The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

January NAC

Veteran Women's Épée

Friday, January 6, 2023 at 8:00 AM

Louisville, KY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 FOELLMER Kristin - - - 1% 6% 31% 62%
2 ZAFFT Sharrie A. - - 2% 12% 31% 38% 17%
3 PROKOP Jeannine A. - 3% 17% 35% 32% 12% 1%
3 HOFMAN Haejung - 2% 11% 27% 34% 20% 4%
5 SHICK Klaudia - 1% 11% 30% 37% 18% 3%
6 MARCHANT Sandra M. - - - 3% 19% 44% 33%
7 BOWIE Charlotta - 1% 11% 34% 37% 15% 2%
8 SWENSON Alexandra 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
9 POLANICHKA Nicole P. - - - 2% 12% 40% 47%
10 MUELLER Polo - - 2% 13% 35% 37% 12%
11 GANSER Yuliya - - - 4% 20% 43% 32%
12 HENDRICK Heidi M. - - 2% 13% 34% 36% 13%
13 HANSEN Kira - 1% 6% 21% 36% 28% 8%
14 HABERKERN Kundry E. - - 1% 8% 28% 42% 22%
15 HUTCHINSON Valerie A. - - 2% 11% 30% 40% 18%
16 GORDET Cristina G. - - 1% 9% 26% 40% 24%
17 RUSCONI Jane - 1% 9% 32% 39% 16% 2%
18 TADLOCK Christine M. 1% 10% 29% 37% 19% 4%
19 ASHER Valerie - - 2% 13% 40% 45%
20 INAMDAR Nina S. 5% 25% 38% 25% 7% 1%
21 WOLF Lisa A. - - 3% 16% 35% 34% 10%
22 RICH Caroline B. - 2% 11% 30% 37% 18% 3%
23 MONTOYA Amy C. - - 1% 8% 30% 43% 17%
24 GLOVER Cynthia E. - 5% 20% 37% 31% 7%
24 BELAOUSSOFF Vera 3% 18% 35% 31% 11% 1%
26 LORENTSON Dawn M. - 1% 6% 23% 40% 27% 4%
27 JEANDHEUR Carole A. 6% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
28 BRISK Angelica A. - 2% 12% 32% 35% 16% 3%
29 ROWLAND May 1% 10% 26% 35% 22% 6% 1%
30 WOUNDY Melissa A. 2% 14% 33% 32% 15% 3% -
31 SCHMID Carola K. - 2% 13% 33% 38% 14%
32 BYRON Karen J. 19% 39% 30% 10% 2% -
33 TELLES Anna - - 3% 16% 37% 34% 8%
34 MORET Brighid E. - 2% 11% 30% 36% 18% 3%
35 CHRISTIAN Lyn T. 1% 11% 32% 35% 18% 4% -
36 CHOY Ida - 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 4%
37 FREY Alison 8% 30% 37% 20% 5% -
38 LEIGHTON Louise N. - 1% 8% 26% 41% 24%
39 SCHULTZ Michelle M. - - 2% 12% 32% 38% 15%
40 WIESSLER-HUGHES Linda 1% 7% 22% 34% 25% 9% 1%
41 SMITH Dorothy 20% 41% 28% 9% 1% - -
42 KUHN April 9% 30% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
43 MANDEL Helen (Jenner) 1% 19% 38% 29% 10% 2% -
44 GERRISH Joanne 3% 19% 37% 29% 10% 1% -
45 NOLLNER Jennifer R. 1% 10% 30% 37% 19% 4% -
46 LLOYD Melanie 7% 34% 37% 17% 4% - -
47 RUNYON Cynthia J. 1% 13% 35% 35% 14% 2% -
48 MCGRATH Polina S. 1% 5% 18% 32% 29% 13% 2%
49 RADICH Lori G. 8% 30% 39% 19% 4% - -
50 REAM Jann L. 2% 20% 39% 29% 10% 1% -
51 KUNJAN Christiane 9% 32% 38% 17% 4% - -
52 PIERCE Marcia M. 5% 22% 36% 26% 10% 2% -
53 BLASKO Judit 2% 15% 37% 33% 12% 2% -
54 FILIPPOV NEMETH Victoria 8% 30% 37% 20% 5% -
55 STANICA Teodora O. 29% 42% 23% 6% 1% -
56 MITCHELL Erica 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1%
57 JENSEN MJ 15% 35% 32% 14% 3% - -
58 COMES Rita - 5% 22% 37% 27% 8% 1%
59 BROWN Trish M. 18% 41% 31% 9% 1% - -
60 WILKENS Patricia A. 14% 36% 33% 14% 3% - -
61 DAVIS Shanna 20% 45% 29% 6% - - -
62 TASKER Monisha B. 18% 37% 30% 12% 3% - -
63 BRUNELLI Alessandra 63% 31% 6% - - - -
64 KOSCHEWA Jennifer 2% 14% 34% 34% 14% 2% -
65 KELLY Diane A. 5% 27% 38% 23% 6% 1% -
66 SHEFFIELD Lydia 48% 39% 11% 1% - - -
67 OSTERBAUER Nancy K. 27% 46% 23% 3% - - -
68 MYERS Debra 78% 20% 2% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.