The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

National Championships, Junior Olympic Championships & July NAC

Div I-A Men's Foil

Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 8:15 AM

Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 GRANT Lachlan K. V V D V V V V V V V V V 3.6 5 +1.4
2 OURSLER Jack D D V V V V V V V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
3 YEROKHIN Michael N. V D V V V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
3 GRIFFIN John O. V D V V V D V V V V D 5.2 4 -1.2
5 LI Richard V V V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
6 LOCKWOOD Owen D D D V V V V V V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
7 RUSADZE Nickolas D V D D V V V V V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
8 ZHENG Alan H. D D V V D V V V D 3.3 2 -1.3
9 ZOBEL Eric H. V V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
10 KO Brian J. V V V D V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
11 GEE Brandon V V V V V D V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
12 SONG Leonardo T. V V V V D V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
13 KWON Ethan V V V D D V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
14 BOBROW Logan V D D V V V V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
15 WU Alexander D V D V D V V V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
16 HERGERT Benito V D D D V D V V V D 3.3 2 -1.3
17 SCHLESINGER Nathan D V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
18 DESANDO Michael R. V V V V D V V D 2.9 5 +2.1
19 DIVITO Dylan V D V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
20 SUNG Chang-Han S. V V D V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
21 OTAKE Jared K. D V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
22 JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) D V V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
23 JOHNSON Aidan J. V V V V D V D 4.1 4 -0.1
24 SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. V V D D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
24 WANG Gerald Y. V V D V V D V D 1.8 4 +2.2
26 RITCHIE Luke W. V D V V D V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
27 YI Stephen K. V V D V D V V D 4.0 4 -
28 FU Samuel Y. V V D V D V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
29 DOBBINS Evan W. V D V V D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
29 SHA Yi Peng V D V D V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
31 SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. D V V V D D V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
32 PETERS Nathan M. V D D D D V V V D 2.2 2 -0.2
33 YANG Adam V V V V V V D 4.4 6 +1.6
34 DIERKS Kian V V D V V V D 2.6 5 +2.4
34 CHIN Julian S. V V V V D V D 2.9 5 +2.1
36 DESERANNO Jeidus V V D V V V 4.9 5 +0.1
37 MAGIDSON Gabriel V V V V D V D 3.9 5 +1.1
38 DANKAR Neel D V V V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
39 PYO Michael M. V V V V V D D 3.8 5 +1.2
40 COSTELLO Chaissen F. D V V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
41 CHIN Jason Y. V D V V V D D 4.7 4 -0.7
42 LIAO Alex J. V D V D V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
43 ZHAO Jason L. V V D D V V D 4.0 4 -
44 BELLUOMO David C. D V V V V D D 2.5 4 +1.5
45 BRUK Peter J. V V D V V D V D 2.6 4 +1.4
46 LI Simon A. V D V V V D V D 3.4 4 +0.6
47 LEWIS Paul D. V D V D V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
48 NEWELL Ian A. V V V D D V D 1.3 3 +1.7
49 OH Samuel H. V V D V D D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
50 GRISWOLD Abel B. V D V D V D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
51 LIU Eric Y. D V D D V V V D 1.6 3 +1.4
52 DIVENTI Paul W. D V V D V D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
53 SHIN Joshua J. D V V D D V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
54 LIN Richard W. D D V D V V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
55 LI Owen V D V V D D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
56 SCHAEFER Joshua M. D V D D V V D 1.6 2 +0.4
57 ANDERSON Colton J. V D D D V D V D 3.7 2 -1.7
58 SIEGEL Elliot V D D V D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
59 MCCLAIN Bryce C. V D D D V D V D 3.7 2 -1.7
60 CULLIVAN Justice D V D D D V V D 2.8 2 -0.8
61 DESHMUKH Ayush D V D V D D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
62 KIM Ryan Y. D D V D D V V D 1.8 2 +0.2
63 LI Eric D D V V D D V D 2.8 2 -0.8
64 JEON Caleb A. D D V D V D V D 4.1 2 -2.1
65 BLUTT Emerson B. D V V V D V D 3.6 4 +0.4
66 KIM Isaiah G. D V V V V D D 2.1 4 +1.9
67 GOOR Julian V V D D V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
68 SHAFAIE Ali V D D V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
69 ZENG Lucas H. V D D V V D D 3.9 3 -0.9
70 HODESS Ethan V D D D V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
71 ZHANG Luke T. D V D V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
72 KIM Aaron J. V D D V V D D 1.7 3 +1.3
73 GARLINGTON David D V V D D V D 4.6 3 -1.6
74 LUH Ethan K. D D V V D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
75 FOGELSON Frederick J. D V V D V D D 4.0 3 -1.0
76 ZELTSER Lawrence M. V D V V D D D 3.5 3 -0.5
77 PATINO Yahir V D V V D D D 2.0 3 +1.0
78 BRANDT-OGMAN Adlai V D V V D D D 3.0 3 -
78 TIAN Aaron C. D V V V D D D 2.4 3 +0.6
80 STRAYER Andrew V D V D D V D 1.9 3 +1.1
81 JOSEPH Willem D V D D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
82 BARTEL Jacob L. V D V D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
83 TSAY Jeremy M. D V D V D D 2.4 2 -0.4
84 KATAYAMA Kevin D D D D V V D 4.7 2 -2.7
85 WESTPHAL David R. D D D V D V D 3.2 2 -1.2
86 XIAO Anthony D V D D V D D 2.2 2 -0.2
87 SICHITIU Alexander D V V D D D D 2.6 2 -0.6
88 XIAO EDWARD D V V D D D D 2.6 2 -0.6
89 MOORE Jeremy S. D D V D D V D 3.7 2 -1.7
90 GATZA Logan D D D V V D D 2.9 2 -0.9
91 FEDONCHIK Henry J. V D D D V D D 2.1 2 -0.1
92 LEE Chris V D D V D D D 3.1 2 -1.1
93 HAN Andersen Y. V D V D D D D 2.8 2 -0.8
94 YU Jonathan J. V V D D D D D 1.2 2 +0.8
95 WU Conrad J. D D D D V V D 2.0 2 -
96 BERK Theodore V V D D D D D 1.4 2 +0.6
97 SHAJI Karthik D D D V D V 1.5 2 +0.5
97 CHENG Jonathan D V D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
99 JEFFERY Jakob D D V D V D 0.8 2 +1.2
100 WILLIAMS Connor J. D D D V V D 1.4 2 +0.6
101 CHAN Tyler D D D D V 2.4 1 -1.4
102 DAVIS Christopher M. D V D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
103 BAE Kevin V D D D D D 3.0 1 -2.0
104 TSIMIKLIS Yanni D D D D D V 1.8 1 -0.8
105 ACHILOV Sayid D D D D D V 2.1 1 -1.1
106 ZHENG zhe D V D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
107 EUSCHER Alex M. D V D D D D 3.2 1 -2.2
108 CAI Jason Zhicheng D D D V D D 2.1 1 -1.1
108 HSIUNG Richie D D D D D V 1.4 1 -0.4
110 LE Vyn A. D D D V D D 1.4 1 -0.4
111 DAUM Charlie D V D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
112 DAVIDSON Elliot D V D D D D 1.0 1 -
113 MILLER Trent D. D D D V D D 2.0 1 -1.0
114 PRASANNA Advaith D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
115 RINEHART Conner M. D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
116 JAUME Andrei D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
117 HOBSON Aaron K. D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.