UNG Gainesville PE Complex - Gainesville, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MENKE Kavya I. | V V V D D | V V V V V | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 2 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | V D D V V | V V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 3 | DU Gavin J. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 3 | FONZO Ian | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 5 | LISSO Ria A. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | RICH Jack | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 7 | WALLACE Cade | V V V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 8 | RAULS Jackson V. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 9 | EDWARDS Darby | V V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 10 | DICKINSON Leonard H. | V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 11 | KELLNER Taylor T. | V V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 12 | LU Caleb Q. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 13 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | V V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 14 | RICHERSON James | V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 15 | LOGGINS Austin J. | D V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 16 | DAWSON Todd | D V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 17 | CROWLEY James | D V D V V V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 18 | PATEL Jeet | V D D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 19 | GRAHAM Ian | V D D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 20 | HAMILL Daniel | V D V D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 21 | SANDERS Brittany | V D V D V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 22 | HE Nikaia | D V V V D D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 23 | BOONE Jason | V D D D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 24 | ROBINSON Wesley | D V D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 25 | JAYASANKAR Hari | D V V D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 26 | HOLDER Thomas | V D D V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 27 | KIEU Jimmy | V D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 28 | GIRARD Parker | D V D D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 29 | VIDRINE Odile | D D V D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 30 | WANG Andy | D V D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 31 | DESHETLER Scott | D D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 32 | HOLEVINSKI Anthony | D D D D V | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 33 | CHEN Ethan | V V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 34 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU Alexandra | D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 35 | ORLOFSKY Sydney | D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 36 | LIU Iris | D D V D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 37 | ADIBZADEH Mehrdad | D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 38 | TAYLOR Kathleen | D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 39 | OZMER Joseph | D D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 40 | SCHIPPER Bonnie | D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 41 | CONREY Chris | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 42 | CREVELING Kathryn | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 43 | CHO Kyung Jin | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.