The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

December NAC

Cadet Women's Épée

Sunday, December 11, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 FALLON Kyle R. V V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.6 6 +0.4
2 GAJJALA Sharika R. V V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
3 LUO Ashley D V V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
3 GU Sarah V V V V D V V V V V V D 5.7 5 -0.7
5 XIAO Ruien V V V V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
6 ZIGALO Elizabeth V V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
7 XUAN Nicole J. V V V V V V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
8 YU Nicole J. V V V D V V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
9 LEE REGINA V V V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
10 KHAMIS Yasmine A. V V V V V V V V V D 5.8 6 +0.2
11 SEBASTIAN Felicity A. V V D V V V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
11 RUNIONS Emersyn V V V V D V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
13 MEHROTRA Anya V V D V V V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
14 KIM Jayna V V V V V D V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
15 KHARCHYNA Polina D V V V V D V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
16 YAO Yilin D D V D V V V V D 2.9 2 -0.9
17 YIN Julia V V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
18 NELSON-LOVE Lily B. V V D V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
18 HAFEEZ Hania V D V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
20 NGUYEN Tallulah V V V D V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
21 ZHANG Victoria R. V V V D V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
22 PADHYE Tanishka V V V V D V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
23 LAN Alice S. V V D V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
24 NGUYEN Kira D V V V V V V D 4.0 4 -
25 FURMAN Maria V V V V D D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
26 KORFONTA Jolie D V V D V V V V D 5.2 4 -1.2
27 SU Evelyn V V D D V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
28 SHELIN Chelsea D V D V V D V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
29 REID Anousheh V V V D D D V V D 4.5 3 -1.5
30 CANNING Charlotte D D V V V D V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
30 ZHANG Yixuan V D V D V D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
32 GUO Luxi D V D V D D V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
33 RANDLEMAN Teresa V V V V V D V D 4.0 5 +1.0
34 SPRINGER Sierra V V D V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
35 HONG Elaine V V V D V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
36 YOUNG VIVIAN V V V D V V V D 2.6 5 +2.4
36 BRUNSON Nile V V D V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
38 CHIRASHNYA Noya V V V D V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
39 KUKVA Taisiya V D V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
40 GORNOVSKY Abigail V D V D V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
41 LI Zhenni (Jenny) D V V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
42 LI Judy V V D V V D V D 3.3 4 +0.7
43 POTAPENKO Margarita D. V V D V D V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
44 SONG Angela V D V D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
45 TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) V V V V D D V D 4.0 4 -
46 DAHER Yasmine V D V D V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
47 BUSH emma V V D D V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
47 BECKMAN Ana D D V V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
49 CHISHOLM Phoebe C. V V D D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
50 KUMAR Eva V V V D D V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
51 DESAI Meera P. V V D V D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
52 PEHLIVANI Zara V V V D D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
53 GUJJA Misha D D V V V D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
54 SUN Renee R. D V D D V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
55 DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia D D V V V D 3.0 2 -1.0
56 CARRIER Meredith V D V D V D 1.0 2 +1.0
57 QI Jarynne Valerie D D D V V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
58 CHERNIS Zoe C. D V V V D D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
59 MUN Brianna K. V D D D V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
60 LI Fei V D D V V D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
61 LI Suri V D D D V V D 1.9 2 +0.1
62 XIONG Angelica V D D V D V D 2.0 2 -
63 LU Samantha R. D D V V D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
64 NGUYEN Ashley L. D D D V V D V V D 1.5 2 +0.5
65 SWENSON Nikita G. V V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
66 YAO Melinda V V V V V D D 4.2 5 +0.8
67 KIM Zoe L. V V V V D V D 4.7 5 +0.3
68 AI Amy V V V V D V D 3.7 5 +1.3
69 CHANG Celine A. V V D V V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
70 LIU Nicole V V V V D D 2.9 4 +1.1
71 ANDERSON Claire V V D V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
72 LEE Natasha D V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
73 WITTER Catherine A. V V V D D 2.6 3 +0.4
74 REMEZA Alissa D V D V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
75 CHI Chelsea D V D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
