Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FALLON Kyle R. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 2 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 39% | 43% |
| 3 | LUO Ashley | - | - | - | 4% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
| 3 | GU Sarah | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
| 5 | XIAO Ruien | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 6 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
| 7 | XUAN Nicole J. | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% | |
| 8 | YU Nicole J. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
| 9 | LEE REGINA | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% | |
| 10 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 85% |
| 11 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% |
| 11 | RUNIONS Emersyn | - | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 13 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 14 | KIM Jayna | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | KHARCHYNA Polina | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% |
| 16 | YAO Yilin | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 17 | YIN Julia | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 18 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% |
| 18 | HAFEEZ Hania | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 20 | NGUYEN Tallulah | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 21 | ZHANG Victoria R. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
| 22 | PADHYE Tanishka | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
| 23 | LAN Alice S. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
| 24 | NGUYEN Kira | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
| 25 | FURMAN Maria | - | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 5% |
| 26 | KORFONTA Jolie | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
| 27 | SU Evelyn | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
| 28 | SHELIN Chelsea | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | REID Anousheh | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 30 | CANNING Charlotte | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 30 | ZHANG Yixuan | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 32 | GUO Luxi | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 33 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | - | - | 6% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 4% |
| 34 | SPRINGER Sierra | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
| 35 | HONG Elaine | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
| 36 | YOUNG VIVIAN | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 36 | BRUNSON Nile | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 1% |
| 39 | KUKVA Taisiya | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 40 | GORNOVSKY Abigail | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 41 | LI Zhenni (Jenny) | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 42 | LI Judy | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 43 | POTAPENKO Margarita D. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 10% |
| 44 | SONG Angela | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 45 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
| 46 | DAHER Yasmine | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 47 | BUSH emma | - | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 5% |
| 47 | BECKMAN Ana | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 49 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 50 | KUMAR Eva | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 51 | DESAI Meera P. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 44% | 26% | |
| 52 | PEHLIVANI Zara | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
| 53 | GUJJA Misha | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 54 | SUN Renee R. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 55 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 30% | ||
| 56 | CARRIER Meredith | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | ||
| 57 | QI Jarynne Valerie | - | 3% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 58 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 59 | MUN Brianna K. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 60 | LI Fei | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 61 | LI Suri | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 62 | XIONG Angelica | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 63 | LU Samantha R. | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 64 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | SWENSON Nikita G. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 66 | YAO Melinda | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 67 | KIM Zoe L. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% |
| 68 | AI Amy | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 69 | CHANG Celine A. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 70 | LIU Nicole | 1% | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | |
| 71 | ANDERSON Claire | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 72 | LEE Natasha | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
| 73 | WITTER Catherine A. | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% | ||
| 74 | REMEZA Alissa | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% |
| 75 | CHI Chelsea | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | - |
| 76 | GEVA Eliana | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 77 | FENG ge | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 78 | CALDERA Lexi I. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 79 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 80 | HESS Heidi J. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 81 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 81 | SENYUVA Su | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 81 | SHU Youshan | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 84 | CHOI Grace | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 85 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | - | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
| 86 | RICHARDSON Meredith | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 87 | LEE Olivia | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 88 | KUMAR Anusha | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 89 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% | |
| 90 | CAFASSO Natalya | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 32% | 4% | |
| 91 | WANG Ziqi (yoyo) | - | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 92 | LEEDER Elizabeth | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 93 | LIN Elaine | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
| 94 | DUONG Zoey | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 95 | NGUYEN Ella | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 95 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 97 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 98 | TANG Elaine | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 99 | WONG Alexandra R. | 11% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | ||
| 100 | HUANG Lanlan | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 101 | PULLARA Ashley | 1% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 102 | ZHU Serene M. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 102 | WANG Angelina | 1% | 10% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 104 | YANG Alisa | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 14% | |
| 105 | BEAVER Ava | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 105 | BALAKRISHNAN Trisha | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 107 | LEWIS Rachel | 13% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 108 | JAKEL Alysa C. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 109 | LIN Ashley | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 1% | |
| 110 | MENDOZA zoie | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 111 | PHUKAN Indra | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 112 | MISHIMA Audrey | 21% | 45% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 113 | SALISTRA Emilia | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 114 | KOVALCHUK Erika S. | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 115 | LIN Ariel | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 116 | DONDISCH Andrea | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 117 | LI Clara | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 118 | WANG Victoria | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 119 | YAO KATHARINE | 2% | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 120 | WANG Jessie | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 121 | ELSTON Sophia | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 122 | LEE Yedda | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 2% |
| 123 | PRESMAN Aerin | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 124 | PECK Maia A. | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | ||
| 125 | TONG Lauren | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | - | |
| 126 | CHA Eugenie | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 127 | HSIU Elizabeth | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 128 | YOU Emily | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 1% |
| 129 | KORKIN Alice | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 130 | IYER Ishana | 17% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 131 | LEE Camilla | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 132 | FERNLUND Helen | 7% | 36% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 133 | TRAN Helena | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 134 | FAN Elizabeth | 10% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 135 | CHENG Katherine | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 136 | LENDIS Gabrielle | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 137 | DAYAL Saahira | 21% | 43% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 137 | GUESNARD Maelig | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 139 | LI Azalea | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 140 | RUSSELL Alison | 1% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 141 | MARTIN Adriana | 32% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 141 | MULAGARI Swarasai | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 143 | CHUANG Ramona | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 144 | PRIHODKO Nina | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 145 | TAMBELLINI Savannah | 13% | 38% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 146 | LIANG Jingjing | 7% | 35% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 147 | SCANLAN Claire | 29% | 50% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 148 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | - | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 149 | SHIV Avni | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 150 | LIU Baihan | 5% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 151 | LAI Amanda | 41% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 152 | BROWN Riley | 16% | 39% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 153 | LEE Samantha X. | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 154 | SHARMA Sanvi | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 155 | BLANCO Ariia | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 156 | CONNOLLY Natasha | 41% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 157 | FREEMAN Kate | 36% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 158 | HOAGLAND Sally | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 159 | MEWES Katie M. | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 160 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 40% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 161 | STOMMEL-DIAZ Charly | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 162 | MOLLINIER Angel | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 163 | VICKERMAN Lilly | 13% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 164 | CHANG chaehee | 82% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 165 | OBERDERFER Viktoriia | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 166 | YIN Gabriela | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 167 | YOUSSEF Caroline | 56% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.