The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

January NAC

Veteran Women's Épée

Friday, January 6, 2023 at 8:00 AM

Louisville, KY, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 FOELLMER Kristin V V D V V V V V V V V V 5.5 5 -0.5
2 ZAFFT Sharrie A. V V V V V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
3 PROKOP Jeannine A. D V V V V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
3 HOFMAN Haejung V V V V V V V V V V D 3.7 6 +2.3
5 SHICK Klaudia V V V V V V V V V D 3.7 6 +2.3
6 MARCHANT Sandra M. V V D V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
7 BOWIE Charlotta V D V D V V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
8 SWENSON Alexandra D D V D V D V V V D 2.0 2 -
9 POLANICHKA Nicole P. V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
10 MUELLER Polo V V V V V V V V D 4.4 6 +1.6
11 GANSER Yuliya V D V V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
12 HENDRICK Heidi M. V D V V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
13 HANSEN Kira V V D D V V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
14 HABERKERN Kundry E. V D V V D V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
15 HUTCHINSON Valerie A. V V D V D V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
16 GORDET Cristina G. V D D D V D V V D 4.8 2 -2.8
17 RUSCONI Jane D V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
18 TADLOCK Christine M. V D V V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
19 ASHER Valerie V D V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
20 INAMDAR Nina S. V V V D V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
21 WOLF Lisa A. V D V V D V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
22 RICH Caroline B. V V D D V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
23 MONTOYA Amy C. V V V V D D V D 4.7 4 -0.7
24 GLOVER Cynthia E. V V V D D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
24 BELAOUSSOFF Vera D V D V V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
26 LORENTSON Dawn M. V D V V D D V D 4.0 3 -1.0
27 JEANDHEUR Carole A. D D V D V V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
28 BRISK Angelica A. V V V D D D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
29 ROWLAND May D V D V V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
30 WOUNDY Melissa A. D V V D D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
31 SCHMID Carola K. D V D V D V D 3.5 2 -1.5
32 BYRON Karen J. D D V D D V D 1.4 1 -0.4
33 TELLES Anna V V V V D V D 4.3 5 +0.7
34 MORET Brighid E. V V V V D V D 3.7 5 +1.3
35 CHRISTIAN Lyn T. V V D D V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
36 CHOY Ida D V V V V D D 3.6 4 +0.4
37 FREY Alison V V D D V D 1.8 3 +1.2
38 LEIGHTON Louise N. V D D V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
39 SCHULTZ Michelle M. D V D D V V D 4.5 3 -1.5
40 WIESSLER-HUGHES Linda D V V D V D D 3.1 3 -0.1
41 SMITH Dorothy D D V V V D D 1.3 3 +1.7
42 KUHN April V V V D D D D 1.9 3 +1.1
43 MANDEL Helen (Jenner) D V V D V D D 2.3 3 +0.7
44 GERRISH Joanne D D D V D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
45 NOLLNER Jennifer R. D V D V D D D 2.8 2 -0.8
46 LLOYD Melanie D D D V D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
47 RUNYON Cynthia J. D D V V D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
48 MCGRATH Polina S. D D V D V D D 3.3 2 -1.3
49 RADICH Lori G. V D D D V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
50 REAM Jann L. V D D D V D D 2.3 2 -0.3
51 KUNJAN Christiane V D D D V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
52 PIERCE Marcia M. V V D D D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
53 BLASKO Judit V D D D V D D 2.5 2 -0.5
54 FILIPPOV NEMETH Victoria D D V D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
55 STANICA Teodora O. D V D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
56 MITCHELL Erica D D D V D D 2.0 1 -1.0
57 JENSEN MJ D D V D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
58 COMES Rita D V D D D D D 3.1 1 -2.1
59 BROWN Trish M. D D D D D V D 1.4 1 -0.4
60 WILKENS Patricia A. D D D V D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
61 DAVIS Shanna D D D V D D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
62 TASKER Monisha B. V D D D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
63 BRUNELLI Alessandra D D D D D D V D 0.4 0 -0.4
64 KOSCHEWA Jennifer D D D D D D V D 2.5 0 -2.5
65 KELLY Diane A. D D D D V D D 2.0 1 -1.0
66 SHEFFIELD Lydia D D V D D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
67 OSTERBAUER Nancy K. D D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
68 MYERS Debra D D D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.