Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | O'LOUGHLIN Chris S. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 34% | 61% |
| 2 | TEPEDELENLIOGLU Mehmet | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 48% | 15% |
| 3 | NORMILE Jon M. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
| 3 | HOFFMANN Christopher J. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 5 | LANG Markus | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 6 | HAYENGA Gary M. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 7 | JOHNSON Jeff | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 8 | SUPONYA Sergey | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
| 9 | REES Daniel I. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 10 | FRANK Fred | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 11 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% |
| 12 | CRANOR Erich L. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 13 | LEE PETER H. | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | < 1% | - |
| 14 | BAILEY Creston P. | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 15 | BLANCHARD Aaron (Sam) S. | 1% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 16 | BAXTER David | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | WILSON Jeffrey M. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 39% | 8% |
| 18 | BARREIRO Darren | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 19 | KURITZ Marc M. | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 20 | GILLHAM Timothy A. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 21 | MAR Kevin | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 22 | FELDMAN Adam | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 23 | GUMAGAY Paul | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 24 | LOEFFLER Carl E. | - | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 25 | WOZNIAK Greg | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 26 | WAY Kashi M. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 27 | CHERNYSHOV Max | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 28 | KENT Dwain | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 29 | JENSEN David | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 30 | SWANSON Dave | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | REID Michael | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | SANCHEZ Leon D. | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 33 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 34 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 34 | PIERRO Roger | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 36 | NEMAZIE David A. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 37 | STEVENS Terrence | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 38 | CHEN Chang-Rung | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 39 | BALESTRACCI Chris | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 40 | KISSINGFORD John F. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 41 | KANE Tim | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | WILLIAMS Richard | 40% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 43 | COTLAR Andrew D. | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 44 | HEKMAT Sina R. | - | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 45 | WEINTRAUB Adam | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | BUSH Thomas | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 47 | DESAMOURS Georges H. | 3% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 47 | COETZEE Frans M. | 7% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 49 | POPOVICI Alexander M. | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | KOKENGE Chad | 7% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 51 | LEE Richard U. | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | VAUGHN David | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 53 | SAWASDIKOSOL Sansana | 17% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | MAYS Sean | 19% | 45% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | SIMS Martin L. | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 56 | SCHARF David | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.