Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | OLSEN Natalie J. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 2 | PAK Kaitlyn | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 3 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 3 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% |
| 5 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
| 6 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 7 | JULIEN Michelle | - | - | 3% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 6% |
| 8 | STONE Hava S. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% |
| 9 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% |
| 10 | TAO Hannah J. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
| 11 | KOO Samantha | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% | |
| 12 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 13 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% | |
| 14 | CHIOLDI Mina | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 15 | CANNON Sophia E. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | HAN Jeanette X. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 17 | LI Amanda C. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 18 | CHING Sapphira S. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 19 | TANG Annie L. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 22% |
| 20 | CAO Stephanie X. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% |
| 20 | LU Amy | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
| 22 | TONG Kunling | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% | |
| 23 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
| 24 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 25 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 26 | WEBER Juliana I. | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 27 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | - | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | |
| 28 | KATZ Anat | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
| 29 | CHEN Erica | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 7% |
| 30 | SINHA Anika | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 31 | KOBOZEVA Tamara V. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 32 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 33 | GORMAN Victoria M. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 34 | HU Allison C. | 4% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | KALRA Himani V. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
| 36 | TUCKER Iman R. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
| 37 | WU Erica L. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 38 | CHANG Emily | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 39 | HILD Nisha | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 40 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% | |
| 41 | CANSECO Laura K. | 2% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 42 | MIKA Veronica | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 43 | LU Yi Lin | 1% | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | 2% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 44 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 46 | CHEN Xinyan | - | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 47 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 48 | SHOMAN Miriam | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 49 | BUHAY Rachel T. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 50 | WEI Vivian W. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 51 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 52 | YANG Ashley M. | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% | |
| 53 | TODD Phoebe | 14% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | LIN Selena | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 55 | NEIBART Fiona | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 56 | RIZKALA Joanna | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 57 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 58 | MATAIEV Natalie S. | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 59 | DARINGA Arianna | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 60 | YUAN Greta | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 61 | DHAR Aamina | 1% | 30% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 62 | RHIE Lena | 3% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 63 | NG Sarah W. | 1% | 23% | 48% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 64 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 65 | JENKINS Scotland | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | YANG Kaitlyn H. | - | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 67 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 1% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 68 | GIRARDI Aemilia | 5% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 69 | BILILIES Sophia | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 70 | JAVERI Amaya | 38% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 71 | BAKER Amelia M. | 3% | 45% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | 11% | 47% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 73 | LIAO Siwen | 9% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 74 | JIN Olivia P. | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 75 | BHOGAL Sukhleen | 64% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 76 | WILSON Isley N. | - | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 77 | SCHIKORE Anna M. | 24% | 43% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 79 | CHIANG Emily | 2% | 18% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 80 | WHEELER Kira | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 81 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 82 | HORMEL Molly | 92% | 8% | - | - | - | - | |
| 83 | MANTOAN Adeline L. | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 83 | ZENG Megan | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 85 | HUANG Lily | 88% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 86 | CONGIUSTA Aelex | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 87 | MEYTIN Sophia E. | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.