The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

May NAC

Div I Men's Épée

Friday, May 7, 2021 at 2:00 PM

Richmond, VA - Richmond, VA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 HADZIC Alen V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.5 6 +0.5
2 RODNEY Adam R. V V D V V V V V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
3 SZAPARY Tristan B. V V D V V V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
3 KUSHNERIK Ethan V V V V V D V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
5 HANSEN Jonas B. V V V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
6 MOOSEKIAN Stafford V V V D V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
7 NOLLNER Dylan V D V D V V V V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
8 ELASHRY Zeyad A. D V D D V V V V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
9 EWART Jr. Stephen P. V V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
10 YOO Justin H. V V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
11 NORTH Gary S. V V V D V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
12 KUMAR Anitya V V V D V V V D 2.3 4 +1.7
13 KRAVIT Connor B. V D V V V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
14 THOMPSON Soren D D V V V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
15 JONES Simon A. V V V D D V V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
16 POPOVICI Michael A. V D D V D V V V D 2.9 2 -0.9
17 THEIN-SANDLER Adrien (Adi) M. V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
18 LAWSON Nicholas W. V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
19 MANDOKI Sandor I. V D V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
20 HADDAD Justin R. V V V V V D V D 4.6 5 +0.4
21 SANDERS Ian W. V D V V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
22 LIU Alexander V D V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
23 GUINAN Joseph V V V V V D V D 3.1 5 +1.9
24 SPITERI Gareth J. V V V V D V D 2.6 4 +1.4
25 MA Ark V V V V D V D 3.1 4 +0.9
26 LAWSON Henry A. V D V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
27 KRAFT Dennis A. V V D V V D V D 5.1 4 -1.1
28 SILVERS Noah E. V D V V D V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
29 SMITH Dwight D V V V D V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
30 SHARMA Sanil D V V V D V V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
31 FRAY Alexander D V V D D V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
32 ZHANG Joshua V D D D V D V V D 3.6 2 -1.6
33 KIM Juni C. V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
34 KAULL James T. V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
35 WEISS Lewis E. V V D V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
36 LEE Ryan D V V V V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
37 IVE Isaac L. D V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
38 KIM William M. V D V V V V D 1.6 5 +3.4
39 FISHLER Clifford D V V V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
40 DOLGONOS Mark D V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
41 GRABER Andrew J. V V V D D V D 2.8 4 +1.2
42 TSINIS Alexander E. V V V D D V D 5.2 4 -1.2
43 WHITE Sean D V V V D V D 5.1 4 -1.1
44 CHONG christopher V V D V D V D 2.3 4 +1.7
45 MACZIK Adam W. D V V D V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
46 MCDOWALD Curtis E. V V D D V V V D 5.5 4 -1.5
47 SIMMONS Ariel (Ari) J. V D V D V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
48 TAFOYA Devin D. V V D D V V D 3.0 3 -
49 PISKOVATSKOV Anton V V D V D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
49 GATZA Logan D V V D V V D 1.7 3 +1.3
51 CARPENTER Liam D D V V V V D 3.0 3 -
52 KUDRIAVTCEV Sergei D V V V D D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
53 ZAFFT Maximo S. V D D D V V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
54 ISAAC Joseph (Izzy) V V V D D D V D 4.3 3 -1.3
55 ROBINSON Riley D V D V V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
56 KOKENGE Clark D V V D V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
57 MARAKOV Allen B. V D V D D V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
58 SMITH Justin C. D V D V D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
59 STUSNICK Hunter D D V D V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
60 JIN Owen D V D D V D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
61 HILBERT Xavier V D D D D V V D 3.7 2 -1.7
62 GLAZ Nicholas S. D V D V D D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
63 GANA Jr Jorge M. D D D V D V V D 2.8 2 -0.8
64 KIM Tei D. D D V V D D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
65 SHELANSKI Isaac V V D D V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
66 WIMMER Chandler M. D V D V V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
67 SCHUMACHER Cooper J. V D V D V D 3.7 3 -0.7
68 CUMMINGS Atticus C. V D V D V D 2.7 3 +0.3
69 CLICK Aiden D V V D V D 1.3 3 +1.7
70 WEISS Miles J. D D V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
71 MOSES Alexander D D V D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
72 CANAUX Gabriel A. V D V V D D D 3.9 3 -0.9
73 LIANG Aaron V V D D V D D 1.7 3 +1.3
74 IYOKI Kent V D V D V D D 4.2 3 -1.2
75 CHO Tyler H. D V D V D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
76 BUYANOV Nikita V. D V V D D V D 1.5 3 +1.5
77 SAITOC Tudor D D V D V V D 4.4 3 -1.4
78 RUSSANOV Dennis D V D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
79 VAYSBERG Nathan V D D V D D 3.2 2 -1.2
80 VERMEULE Spencer D V V D D D 3.0 2 -1.0
81 FEINBERG Gabriel M. D D V V D D 2.8 2 -0.8
82 SHIV Rishi V V D D D D 1.1 2 +0.9
83 MORSE Tyler D V D D V D 1.0 2 +1.0
84 JEONG Connor V V D D D D D 3.5 2 -1.5
85 MUN Michael K. D D D V D V D 3.5 2 -1.5
86 GRAY Sterling B. V D V D D D D 3.2 2 -1.2
86 LIN Ryan V D V D D D D 2.8 2 -0.8
88 JEON Alexander E. V V D D D D D 2.8 2 -0.8
89 PARK Prestan S. D V D D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
90 PARK Ian C. D D D V D D 1.0 1 -
91 GOHEL Dayus T. D V D D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
92 ZHU Max D D D V D 1.7 1 -0.7
93 SIVAKUMAR Ajit V D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
94 MOORE Shomari A. V D D D D 3.0 1 -2.0
95 LEE Shwan D D D V D 1.1 1 -0.1
96 PARK Jong-Eun D D D V D 1.1 1 -0.1
97 WICKBOLDT Eric V D D D D 0.4 1 +0.6
98 GIBSON Nowell L. D D D V D 2.0 1 -1.0
98 LI Brian X D V D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
100 KANG Philip F. D D D D D V 1.8 1 -0.8
101 JAYENDRA Chandrashekar D D D V D D 2.8 1 -1.8
102 YAO Shun D D D V D D 1.0 1 -
102 SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. D D D V D D 2.2 1 -1.2
104 SNIDER Jeffrey H. D D V D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
105 CHIEN Zachary M. D D D V D D 1.8 1 -0.8
106 KIM Sterling S. D D D D D V 0.8 1 +0.2
107 GARRETT Samuel V D D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
108 GOLDFINE Ian J. D D D D V D 2.2 1 -1.2
109 BOYCE Samuel H. D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
110 FELDMAN Jaemin D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
111 CHAWLA Armaan D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
112 ADLER Ethan M. D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
113 DIXON Samuel D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
114 PAHLAVI Kamran D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
115 LIOZNYANSKY Simon D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
116 CRANE Matthew T. D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
117 LAI Coby D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
118 WOZNIAK Sebastian D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.