Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | O'LOUGHLIN Chris S. | V V D V V V | V V V V V V | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 2 | TEPEDELENLIOGLU Mehmet | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 3 | NORMILE Jon M. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 3 | HOFFMANN Christopher J. | V V V D D D | V V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 5 | LANG Markus | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 6 | HAYENGA Gary M. | V D V V V D | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 7 | JOHNSON Jeff | V D V V D V | V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 8 | SUPONYA Sergey | D V D V D V | V V V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 9 | REES Daniel I. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 10 | FRANK Fred | V D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 11 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 12 | CRANOR Erich L. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 13 | LEE PETER H. | V D V V V V | V D | 1.6 | 5 | +3.4 |
| 14 | BAILEY Creston P. | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 15 | BLANCHARD Aaron (Sam) S. | D D D V V V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 16 | BAXTER David | V D D D D D | V V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 17 | WILSON Jeffrey M. | V V V D V V | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 18 | BARREIRO Darren | V D V V V V | D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 19 | KURITZ Marc M. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 20 | GILLHAM Timothy A. | V D V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 21 | MAR Kevin | D D V V V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 22 | FELDMAN Adam | V D V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 23 | GUMAGAY Paul | D V D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 24 | LOEFFLER Carl E. | V V D V D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 25 | WOZNIAK Greg | V V D V D D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 26 | WAY Kashi M. | D D V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 27 | CHERNYSHOV Max | V V V D D D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 28 | KENT Dwain | D V D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 29 | JENSEN David | V V D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 30 | SWANSON Dave | V D D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 31 | REID Michael | D V D V D D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 32 | SANCHEZ Leon D. | D V D D V D | V | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 33 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | V V D V V D | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 34 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | V V D V D V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 34 | PIERRO Roger | D V V V V D | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 36 | NEMAZIE David A. | D V V D D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 37 | STEVENS Terrence | D D V V V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 38 | CHEN Chang-Rung | V D D D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 39 | BALESTRACCI Chris | D V V D D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 40 | KISSINGFORD John F. | D D V D D V | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 41 | KANE Tim | D D V V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 42 | WILLIAMS Richard | V D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 43 | COTLAR Andrew D. | D D D D V V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 44 | HEKMAT Sina R. | D V D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 45 | WEINTRAUB Adam | D D V D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 46 | BUSH Thomas | D D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 47 | DESAMOURS Georges H. | D D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 47 | COETZEE Frans M. | D D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 49 | POPOVICI Alexander M. | D V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 50 | KOKENGE Chad | D V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 51 | LEE Richard U. | V D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 52 | VAUGHN David | D D V D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 53 | SAWASDIKOSOL Sansana | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 54 | MAYS Sean | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 55 | SIMS Martin L. | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 56 | SCHARF David | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.