The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

Division 1/Parafencing National Championships + April NAC

Div I Women's Saber

Friday, April 26, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Salt Palace Convention Center - Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. V V V V D V V V V V V V 5.7 5 -0.7
2 FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. V D V V V V V V V V V D 5.7 5 -0.7
3 SHEALY Maggie V V V V V D V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
3 ANTHONY Alexia B. D V V V V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
5 LEE Alexandra B. V V V D V V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
6 DELSOIN Chelsea C. V D V V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
7 POSSICK Lola P. V D V V V D V V V D 5.3 4 -1.3
8 TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth V V D D V V V V V D 5.6 4 -1.6
9 LEE Hannah V V V V V D V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
10 MIKA Veronica V V V V V D V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
11 WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. D V V V V V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
12 MCKEE Brynnley V V V D V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
13 SHOMAN Jenna V V D D V V V V D 5.5 4 -1.5
14 JUNG Irene D V V D V V V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
15 BEVACQUA Aria F. D V V D D V V V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
16 LU Vivian Y. D V D D V V V V D 4.4 2 -2.4
17 BURKE Nora S. V V V V V V V D 5.7 6 +0.3
18 KOVACS Sophia V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
19 SULLIVAN Siobhan R. V D V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
20 MILLER Sky V V D V V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
21 NATH Trisha V V V V D V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
22 LIM Jaslene V V V V D V V D 2.5 5 +2.5
23 SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. D V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
24 OISHI Megumi V V D V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
25 LIGH Erenei J. V V V V V D V D 2.9 5 +2.1
26 HILD Nisha V V V V D V D 3.5 4 +0.5
27 GREENBAUM Atara R. V D V V D V V D 5.4 4 -1.4
28 ANDRES Katherine A. D V D V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
29 FREEDMAN Janna N. V V V D V D V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
30 LIN Audrey J. D V V V D D V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
31 JOHNSON Dagny L. V D V V D D V V D 3.0 3 -
32 KIM Marley I. D V D D V V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
33 DRAGON Rainer V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
34 CHIANG Melissa V V V V V V D 1.7 6 +4.3
35 LU Elaine V V V V V D D 3.4 5 +1.6
36 GHAYALOD reya V V V V D V D 4.0 5 +1.0
37 CALLAHAN Chase J. D V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
38 HUAI Delilah D V D V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
39 LAURI Keira V V V V D D D 2.0 4 +2.0
40 LIU Sophie D V D V V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
41 SAYLES Nina R. V V V D D V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
42 NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. D V V D V V V D 5.5 4 -1.5
43 LIU Sydney V V V D V D V D 2.0 4 +2.0
44 JEONG Katie D V V V V D V D 2.4 4 +1.6
45 TABANGAY Heartlyn V V V V D D V D 2.5 4 +1.5
46 ALFARACHE Gabriella C. V D D V V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
47 LIU Yifei V D V D V V D 1.7 3 +1.3
48 SO Catelyn D D V V D V V D 3.0 3 -
49 PAUL Lila D D D V V V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
50 VADASZ Ibla P. V D V V D D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
50 TSUI Natalie V V V D D D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
52 KER Grace V D D V V D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
53 FEARNS Zara A. D D V V D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
54 JOHNSON Lydia V D D D V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
54 KRASTEV Minna V V V D D D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
56 SPEARS Mya B V D D V D V V D 1.6 3 +1.4
56 GUGALA Hanna D D V V V D V D 1.7 3 +1.3
58 LIN Nicole D V D V D V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
59 YANG Angelina LeLe V D D V D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
60 VESTEL Mira B. D D D V V D V D 3.6 2 -1.6
61 BOIS Adele D D V D V D V D 4.0 2 -2.0
62 MARTURANO Bridget H. D V D D D V V D 3.5 2 -1.5
63 CHIARELLI Valentina D D D D V V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
64 MARYASH Samantha D D D D V V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
65 NGUYEN Siena V V D D V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
66 ZOLLER Noelle V V D V D V D 1.1 4 +2.9
67 BARNOVITZ Maya D V D V V D D 2.0 3 +1.0
68 GOMERMAN Sophia V D V V D D D 1.8 3 +1.2
69 ANDRES Charmaine G. D V V D V D D 4.4 3 -1.4
70 ZHANG XUANYI D V D V V D D 2.9 3 +0.1
71 SHI Cathleen V D V D V D D 3.5 3 -0.5
72 YANG Lea V V D V D D D 2.5 3 +0.5
73 VINOGOROVA Sofiia V D D D V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
74 FEIG Sela D V D D V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
75 LI Amanda C. D D V V V D D 3.4 3 -0.4
76 XIONG Haojiao V V D V D D D 2.7 3 +0.3
77 BOYNTON Ainsley V D V V D D D 1.9 3 +1.1
78 PABIAN Emilia V D V D V D D 1.9 3 +1.1
79 ZENG Sarah D D V D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
80 HAMMERSTROM Aria D V D V D D 1.1 2 +0.9
81 TSE Angelina V D V D D D D 3.3 2 -1.3
82 ATTIA Jasmine D V D D V D D 1.6 2 +0.4
83 CHAVAN Arya D V V D D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
84 YOUNG Charlotte G. V D D D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
85 FAVO Isabella D D D V D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
86 LU Amy V D D D V D D 3.5 2 -1.5
87 SCOTT Eve D V D D V D D 2.1 2 -0.1
88 YAO Rainie V D V D D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
89 LEE Sophia D D D V D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
90 RAMIREZ Mirka A. D D D V D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
91 ARNOLD Hali V D V D D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
91 FESTA Carina V V D D D D D 2.9 2 -0.9
93 MUND Ruth D V V D D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
94 XU Emily T. D V D V D D D 1.3 2 +0.7
95 ZHENG Valentina D D D V D V D 1.0 2 +1.0
96 WEI JoyAnn D D D D V V D 1.6 2 +0.4
97 DAI Olivia D D D D V V 1.6 2 +0.4
98 MANN Sophia J. D V D D V D 2.0 2 -
99 KHAN Alissa D D D V D D 2.1 1 -1.1
99 GAUTAM Sahana D D D D D V 2.4 1 -1.4
101 MAKLIN Sofia D D D D V D 2.4 1 -1.4
102 CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. D D D D D V 2.2 1 -1.2
103 WANG yining D D D V D D 2.2 1 -1.2
104 ERIKSON Kira R. D V D D D D 4.1 1 -3.1
105 TONG Jessie D V D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
106 GRULICH Rayaana V D D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
107 DHAR Layla D D D D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
108 MEDVINSKY Alexandra V D D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
109 HU Anna D D V D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
110 HU Michelle D D D D D V 1.7 1 -0.7
111 WANG Alice D D V D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
112 MERCHANT Aishwarya D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
112 BERMAN greta D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
114 DANTULURI Shalini D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
115 GRAJALES Hannah E. D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
116 BUHAY Kirsten M. D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
116 LEOU Korina D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
118 YAM Danika D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.