Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 2 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 3 | ANDRES Katherine A. | D D V V D | V V V V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 3 | SHOMAN Jenna | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 5 | LIN Zhiyin | V V V V V | V V D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
| 6 | BEALE Zoe M. | V D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 7 | KATZ Anat | V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 8 | ERIKSON Kira R. | D D V V D V | V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 9 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | V V V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 10 | XI Shining | V V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 11 | HURST Kennedy | D V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | VESTEL Mira B. | V V D V D V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 13 | NEIBART Fiona | V D V D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 14 | TANG Catherine H. | V V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 15 | FEARNS Zara A. | V D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 16 | SATHE Mehek S. | D V D D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 17 | SATHYANATH Kailing | V D V V V V | D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 18 | SHOMAN Miriam | V V V V D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 19 | MARSEE Samantha | V V V V D | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 20 | BUHAY Rachel T. | D D V V V V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 21 | CODY Alexandra C. | D V V V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 22 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | D D V V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 23 | SHIH Christina | D V D V V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 24 | CHEN Xinyan | V V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 25 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | V V D D V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 26 | TSAI Anna A. | D V D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 27 | LU Amy | V D V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 28 | REDDY Shreya | D V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 29 | KOLL-BRAVMANN Ryder S. | V V D D D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 30 | NOVICK Mia J. | D D V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 31 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | D D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 32 | NG Sarah W. | D D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 33 | RAHIM Alina O. | V D D V D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 34 | WHITESIDES Abigail E. | V V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 35 | KALISOVA Kristyna | D V D D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 36 | TUNG Renee | V V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 37 | KIM Sujin | V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 38 | SUN Jialing | D D D D V | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 39 | PATEL Riya | D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 40 | RANGANATHAN Ruchi | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 41 | LEI Weixuan (Demi) | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 42 | YEN Natalie | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 43 | BARNOVITZ Maya | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 44 | BELLANTONI Eva | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 45 | YERRAMILLI Kavya | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.