The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

October NAC

Cadet Women's Saber

Monday, October 15, 2018 at 8:00 AM

Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 KIM Zoe V V V V V V V V V V V V 3.0 6 +3.0
2 AVAKIAN Mikaela V V V V V V V V V V V D 4.3 6 +1.7
3 GOUHIN Chloe V V V V V V V V V V D 4.4 6 +1.6
3 MOYA Keona L. V V V V V V V V V V D 3.4 6 +2.6
5 FAHRI Monir J. V V V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
6 KOZAK Sonja A. V V D V V V V V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
7 SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda V V V D V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
8 HUNTER Nina B. V V V D D V V V V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
9 CAO Stephanie X. V V V V V D V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
10 LU Vivian Y. V D V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
11 LIANG Megan V V V D V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
12 WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. D V V D V V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
13 LI Anna M. D V V V V D V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
14 TZOU Alexandra V D D D V V V V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
15 CHERNOMORSKY Maria V V V D D D V V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
16 TANG Annie L. D V V V D D V V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
17 HARRISON Imogen N. V D V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
18 BUCHMANN Vivien V V V V D V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
19 MILLER Sky V V V D V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
20 POSSICK Lola P. V V V V V D V D 5.1 5 -0.1
21 GREENBAUM Atara R. V V D V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
21 ROH Rachel E. D V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
23 PAK Kaitlyn V V V V V D V D 3.9 5 +1.1
24 GREENBAUM Ella K. V V V D D V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
25 KIM Catherine D V V D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
26 LEE Alexandra B. D D V V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
27 BERMAN Stella V V D V V D V D 3.9 4 +0.1
28 PRIESTLEY Catherine (Cate) C. D V V D V V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
28 WU Erica L. V V V D V D V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
30 YAP Madeline V D V V D V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
31 FLOREZ Melissa V V D V D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
32 DI PERNA Chiara I. D D D V V V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
33 KOVACS Sophia V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
34 WHANG Rebecca V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
35 KATZ Anat V V D V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
36 OISHI Megumi V V D V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
37 KONG Vera D V V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
38 STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. V D V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
39 KALRA Himani V. V V V V V D D 4.3 5 +0.7
40 SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. V V V D V D D 5.1 4 -1.1
41 HOOGENDOORN Sterre D D V V V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
42 YUN Maya V V D V D V D 3.4 4 +0.6
43 DELSOIN Chelsea C. D V D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
44 TONG Kunling V D V D V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
45 SULLIVAN Siobhan R. D V D V V V V D 4.0 4 -
46 WILLIAMS Chloe C. V V V D V D V D 2.3 4 +1.7
47 LACSON Sarah D V V V V D V D 1.4 4 +2.6
47 MARSEE Samantha V V D V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
49 BEALE Zoe M. V V D D V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
50 KOBOZEVA Tamara V. V V V D D V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
51 DUNGEY Amelia S. D D D V V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
52 CHIN Erika J. D V V D V D V D 4.2 3 -1.2
53 BLUM Leah I. V D D D V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
54 DARINGA Arianna V D D V V D V D 3.7 3 -0.7
55 CHEEMA Sophia D V V D D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
56 WIGGERS Susan Q. V V V D D D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
57 WEINBERG Alexandra L. V D D V V D V D 4.6 3 -1.6
58 HOOGENDOORN Levi D D D V D V V D 1.5 2 +0.5
59 REDDY Shreya D V D V D D V D 3.6 2 -1.6
60 KALRA Siya L. D V D V D D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
61 TANG Catherine H. D V V D D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
62 FREEDMAN Janna N. D V V D D D V D 3.8 2 -1.8
63 LAMOTHE Laurie-Ann D V V D D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
64 ZIELINSKI Isabella G. D D V D D D V D 2.6 1 -1.6
65 ATLURI Sara V. V V V V D D D 3.7 4 +0.3
66 HAN Jeanette X. D V V V V D D 2.2 4 +1.8
67 CHING Sapphira S. V V D V V D D 2.6 4 +1.4
68 GUTHIKONDA Nithya D V D V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
69 STONE Hava S. D D V V D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
70 NOBREGA Carolina S. V D D V V D D 1.7 3 +1.3
71 BROWN Emma D V V D D V D 2.7 3 +0.3
72 BOURGEOIS Audreane D D V V V D D 2.3 3 +0.7
73 CHEN Jane V D V D D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
74 TUCKER Iman R. V D D D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
75 BENTOLILA Thalia V V D V D D D 1.9 3 +1.1
76 SATHYANATH Kailing V D D V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
77 JULIEN Michelle D D D V V D D 4.8 2 -2.8
78 MATAIEV Natalie S. D D D V V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
79 OXENSTIERNA Carolina D D D V D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
80 BURCH Makana Y. D D V D V D D 3.0 2 -1.0
81 SHIN Andrea Y. D D D V D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
82 HE Charlotte D D V D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
83 SCHMITT Alana P. V D D D D V D 2.8 2 -0.8
83 LARIMER Katherine E. D V V D D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
85 TIMOFEYEV Nicole V D V D D D D 3.1 2 -1.1
86 VAN ATTA Grace Y. D V D D D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
87 CANNON Sophia E. D D V D D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
88 GORMAN Victoria M. D V D V D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
89 CODY Alexandra C. D V D D V D D 3.7 2 -1.7
90 PANIGRAHI Sophia D V D D V D D 2.3 2 -0.3
91 KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) D D V D D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
92 LIU Rachel D D V D D V D 1.0 2 +1.0
93 D'ORAZIO Isabella V D D V D D D 1.2 2 +0.8
94 LU Amy V D D D V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
95 LI Victoria J. D D V D V D D 1.6 2 +0.4
96 NEWELL Alexia C. D D V D V D D 3.7 2 -1.7
97 CHEN Erica D V D D D D 3.3 1 -2.3
98 LIGH Karis D V D D D D 1.0 1 -
99 GAJOWSKYJ Sophie K. D D D D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
100 CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. D D V D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
101 ABOUDAHER Janna A. V D D D D D 3.2 1 -2.2
102 RIZKALA Joanna D V D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
102 NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. D V D D D D 3.6 1 -2.6
102 SZETO Chloe D D D D V D 1.7 1 -0.7
105 HOVERMAN Hannah A. D D D V D D 1.5 1 -0.5
106 TURNOF Kayla M. D D V D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
106 CHEN Xinyan V D D D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
108 MERRIAM Katherine I. D D V D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
109 BAE EMMELINE D D D D V D 0.8 1 +0.2
110 ZINNI Kaylyn M. D D D V D D 3.6 1 -2.6
111 PETE Gillian C. V D D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
112 BENTOLILA Yedida D D D D D V 0.9 1 +0.1
113 FAY Zoe A. D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
114 DHAR Aamina D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
115 LIN Zhiyin D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
116 WHEELER Kira D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
116 RANGANATHAN Ruchi D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
118 FU Linqian (Helen) D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
119 CUNNINGHAM Erin D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.