Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC/Y8

Cadet Men's Foil

Friday, November 23, 2018 at 8:15 AM

Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 ZHANG Daniel D. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 73% 29%
2 KIM Nicholas W. 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 58% 15%
3 YU Vinni 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 60% 21%
3 LEE Caden 100% 100% 99% 92% 70% 36% 8%
5 WONG Adam L. 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 36% 7%
6 CHOI Jiwoo J. 100% 100% 97% 83% 54% 22% 4%
7 ZUSIN Zachary W. 100% 100% 96% 74% 35% 7%
8 WAN Jason 100% 100% 97% 83% 52% 19% 3%
9 SACCOCCIO Nicholas P. 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 36% 7%
10 TORO Alejandro 100% 100% 98% 86% 52% 17% 2%
11 MCCLAIN Bryce C. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 50%
12 LOCKWOOD Owen 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 65% 23%
13 TSAI Philip W. 100% 99% 87% 56% 20% 3%
14 BOBROW Logan 100% 99% 93% 73% 39% 12% 1%
15 KASI Sanjay 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 34%
16 LEE Daniel C. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 51% 13%
17 ZHANG Henry C. 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 50% 12%
18 MA Alexander 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 30% 5%
19 HOOSHI Dylan M. 100% 100% 100% 94% 72% 29%
20 LIANG Lixi (Henry) 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 21%
21 AUGUSTINE Ethan A. 100% 100% 97% 81% 46% 11%
22 CHENG Jonathan 100% 100% 100% 95% 72% 29%
23 CHENG Thomas C. 100% 100% 98% 85% 55% 21% 3%
23 WU Nicholas 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 14% 2%
25 PELOSKY Zack B. 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 24% 4%
26 JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) 100% 100% 98% 85% 52% 18% 2%
27 DOCTOR Aidan L. 100% 100% 95% 77% 44% 14% 1%
28 JEON Caleb A. 100% 99% 90% 62% 26% 5% -
29 LIAO Alex J. 100% 100% 98% 83% 44% 12% 1%
30 FU Samuel Y. 100% 98% 83% 51% 17% 2%
31 SHIKHMAN Robert 100% 97% 75% 36% 8% 1%
32 BAS Liam 100% 100% 97% 80% 44% 11%
33 DESERANNO Jeidus 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 36%
34 BREIER Matthew F. 100% 98% 82% 46% 13% 1%
34 ZHANG Andy W. 100% 100% 97% 80% 43% 10%
36 PRILUTSKY David B. 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 22%
37 SCHENCK Koen M. 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 46% 12%
38 ONIK Elijah T. 100% 98% 87% 60% 26% 6% 1%
40 FINN Mark T. 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 27% 5%
41 PAE Jonathan L. 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 24% 4%
42 JANG Jaewon 100% 100% 99% 91% 63% 21%
43 BING Charles 100% 97% 74% 36% 9% 1%
44 HU Robin 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 29%
45 KIM Yonjae 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 62% 19%
46 VASILIEV Sacha M. 100% 100% 98% 89% 65% 32% 8%
47 DEGREMONT Henri S. 100% 100% 98% 84% 52% 19% 3%
48 FUKUDA Alessio R. 100% 82% 43% 13% 2% - -
