Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Zoe | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 2 | AVAKIAN Mikaela | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 3 | GOUHIN Chloe | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% |
| 3 | MOYA Keona L. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 5 | FAHRI Monir J. | - | 2% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
| 6 | KOZAK Sonja A. | 1% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 7 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 8 | HUNTER Nina B. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 9 | CAO Stephanie X. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% |
| 10 | LU Vivian Y. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 34% | 6% |
| 11 | LIANG Megan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 12 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 37% | 8% |
| 13 | LI Anna M. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 14 | TZOU Alexandra | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 15 | CHERNOMORSKY Maria | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% |
| 16 | TANG Annie L. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 9% |
| 17 | HARRISON Imogen N. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 18 | BUCHMANN Vivien | - | 5% | 24% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 19 | MILLER Sky | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
| 20 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 21 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 21 | ROH Rachel E. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 23 | PAK Kaitlyn | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 24 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 25 | KIM Catherine | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 27 | BERMAN Stella | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
| 28 | PRIESTLEY Catherine (Cate) C. | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 28 | WU Erica L. | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 30 | YAP Madeline | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 31 | FLOREZ Melissa | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
| 32 | DI PERNA Chiara I. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
| 33 | KOVACS Sophia | - | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% |
| 34 | WHANG Rebecca | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 35 | KATZ Anat | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 36 | OISHI Megumi | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
| 37 | KONG Vera | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 38 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 39 | KALRA Himani V. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
| 40 | SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
| 41 | HOOGENDOORN Sterre | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 42 | YUN Maya | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 43 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 44 | TONG Kunling | 4% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 45 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 4% |
| 46 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 47 | LACSON Sarah | 16% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | MARSEE Samantha | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 49 | BEALE Zoe M. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 50 | KOBOZEVA Tamara V. | 2% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 51 | DUNGEY Amelia S. | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 52 | CHIN Erika J. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 53 | BLUM Leah I. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 54 | DARINGA Arianna | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 55 | CHEEMA Sophia | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 56 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | - | 1% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 57 | WEINBERG Alexandra L. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 40% | 14% |
| 58 | HOOGENDOORN Levi | 9% | 44% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | REDDY Shreya | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 60 | KALRA Siya L. | 11% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 61 | TANG Catherine H. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 62 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 63 | LAMOTHE Laurie-Ann | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 64 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 65 | ATLURI Sara V. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 18% | 3% |
| 66 | HAN Jeanette X. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 67 | CHING Sapphira S. | 2% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 68 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 6% |
| 69 | STONE Hava S. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 70 | NOBREGA Carolina S. | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 71 | BROWN Emma | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 72 | BOURGEOIS Audreane | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 73 | CHEN Jane | 1% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 74 | TUCKER Iman R. | 1% | 11% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 75 | BENTOLILA Thalia | 6% | 31% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 76 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | 6% | 25% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 77 | JULIEN Michelle | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 78 | MATAIEV Natalie S. | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 79 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 80 | BURCH Makana Y. | - | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 81 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 82 | HE Charlotte | 1% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 83 | SCHMITT Alana P. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 83 | LARIMER Katherine E. | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 85 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
| 86 | VAN ATTA Grace Y. | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 87 | CANNON Sophia E. | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 88 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 2% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 89 | CODY Alexandra C. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 15% | 2% |
| 90 | PANIGRAHI Sophia | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 91 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 92 | LIU Rachel | 29% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 93 | D'ORAZIO Isabella | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 94 | LU Amy | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 95 | LI Victoria J. | 14% | 33% | 32% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 96 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 97 | CHEN Erica | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 98 | LIGH Karis | 26% | 51% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 99 | GAJOWSKYJ Sophie K. | 12% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 100 | CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 101 | ABOUDAHER Janna A. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 102 | RIZKALA Joanna | 12% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 102 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
| 102 | SZETO Chloe | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 105 | HOVERMAN Hannah A. | 11% | 41% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 106 | TURNOF Kayla M. | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 106 | CHEN Xinyan | 44% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 108 | MERRIAM Katherine I. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 109 | BAE EMMELINE | 41% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 110 | ZINNI Kaylyn M. | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 111 | PETE Gillian C. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 112 | BENTOLILA Yedida | 38% | 41% | 17% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 113 | FAY Zoe A. | 12% | 43% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 114 | DHAR Aamina | 13% | 40% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 115 | LIN Zhiyin | 28% | 59% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 116 | WHEELER Kira | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 116 | RANGANATHAN Ruchi | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 118 | FU Linqian (Helen) | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 119 | CUNNINGHAM Erin | 20% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.