Nazlymov Fencing - Washington, DC, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | NASONOV Dmitrii | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 2 | TKACHEV Andrey | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
| 3 | CHENEY Christopher (Chris) M. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 3 | FERRARA Nicholas S. | V D D D V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 5 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 6 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 7 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | V V V D D V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 8 | HAMMARBERG Stowe | V V D D D V | V V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 9 | MATT Chris | V V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 10 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | V V D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 11 | MOSEYKO Alina | D V V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 12 | BELYAEVA Darya | D V V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 13 | VANKOVA Anna | D V V D V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 14 | SHATALOVA Alexandra | V V D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 15 | VERLATAIA Sofia | V D V V D D | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 16 | LI Victoria J. | D D D V V D | V V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 17 | NEWELL Alexia C. | V V V V V V | D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 18 | PARK Collin D. | V V V D V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 19 | PENTON Robert | D V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 20 | ZHOU Kevin | D D V V V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 21 | TAKEMARU Leo | V V V V D D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 22 | HANADARI-LEVY Amit | V V D V V D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 23 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | D D V V V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 24 | BRAR Sanjeet | V D D D V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 25 | DUTCHER Theodore | D V V D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 26 | ZHOU Brian | D D V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 27 | MALNATI Donald H. | D D D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 28 | LEONARD Cole | V D V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 29 | GUBAREVICH Emilia | V D D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 31 | LIU Yizhe | D D D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 32 | MAMINA Sofiia | D D V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 33 | MOLINARO Lawrence | D V V D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 34 | CHAN Audrey | D V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 35 | HSU Derek | V D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 36 | NEWMAN Jack | D D V D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 37 | ELDER John | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 38 | ELDER Rhiannon C. | D D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 39 | KOSURI Harsha | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 40 | CARNEY Gabriella | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 40 | MALYSHEVA Ekaterina | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 42 | KIM Jeremy Y. | D D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.