The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

National Championships & July Challenge (Summer Nationals)

Div I Women's Saber

Monday, July 3, 2023 at 2:00 PM

Phoenix Convention Center - Phoenix, AZ, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.7 6 +0.3
2 BURKE Nora S. V V V D V V V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
3 POSSICK Lola P. D V V V V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
3 LU Vivian Y. D D V V V V V V V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
5 CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. V V V V V V V V V D 5.8 6 +0.2
6 NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
7 GREENBAUM Atara R. V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
8 WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. V V V D D V V V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
9 KIM Zoe V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
10 SHOMAN Jenna V V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
11 ERIKSON Kira R. V V V V V D V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
12 MILLER Sky V V V D V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
13 ANDRES Katherine A. D V V V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
14 PAUL Lila V V D V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
15 OISHI Megumi V D V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
16 LIU Sophie D D V V V D V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
17 FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
18 DRAGON Rainer V V V V V V D 2.1 5 +2.9
19 HILD Nisha V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
20 LIN Audrey J. D V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
21 DELSOIN Chelsea C. D V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
22 GOUHIN Chloe V D V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
23 LINDER Kara E. D V V V V V V D 5.6 5 -0.6
24 GHAYALOD reya D V V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
25 HARRISON Imogen N. V V D V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
26 SHEALY Maggie D V V V D V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
27 TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth V V V D V D V D 5.2 4 -1.2
28 CHEN Ashley V V V D V D V D 2.1 4 +1.9
28 MELNYCHUK Yelyzaveta D V V V V D V D 4.1 4 -0.1
30 WEI Vivian W. V D V V D V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
31 BOIS Adele V V V D V D V D 3.8 4 +0.2
32 CHIN Sophia J. D V V V V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
33 PAK Kaitlyn V V D V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
34 JOHNSON Lydia V V V D V V D 2.0 5 +3.0
35 JUNG Irene V V D V D V D 2.7 4 +1.3
36 BEVACQUA Aria F. V V V D D V D 3.6 4 +0.4
37 DUCKETT Madison V D V D V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
38 SADIK HANA D V V D V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
39 GEYER Carolina M. V V D D V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
40 STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. D V V V D V D 4.6 4 -0.6
40 LU Elaine D V V D V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
42 YANG Angelina LeLe D V V V D V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
43 BLUM Leah I. V V V V D D V D 3.0 4 +1.0
44 HWANG Gabriela M. V D D V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
45 VESTEL Mira B. V D D V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
46 MIKA Veronica D D V V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
47 XIAO julie V D D V V D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
48 FREEDMAN Janna N. D V D V D V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
49 LEE Alexandra B. D V D D V V V D 4.6 3 -1.6
50 KER Grace V D V D V D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
51 CHEN Xiaohan V V D V D D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
52 SHEARER Natalie E. D V D D V V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
53 LEE Sophia D D V V V D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
53 SOURIMTO Valeria V V D D V D V D 3.0 3 -
55 SAYLES Nina R. V D D V V D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
56 HUANG MADELINE V V D D D V V D 1.1 3 +1.9
57 KAKHIANI-MECKLING Teodora D D V D V V V D 4.5 3 -1.5
58 YANG Ashley M. D D V V V D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
59 ANTHONY Alexia B. V V D D D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
60 TZOU Alexandra V D D D V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
61 SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. D V D V D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
62 SATHYANATH Kailing V D V D D D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
63 SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne D D V D V D V D 4.1 2 -2.1
64 VADASZ Ibla P. V V D D D D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
65 FOUR-GARCIA Madison V D D V D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
66 D-SALLOWS Keira V V D D D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
67 SO Catelyn V D D V V D D 2.3 3 +0.7
68 ANDRES Charmaine G. V D V V D D D 2.9 3 +0.1
69 LU Amy D D D V V V D 1.6 3 +1.4
70 GUTHIKONDA Nithya V D V D V D D 3.1 3 -0.1
71 KIM Marley I. D V V D D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
72 SHI Cathleen D V V D D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
72 CALLAHAN Chase J. V V D D V D D 3.2 3 -0.2
74 GORMAN Victoria M. D D D V V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
75 MAKLIN Sofia V D D V V D D 1.4 3 +1.6
75 LIM Jaslene V V D D D V D 2.1 3 +0.9
77 LI Amanda C. V D D V D D D 3.6 2 -1.6
78 HONE Katarina G. D D V V D D D 3.2 2 -1.2
79 ATTIA Jasmine D D D V D V D 0.9 2 +1.1
80 FESTA Carina D V D D V D D 2.4 2 -0.4
81 XIKES Katherine E. V D D V D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
82 MULAGARI Sadhika V D D V D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
83 ANGLADE Alexis C. V D D V D D D 4.9 2 -2.9
84 ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. V V D D D D D 3.0 2 -1.0
84 MENDIOLA RITCHIE Ingrid D D V D V D D 2.5 2 -0.5
86 SINHA Anika V V D D D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
87 ALCEBAR Kayla D D V V D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
88 YAO Rainie V D V D D D D 0.9 2 +1.1
89 LEE Hannah D V D D D V D 2.8 2 -0.8
90 CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. D D V D D V 2.2 2 -0.2
91 MCKEE Brynnley D D V V D D 2.6 2 -0.6
92 LIGH Erenei J. D D D V V D 1.3 2 +0.7
93 NATH Trisha D V D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
94 DHAR Aamina D D V V D D 1.4 2 +0.6
95 CHIANG Emily D D V D D V 2.0 2 -
96 BALAKUMARAN Maya D D V D D V 1.9 2 +0.1
97 LI Victoria J. V D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
98 BILILIES Sophia D D V D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
99 JEONG Katie D D D V D D 2.0 1 -1.0
100 LIU Yifei D V D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
101 NI Sharon V D D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
102 WU Helen D V D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
103 WEI JoyAnn D D D D V D 1.1 1 -0.1
104 ZOU Yelin D D D V D D 2.5 1 -1.5
105 GRAFF Sophie D V D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
106 LIN Nicole V D D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
107 HUAI Delilah D D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
108 ENDO Miyuki N. D V D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
109 MUND Ruth D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
110 HE Charlotte D D D D D D 3.2 0 -3.2
110 NGUYEN Siena D D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
112 BROWN Emma D D D D D 2.3 0 -2.3
113 SCOTT Eve D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
113 MARYASH Samantha D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
115 MARTURANO Bridget H. D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
116 YANG Lea D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
117 DAVIS Jayna M. D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
118 LIAO Siwen D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.