The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 86% |
| 2 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% | |
| 3 | LEE Natasha | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 39% |
| 3 | HANSEN Kira | - | - | 8% | 38% | 54% | ||
| 5 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 74% |
| 6 | CHA Eugenie | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
| 7 | HEPLER Sarah | - | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 34% | 3% |
| 8 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% | |
| 9 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 1% | 6% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 2% | |
| 10 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 20% | |
| 11 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | 4% | 32% | 49% | 14% | ||
| 12 | OBENCHAIN Janel | - | - | - | 6% | 29% | 46% | 19% |
| 13 | MONTOYA Amy C. | - | - | 6% | 27% | 44% | 23% | |
| 14 | LI Charlotte | - | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% | |
| 14 | WILEY Erica | - | - | - | 4% | 32% | 63% | |
| 16 | HOFMAN Haejung | - | 2% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 8% | |
| 17 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
| 18 | ENRILE Erica | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 8% | - |
| 19 | DAYAL Saahira | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 20 | POON Desiree | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 21 | CHIEM Karen | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 22 | LAI Amanda | 9% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | HSIU Elizabeth | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% | |
| 24 | RICH Caroline B. | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | - |
| 25 | PRIMES Amanda M. | - | 11% | 47% | 35% | 6% | ||
| 26 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 36% | 44% | 7% |
| 27 | CHANG Celine A. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 2% | |
| 28 | DUONG Zoey | - | 12% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | |
| 29 | SCHOR Elisabeth | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 30 | MOLLINIER Angel | 14% | 42% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | XU Celina | 15% | 59% | 23% | 3% | - | ||
| 32 | KAUR Jaap | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | RYAN Minhuey | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 31% | 6% |
| 34 | HAU Olivia | 1% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
| 35 | CHUNG Penelope | 3% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 36 | LIANG Jingjing | - | 8% | 36% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 37 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | - | 9% | 38% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 38 | SALISTRA Emilia | 5% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 39 | BHATT Anisha | 3% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 40 | BLOOMER Suzanne | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 51% | 14% | |
| 41 | WELBORN Kathrina | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 41 | SRIVASTAVA Arya | 5% | 47% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | MA Katelyn | 2% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 7% | - | |
| 44 | KIM Eugenia (Eugenia Kim) | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 45 | DALEY Keira | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 46 | MYERS Cal | 71% | 27% | 2% | - | - | ||
| 47 | MULAGARI Swarasai | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | MAGYARI-KOPE Ingrid | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 49 | BANERJEE Eesha | 69% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 50 | DING Grace | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 51 | ESTRADA Ariana | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | CHEN Samantha | 76% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | PERKINS-OLLILA Emily | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 54 | COHEN Shaina | 11% | 54% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 55 | GILLIS-PADE Neallie | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 56 | BENNETT Vienne | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.