76 GEVA Eliana D V V V V D D 2.2 4 +1.8
77 FENG ge D D V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
78 CALDERA Lexi I. V V D D V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
79 MARTYNOVA Diana D V V V D V D 2.3 4 +1.7
80 HESS Heidi J. V D V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
81 SMUK Alexandra S. D V V V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
81 SENYUVA Su D D V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
81 SHU Youshan V V V D V D D 3.8 4 +0.2
84 CHOI Grace V V V V D D D 3.0 4 +1.0
85 SMOTRITSKY Mia V D V V D V D 4.5 4 -0.5
86 RICHARDSON Meredith D V V D V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
87 LEE Olivia V V V D V D D 3.4 4 +0.6
88 KUMAR Anusha D V D V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
89 BEZUGLAYA Varvara V V V D D D 3.7 3 -0.7
90 CAFASSO Natalya V D V D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
91 WANG Ziqi (yoyo) V V V D D D D 3.2 3 -0.2
92 LEEDER Elizabeth D V V V D D D 2.8 3 +0.2
93 LIN Elaine D V D V D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
94 DUONG Zoey D V D D V V D 1.4 3 +1.6
95 NGUYEN Ella V D V D V D D 1.3 3 +1.7
95 PINNAMANENI Drithi D D V V V D D 2.8 3 +0.2
97 KRUMHOLZ Nicole D D D V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
98 TANG Elaine D V V V D D D 1.2 3 +1.8
99 WONG Alexandra R. D V D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
100 HUANG Lanlan D D V V V D D 3.3 3 -0.3
101 PULLARA Ashley D V D V D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
102 ZHU Serene M. V V D V D D D 2.9 3 +0.1
102 WANG Angelina V D V V D D D 2.6 3 +0.4
104 YANG Alisa D D V D V D 3.5 2 -1.5
105 BEAVER Ava D D D V V D 2.2 2 -0.2
105 BALAKRISHNAN Trisha V D D D V D 0.9 2 +1.1
107 LEWIS Rachel D D V V D D 1.5 2 +0.5
108 JAKEL Alysa C. D D D V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
109 LIN Ashley D V D V D D 2.6 2 -0.6
110 MENDOZA zoie V V D D D D 1.3 2 +0.7
111 PHUKAN Indra V D V D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
112 MISHIMA Audrey V D D V D D 1.2 2 +0.8
113 SALISTRA Emilia D V V D D D 1.0 2 +1.0
114 KOVALCHUK Erika S. D D V V D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
115 LIN Ariel V D D D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
116 DONDISCH Andrea V D D D V D D 0.5 2 +1.5
117 LI Clara D D D V D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
118 WANG Victoria D V D D D V D 2.0 2 -
119 YAO KATHARINE D V D D D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
120 WANG Jessie V D V D D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
121 ELSTON Sophia V D D V D D D 3.9 2 -1.9
122 LEE Yedda D V D D V D V D 3.7 2 -1.7
123 PRESMAN Aerin D V D D D V V D 1.8 2 +0.2
124 PECK Maia A. V D D D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
125 TONG Lauren D V D D D V D 2.2 1 -1.2
126 CHA Eugenie D D D V D V D 2.6 1 -1.6
127 HSIU Elizabeth D D V D D D V D 2.9 1 -1.9
128 YOU Emily V D D D D D V D 3.6 1 -2.6
129 KORKIN Alice D D V D D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
130 IYER Ishana D D D V V D D 1.4 2 +0.6
131 LEE Camilla D V D V D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
132 FERNLUND Helen D D V D D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
133 TRAN Helena D D V D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
134 FAN Elizabeth D D D D V D 1.7 1 -0.7
135 CHENG Katherine D D V D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
136 LENDIS Gabrielle D D D D D V D 2.0 1 -1.0
137 DAYAL Saahira D D D D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
137 GUESNARD Maelig D D D V D D 0.9 1 +0.1
139 LI Azalea D V D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
140 RUSSELL Alison D D D D D V 2.6 1 -1.6
141 MARTIN Adriana D V D D D D 1.0 1 -
141 MULAGARI Swarasai D D D D V D 1.1 1 -0.1
143 CHUANG Ramona D V D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
144 PRIHODKO Nina D D V D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
145 TAMBELLINI Savannah D D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
146 LIANG Jingjing V D D D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
147 SCANLAN Claire D D D D V D 0.9 1 +0.1
148 KOZLOWSKI Maya M. V D D D D D 3.1 1 -2.1
149 SHIV Avni D D D D D V 3.2 1 -2.2
150 LIU Baihan D D D V D D 2.0 1 -1.0
151 LAI Amanda D D V D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
152 BROWN Riley D V D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
153 LEE Samantha X. D D D V D D 1.3 1 -0.3
154 SHARMA Sanvi D D D D D V 2.8 1 -1.8
155 BLANCO Ariia D D D D D V 1.0 1 -
156 CONNOLLY Natasha D V D D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
157 FREEMAN Kate D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
158 HOAGLAND Sally D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
159 MEWES Katie M. D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
160 CHIRASHNYA Mika D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
161 STOMMEL-DIAZ Charly D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
162 MOLLINIER Angel D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
163 VICKERMAN Lilly D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
164 CHANG chaehee D D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2
165 OBERDERFER Viktoriia D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
166 YIN Gabriela D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
167 YOUSSEF Caroline D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.