The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

USA Fencing Baltimore SJCC Tournament

Junior Women's Saber

Sunday, March 1, 2020 at 1:00 PM

Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 OLSEN Natalie J. V V V V D V V V V V V V 3.9 5 +1.1
2 PAK Kaitlyn V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
3 GUTHIKONDA Nithya V V V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
3 NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. V V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
5 POSSICK Lola P. V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
6 SATHYANATH Kailing V V V V V D V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
7 JULIEN Michelle V V D V D V V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
8 STONE Hava S. V D V V V D V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
9 LEE Alexandra B. V V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
10 TAO Hannah J. V V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
11 KOO Samantha V V V V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
12 FREEDMAN Janna N. V V V D V V V V D 5.0 5 -
13 SHOMAN Jenna V D V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
14 CHIOLDI Mina V V V V D V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
15 CANNON Sophia E. V D D V D V V V V D 3.0 3 -
16 HAN Jeanette X. D V V D D V V V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
17 LI Amanda C. V V V V V V V D 3.9 6 +2.1
18 CHING Sapphira S. V V V V D V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
19 TANG Annie L. V V D V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
20 CAO Stephanie X. V V V V V D V D 4.2 5 +0.8
20 LU Amy V D V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
22 TONG Kunling V V D V V V D 4.0 4 -
23 WIGGERS Susan Q. D V V V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
24 ANDRES Charmaine G. V V D V D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
25 DELSOIN Chelsea C. V D D V V V V D 4.0 4 -
26 WEBER Juliana I. D D V V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
27 BHATTACHARJEE Rhea D V V D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
28 KATZ Anat D V D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
29 CHEN Erica D V V D V D V D 4.1 3 -1.1
30 SINHA Anika D V D V V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
31 KOBOZEVA Tamara V. D D V D V V V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
32 NYSTROM Sofia C. D D D V V D V V D 2.6 2 -0.6
33 GORMAN Victoria M. V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
34 HU Allison C. V V V D V V D 2.1 5 +2.9
35 KALRA Himani V. V D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
36 TUCKER Iman R. V V V V D D 2.9 4 +1.1
37 WU Erica L. D V D V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
38 CHANG Emily D V D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
39 HILD Nisha V V V D V D D 3.2 4 +0.8
40 ALCEBAR Kayla V V D V D D 3.3 3 -0.3
41 CANSECO Laura K. V V V D D D 2.5 3 +0.5
42 MIKA Veronica V V D D V D D 4.0 3 -1.0
43 LU Yi Lin V D V D D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
44 DEPEW Charlotte R. V D D V V D D 2.4 3 +0.6
44 NEWELL Alexia C. V D V D D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
46 CHEN Xinyan D V V D V D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
47 BALAKUMARAN Maya V V D D D V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
48 SHOMAN Miriam D V D V D V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
49 BUHAY Rachel T. V D D V D V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
50 WEI Vivian W. D D V V V D V D 2.1 3 +0.9
51 ANDRES Katherine A. D V D D V V D 2.6 2 -0.6
52 YANG Ashley M. D D V D V V D 3.1 2 -1.1
53 TODD Phoebe D V V D D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
54 LIN Selena D V D D V D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
55 NEIBART Fiona D D V D V D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
56 RIZKALA Joanna D D D V D V V D 3.4 2 -1.4
57 SUBRAMANIAN Nitika D V D D V D V D 2.8 2 -0.8
58 MATAIEV Natalie S. V D D D D V V D 2.3 2 -0.3
59 DARINGA Arianna D D D V V D V D 2.8 2 -0.8
60 YUAN Greta D V D V D D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
61 DHAR Aamina D V D D D V D 2.0 1 -1.0
62 RHIE Lena D D D D D V V D 2.2 1 -1.2
63 NG Sarah W. D D D D D V V D 2.1 1 -1.1
64 BEVACQUA Aria F. D D D D D V D 1.5 0 -1.5
65 JENKINS Scotland V V D D V D D 1.1 3 +1.9
66 YANG Kaitlyn H. V D V D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
67 SLOBODSKY Sasha L. V D V D D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
68 GIRARDI Aemilia D D V V D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
69 BILILIES Sophia V D V D D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
70 JAVERI Amaya D D V D D V D 0.9 2 +1.1
71 BAKER Amelia M. D D V D V D D 1.6 2 +0.4
72 GUTHIKONDA Sunanya V D D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
73 LIAO Siwen D D D D V D 1.7 1 -0.7
74 JIN Olivia P. V D D D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
75 BHOGAL Sukhleen D D D V D D 0.4 1 +0.6
76 WILSON Isley N. D D V D D D D 3.1 1 -2.1
77 SCHIKORE Anna M. D D V D D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
78 D'ORAZIO Sofia V. D D D V D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
79 CHIANG Emily D V D D D D D 2.4 1 -1.4
80 WHEELER Kira D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
81 ZIELINSKI Isabella G. D D D D D D D 3.0 0 -3.0
82 HORMEL Molly D D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1
83 MANTOAN Adeline L. D D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
83 ZENG Megan D D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
85 HUANG Lily D D D D D D D 0.1 0 -0.1
86 CONGIUSTA Aelex D D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
87 MEYTIN Sophia E. D D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.