New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WU Alexander | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 2 | KWON Ethan | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 3 | KAO Castor T. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 3 | LI Richard | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 5 | SCHENCK Koen M. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 6 | SHA Yi Peng | V V V V V | V V V | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 7 | BAE Kevin | V V V D D | V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 8 | LE Vyn A. | V D V D V D | V V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 9 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 10 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 11 | LEE Jacob J | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 12 | DAI Jonathan T. | D V D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 13 | BRUK Peter J. | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 14 | BING Charles | D V V D V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 15 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 16 | LAURICELLA Douglas | D D V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 17 | KIM Yonjae | V V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 18 | BAS Liam | V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 19 | JIANG Owen | V D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 20 | LI Eric | V V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 21 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 22 | FU Samuel Y. | V V V D V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 23 | GU Andrew | V V V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 24 | GONG Benjamin | V D D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 25 | SHIN Joshua J. | D V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 26 | AHN Jun | D V V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 27 | SONG Bryan | D V V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 28 | CHAN Tyler | V V D V D D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 29 | BELLUOMO David C. | V D D V D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 30 | TSAI Max W. | D D V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 31 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | D D D V D V | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 32 | GUERRERO Isaac C. | D D V D D V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 33 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | V V V D D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 34 | SIMA Congyu Josh | D D V V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 35 | KLEIN Sebastian W. | D V V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 36 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | D V D V D V | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 37 | TORRES Treston | V D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 38 | VALENTON Timothy | D V D V V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 39 | PO Oliver | D D V V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 40 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | D V D V V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 41 | DAVIDSON Elliot | D V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 42 | TALLARICO Matthew | V D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 43 | MILLER Aidan A. | D V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 44 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | D D V D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 45 | WU Michael | D V V D D D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 46 | YOON DYLAN | D V D D V D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 47 | BUCKLEY-JONES Henry C. | D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 48 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 49 | MENG Zhaoyi | D D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 50 | LIN James G. | D D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 51 | ALIMI Yacine A. | D V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 52 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | V D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 53 | ZHEN Ethan | V D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 54 | RNO Kyler | D D D D V D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 55 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 56 | MILLER Jordan | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 57 | GARDOS Noah | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 58 | POPE Alexander | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 59 | SHIKHMANQ Lennon | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 60 | REZA Farazi | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 61 | WERTZ Erik | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.