49 ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. 100% 100% 93% 66% 27% 5% -
50 GALLUCCI Charles John 100% 100% 98% 89% 63% 27% 4%
51 PARK Ryan 100% 100% 96% 77% 43% 14% 2%
52 FUKUDA Renzo K. 100% 93% 65% 29% 7% 1% -
53 GEE Brandon 100% 99% 91% 64% 27% 5%
53 TIAN Aaron C. 100% 98% 83% 45% 12% 1%
55 CHAN Tyler 100% 100% 94% 73% 35% 7%
56 MACRAE Harrison A. 100% 98% 83% 51% 19% 3% -
57 ORTIZ Zachary M. 100% 100% 99% 93% 73% 38% 8%
58 LIU Kevin B. 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 21% 3%
59 OURSLER Jack 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 39%
60 MARX Oscar L. 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 19%
61 ZELTSER Lawrence M. 100% 83% 41% 11% 2% - -
62 REZNICK Nicholas J. 100% 100% 94% 73% 38% 11% 1%
63 SINGH Dayaal 100% 100% 96% 79% 43% 11%
64 FU Yifan 100% 96% 69% 26% 3% - -
65 LI Yulei 100% 98% 83% 46% 13% 1%
66 YEROKHIN Michael N. 100% 100% 98% 81% 44% 10%
68 NAGER Noah 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 25% 4%
70 PYO Michael M. 100% 95% 72% 35% 9% 1% -
71 KEE Andrew L. 100% 97% 78% 44% 15% 3% -
72 SHA Yi Peng 100% 99% 88% 58% 23% 5% -
73 HUTTENBACH Koren A. 100% 100% 97% 79% 44% 13% 2%
74 ALIMI Yacine A. 100% 69% 27% 6% 1% - -
75 COSTELLO Chaissen F. 100% 95% 63% 23% 4% -
76 HOOSHI Jayden C. 100% 98% 80% 42% 12% 1%
77 BAE Kevin 100% 100% 93% 64% 26% 5% -
78 DU Samuel R. 100% 100% 95% 75% 37% 8% 1%
79 KAO Castor T. 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 59% 19%
80 TSAI Max W. 100% 95% 67% 28% 6% 1% -
81 BOOTSMA Shane-Anson 100% 89% 55% 19% 3% - -
82 YULDASHEV Timur 100% 96% 70% 29% 6% 1% -
83 ALONSOZANA Luke 100% 93% 66% 29% 7% 1% -
84 SPOSATO Luke B. 100% 40% 7% 1% - -
85 KOLKER Gregory A. 100% 78% 37% 10% 1% -
86 MUNDAHL Brandon D. 100% 80% 38% 9% 1% -
87 HAN Lawrence 100% 96% 70% 30% 6% -
88 MAHNKEN Thomas P. 100% 57% 17% 2% - -
89 LIN Dennis 100% 67% 23% 4% - - -
90 BANERJEE Anup 100% 100% 97% 82% 50% 18% 3%
91 LE Vyn A. 100% 100% 96% 78% 44% 13% 1%
92 DAI Jonathan T. 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 14% 2%
93 PAE Brian L. 100% 99% 91% 62% 22% 3% -
94 KWON Ethan 100% 99% 92% 67% 31% 7% 1%
95 GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas 100% 97% 78% 40% 11% 1% -
96 ARANA Massimo 100% 76% 34% 8% 1% - -
97 PAN Eric 100% 96% 76% 41% 14% 3% -
98 ANTONIO Marcky C. 100% 76% 35% 9% 1% - -
99 KIZHNER Fillip 100% 83% 45% 13% 2% - -
99 MUNDAHL Morgan K. 100% 82% 40% 10% 1% - -
101 MAISONNEUVE Alexis 100% 99% 93% 70% 33% 8% 1%
102 WANG Gerald Y. 100% 75% 28% 5% 1% - -
103 QI Steve 100% 80% 32% 6% 1% - -
104 JIN Dennis H. 100% 93% 68% 32% 9% 1% -
105 ZHONG Guoren 100% 74% 32% 8% 1% - -
106 CAI Oliver K. 100% 93% 63% 27% 6% 1% -
107 WEI William 100% 63% 20% 3% - -
108 SONG Leonardo T. 100% 53% 11% 1% - - -
108 WERWA Griffith 100% 85% 49% 17% 3% - -
110 TOMRUK Batu 100% 87% 37% 7% 1% - -
111 ZHANG Evan 100% 87% 46% 13% 2% -
111 ZHAO Jesse 100% 70% 21% 3% - -
113 YOST Jacob A. 100% 42% 7% 1% - - -
114 MOROZE Daniel 100% 69% 27% 6% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.