.3 4 -0.3
71 KOROL Dana V V V D V D D 3.4 4 +0.6
71 WELBORN Calissa V V V D D V D 2.2 4 +1.8
73 MARKOVSKY Nina V V V D D V D 2.5 4 +1.5
74 COOPER Piper W. D V V D V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
75 LEE Allison V V V D D V D 2.1 4 +1.9
76 ZULUETA Catherine V V V D V D D 2.3 4 +1.7
77 STRUGAR Steliana D D V V V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
78 SHITAMOTO Audrey F. D V V D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
79 HSIUNG Samantha V D V D V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
80 MI Aileen V D D D V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
81 SHIH Diane V D D V V D D 4.1 3 -1.1
82 SARTORI Taylor M. D D D V V V D 4.6 3 -1.6
83 MI Anning V V V D D D D 3.1 3 -0.1
84 FERNANDES Thea V V V D D D D 3.8 3 -0.8
85 KONG Olivia D D D V V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
86 NISSINOFF Alexandra V D D V D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
87 SUN Ruoxi V V D V D D D 4.2 3 -1.2
88 ROY Layla D D V D V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
88 SUN Chien-Yu D V D V D V D 3.7 3 -0.7
88 FUNG Emma D V V D V D D 3.1 3 -0.1
91 CHANG Elizabeth V V D V D D D 2.8 3 +0.2
91 ASCHETTINO Aurora D D D V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
93 WONG Sophia M. V V D V D D D 4.0 3 -1.0
94 GUERRA Sofia E. V V D V D D D 3.8 3 -0.8
95 LEE Fiona E. V D V D D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
96 CASTANEDA Keira D V V D D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
97 YU Jaime L. D V D V V D D 2.8 3 +0.2
98 NEWMAN Ariel V D V V D D D 1.4 3 +1.6
99 BEAVER Kaitlyn V D V D D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
100 THIRUVENGADAM Harini D V D D V D D 1.6 2 +0.4
101 LEE Ariana D D D D V V D 3.4 2 -1.4
102 KOSTELNY Alexis D D D V V D D 4.0 2 -2.0
103 FUNG Vera V D V D D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
104 KO Claire D D V V D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
105 DENYSIUK Sumajja V D V D D D D 1.0 2 +1.0
106 HWANG Alison D V V D D D D 3.1 2 -1.1
107 HAN Ashley D V D D D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
107 BEAVER Hannah V D V D D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
109 HAN Crystal D D V D V D D 2.3 2 -0.3
110 PENG Serena D D V V D D D 2.6 2 -0.6
111 JIANG Yangying (Amanda) V D D D D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
111 ZHANG Selena V V D D D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
113 CHARALEL Jessica V D D D V D D 2.2 2 -0.2
114 HAYES Alyssa R. D D V V D D D 2.6 2 -0.6
114 PATTERSON Natalia D D V D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
116 KUNDU TRISHA V D D D V D D 1.1 2 +0.9
117 OLORVIDA Isabella D D V D D V D 1.0 2 +1.0
118 CHOI Kailyn D D V D V D D 1.4 2 +0.6
119 NORTH Zoe M. V D D D D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
120 JANEW Anastasia D V V D D D D 0.9 2 +1.1
121 NIRGUDE Siddhi D V V D D D D 0.4 2 +1.6
122 MORADI Raiyan N. D D V D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
123 SHUM Elizabeth D D V D D V D 1.3 1 -0.3
124 PARK Leah D V D D D V D 0.8 1 +0.2
125 BOLES Amanda X. D D D D V D V D 1.7 1 -0.7
126 KETTELLE Molly D D D D D V V D 2.3 1 -1.3
127 LENZ Zoe N. D V D D D D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
128 DONDERIS Hannah E. D D D D V D V D 2.9 1 -1.9
129 TOBIN Brean D D D V D D 1.2 1 -0.2
130 KAPOOR Saanvi D V D D D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
131 SHUM Maya D D D V D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
132 HOWELL Jocelyn V D D D D D D 0.6 1 +0.4
133 PARK Jacqueline D D V D D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
133 NICKOLOV Nora D V D D D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
135 WILSON Liya D D D D D V 0.5 1 +0.5
136 BENNETT Abigail D D D D V D 1.3 1 -0.3
136 QUINN Anna V D D D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
138 SUN Emily D V D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
139 SEAL Cameron I. D D V D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
140 ROLOFF Katarina M. D D D V D D 1.5 1 -0.5
140 CHANDLER Darcy D D D D V D 0.9 1 +0.1
142 WANG Celine S. V D D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
143 CHENG Isa D D D D V D 0.4 1 +0.6
144 OWENS Elise D V D D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
144 ZAMELIS Madelyn D D V D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
144 SHAH Suhani D D D D D V 1.4 1 -0.4
147 LEVANT Briea D V D D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
148 SHANGGUAN Xiaotian D D D V D D 0.7 1 +0.3
149 PARK Caitlyn D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
150 FERGUSON Aliya D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
151 FURST Chloe D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
151 CABALU Alaina D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
153 LURIX Elise D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
154 KANG Ashley D D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1
155 ARMSTRONG Olivia D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
155 LAY Apollonia D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
157 YANKOPOULOS Elise D D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2
157 HUFFMAN Taeli D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
157 SA Milla D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
160 VAYNBERG Ellen D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
161 TREADWAY Ella D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
161 HOLCOMB Emily D D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1
163 SAUCEDO Grecia D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
163 BANNISTER Amelia D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
165 LAYE Isabella D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
166 MARTIN Adriana D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.