Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | SONG Leonardo T. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 3 | OH SEAN | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 3 | JITTAN daniel | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 5 | SICHITIU Alexander | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 6 | GATZA Logan | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 7 | CANO Marcos E. | V V D V | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 8 | LONG Connor M. | D V V V D D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 9 | HEARN Christen J. | V V V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 10 | TIYA BIAYA K. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 11 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 12 | SAGE Michael J. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 13 | MAHRAN-GALINDO Alex | V V V D D V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 14 | ZHAO Dylan L. | V D V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 15 | WONG Garrick G. | D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 16 | BERNABE Rafael | D V D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 17 | GIBBS Grant N. | V V V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 18 | EMENHEISER Conrad | V D D V V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 19 | TANG Owen S. | D V V V V D | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 20 | LEE Jacob | D V V D V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 21 | ROSE Ben | V D D D V V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 22 | KNIZHNIK David | V V D D V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 23 | TANG August L. | D D V V D V | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 24 | SONG Austin | D D D D V V | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 25 | QIAN Jason H. | D D V D V D | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 26 | YANG Alan H. | V V D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 27 | LEE Lukas | D D V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 28 | ROSS III Paul D. | V D D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 29 | QUINTERO Julian | D D V D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 30 | DE COQUET Maximilian | V D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 31 | BUCHENHORST Anton | D V D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 32 | CHEN Junxuan | V D D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 33 | HYUN Seojun | D V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 34 | BERNARD Jack B. | D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 35 | YUAN Austin | V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 36 | HUANG Justin | V D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 37 | PANTIN Ethan M. | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 38 | WANG Brayden | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 39 | DICKSON Evan | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 40 | SUERSTEDT Haydn | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.