The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

National Championships, Junior Olympic Championships & July NAC

Y-12 Men's Foil

Friday, July 9, 2021 at 1:00 PM

Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 DESERANNO Jeidus V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.9 6 +0.1
2 YANG Luao V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.9 6 +0.1
3 LI Matthew V V V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
3 LIN Michael V V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
5 HOOSHI Jayden C. V V V V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
6 CANLAS Nathan V V V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
7 LIN James G. V V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
8 KANG Anthony V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
9 WONG Garrick G. V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
9 MARX Jackson L. V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
9 SIU Aiden V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
12 YAO Bradley V V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
13 TRAUGOT Owen G. V V V V D V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
14 LIU Derek V D V V D V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
15 WONG Jackson V D V D V V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
16 GUERRA Gabriel H. V D V D V V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
17 ZHEN Ethan V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
18 TANG Albert V V V V V V V D 2.8 6 +3.2
19 TANG Owen S. D V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
20 LEE Jonah V V V V V D V D 4.3 5 +0.7
21 CO Dylan V V D V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
22 MORROW Brenden D V V V V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
23 MATSAKH Philip V V D V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
24 ZHANG Aaron V V V V D V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
25 LEE Brendan V V V V V D V D 3.4 5 +1.6
26 DINSAY Kristjan V V V D V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
27 GUO Justin D V V V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
28 SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn D V V V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
29 CHEN Kyle P. V D D V V V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
30 CHOI Ethan D V V V D V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
31 FUKUDA Diego D V V V V D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
32 NICOLETTI Luca D D V V V V V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
33 QIAN Jason H. V V D V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
34 LIU Ethan V V V D V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
35 XU Andy P. D V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
36 PALMA Nathan Anthony D V V V V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
37 LI Aaron V V D V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
38 MIN Eric V V V D D V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
39 ARIZA Abraham J. V V D V V D V D 3.5 4 +0.5
40 SOTO-ULEV Aden A. V V V D D V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
41 SIMONOV Timofey D V V V D V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
42 LI Allen D V V V V D V D 2.2 4 +1.8
43 LING Eddie V D D V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
44 HAN Derek V V D V D V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
45 LO Preston V D V V D D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
46 ZHANG Jiening G. V V D D V D V D 4.4 3 -1.4
47 SENIC Lucas V V V D D D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
48 WU Alber Y. V D V D V D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
49 TANG August L. V V D D V D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
50 HUANG Eythan D V V D V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
51 SUAREZ Adrian V V D D D V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
52 ALLEN Henry G. D D V D V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
53 TANG Alexander L. V V D D V D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
54 LORENZO Alejandro D V V V D D V D 3.0 3 -
55 XU Ethan V D V V D D V D 3.0 3 -
56 TAN Aidan D D V D V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
57 RASMUSSEN Sage D V V D V D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
58 WU Lucas D V V D V D V D 3.0 3 -
59 TANG Terry V V D V D D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
60 DERRICK Blake V V D D D D V D 3.7 2 -1.7
61 KIM Aiden D D D D V V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
62 UHLIG Cole D D V D V D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
63 KIAYIAS Aris V D D D D V V D 1.8 2 +0.2
64 FEDELI Francesco V D D D D V D 3.1 1 -2.1
65 CHENG Ethan V D V D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
66 ZENG Rick D V V V V D D 2.5 4 +1.5
67 MANIKTALA Suvir V V V V D D D 2.5 4 +1.5
68 MAO Lucas V D D V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
69 SHENG Dalton D V V V D D D 2.8 3 +0.2
70 BOBROW Silas V D V V D D D 2.6 3 +0.4
71 CORTRIGHT Skipper V D D V D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
72 SRINIVASAN Vedant D V D D V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
73 ZHUANG Chuanxuan V V V D D D D 1.9 3 +1.1
74 LI Samuel V D D V D V D 2.1 3 +0.9
75 NGUYEN martin D V D V D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
76 CHOI Benjamin D V D V D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
77 ALVAREZ ADRIAN ALEJANDRO V V D V D D D 2.8 3 +0.2
78 TALASILA Arush V V D D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
79 SONG Noel D V V D D D 1.0 2 +1.0
80 SHAO Eric D D V D D V D 3.2 2 -1.2
81 LEE Christopher T. D D D V D V D 4.2 2 -2.2
82 FANG Jaden D D V D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
83 TWEMLOW Sacha D V D V D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
84 TSAY Jordan R. V D D V D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
85 GUTH Joseph D V D D V D D 2.9 2 -0.9
86 SZIRAKI Jordan D D V D V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
87 RUSSELL Paul D D D D V V D 3.3 2 -1.3
88 BLACK Zachary D V D D V D D 2.2 2 -0.2
88 AGRAWAL Niki D D D D V V D 2.2 2 -0.2
88 GERRISH William V D D V D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
91 CHEN Ethan D V D D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
92 NOFZIGER Bennett D D D D V V D 1.1 2 +0.9
93 CHUANG Oscar D D D V D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
94 BELOKON Sammy D D D D V V D 1.6 2 +0.4
95 EDWARDS Maxon D V D V D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
96 CHENG Jonathan D D D V D D 2.1 1 -1.1
97 YUE Jackson D D V D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
98 CHEN Junxuan D D D D V D D 1.1 1 -0.1
98 PARK Ryan V D D D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
100 GULCHIN Mark D D D D V D D 2.8 1 -1.8
101 LI Lianhan D D D D D V 2.2 1 -1.2
102 KETTELLE John D D D V D D 2.3 1 -1.3
103 ZHAO Adam D D V D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
104 GRIFFITH MCALLISTER thomas D D D D D V 1.7 1 -0.7
105 AKYAMAC Bora D D D D D V 1.2 1 -0.2
106 KIM Harrison V D D D D D 2.9 1 -1.9
107 DHOKTE Neev V D D D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
108 MARISI Gabriel D D V D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
109 LIU William D D D V D D 1.9 1 -0.9
110 CHEN Kelton D D D V D D 1.3 1 -0.3
111 MO Ethan D D D D V D 1.9 1 -0.9
112 CHEW Aaron V D D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
113 ZHENG Marcus D D D V D D 2.0 1 -1.0
114 WONG Jacob W. D D V D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
115 CHO Xzander D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
116 JURMAN Therin D D D D D D 3.0 0 -3.0
117 PAULUS Gregory D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
118 CHEN David D D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2
119 JOBE Connor M. D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
119 FINDLAY Zachary D D D D D D 2.5 0 -2.5
121 DOELL Ethan D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
121 HE Bourne D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
123 KOE Beckett D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
124 SHANNON Jack D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.